Fri, Jul 08, 2011 | 14:01 BST
GameStop lists minimum and recommended specs for BF3 on PC
GameStop has listed minimum and recommended specs for those who plan on playing Battlefield 3 on PC.

While we cannot confirm these are entirely official, but it should give you an idea of what sorts of innards your PC needs to play the shooter.
We have sent a mail to verify the listing, just in case, especially since XP is not listed in there anywhere.
Minimum
- Hard Drive Space: 15 GB for disc version or 10 GB for digital version
- OS: Windows Vista or Windows 7
- Processor: Core 2 Duo @ 2.0GHzRAM2GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10 or 11 compatible Nvidia or AMD ATI card
Recommended
- Hard Drive Space: 15 GB for disc version or 10 GB for digital version
- OS: Windows 7 64-bit
- Processor: Quad-core Intel or AMD CPURAM 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 11 Nvidia or AMD ATI card, GeForce GTX 460, Radeon Radeon HD 6850
BF3 is out in October.
Via GamerZines.


30 comments
#1
loki
08/07/11, 2:08 pm
PC boring
BF3 boriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing
#2
Dr.Ghettoblaster
08/07/11, 2:20 pm
So wait…….you CAN’T install this game with XP at all??
#3
someguy2
08/07/11, 2:24 pm
@2 They said they dropped it ages ago.
Need to get my new graphics card in time for this. Hopefully a GTX560Ti meets the recommended requirements.
#4
Peetry
08/07/11, 2:25 pm
@2 No you can’t, it is a decade old it had to happen sometime
#5
Talkar
08/07/11, 2:25 pm
I think that the RAM should be moved down, in the listing, so people doesn’t get confused, since it is listed as being a part of the central processing unit x)
#6
Grimrita
08/07/11, 2:27 pm
Anyone can guess about the specs for anything really. Nothing unexpected here at all.
#7
Uncontested
08/07/11, 2:27 pm
I noticed the same thing with the RAM… With that said.. gonna need a new PC to play this beast..
#8
Erthazus
08/07/11, 2:31 pm
Not much to be honest. Very optimized game and thats a good sign.
I have 8 GB Ram for 5 years already and next year i’m going to upgrade it to 16 already or 24.
#9
Maximum Payne
08/07/11, 2:35 pm
@8 Are you playing or making games
#10
Stephany Nunneley
08/07/11, 2:37 pm
@4 Funnily enough, as someone who just switched from XP to W7 on their PC (have Vista on laptop), I know quite a few PC wizards who have yet to move on from XP just because they like the OS better than what is on offer. Which is honestly why it took me so long to upgrade. I hate being “forced” to do something I don’t want.
#11
Fin
08/07/11, 2:38 pm
Why the 5gb difference in HD space? Compression for the digital version?
#12
Dr.Ghettoblaster
08/07/11, 2:42 pm
@10
Thank you Stephany. My thoughts exactly. Looks like the time to upgrade to W7 may have just finally come indeed.
#13
spiderLAW
08/07/11, 2:44 pm
My office PC is well above the recommended specs….but its my office PC
My home PC is barely above the minimum specs……how quickly Pc’s become obsolete
#14
albo88
08/07/11, 2:52 pm
all i need is a new GPU ill go for the 6950 1gb version that card is epic
#15
badboy_122
08/07/11, 3:20 pm
aaaah XP .. old times ..good times .. but 7 is better in every aspect
but I think there is gonna be a work around … remember GTA IV it was also said that it runs only on vista and above OSs , but they released something like a mod to make it playable on XP … so they might release something similar ..right ?!!!
#16
deadstoned
08/07/11, 3:30 pm
My graphics cards good enough as a 5870 1gb, but I have a Q6600 which is starting to get on a bit in CPU terms now. It’s over 4 years old now
. Looks like I’ll be looking at Sandy bridge/Ivy bridge soon.
#17
Hybridpsycho
08/07/11, 3:34 pm
@24 Erthazus
Either you have no idea on what you’re doing when it comes to hardware, or you are working like mad with 3D rendering and other heavy shit like that.
16 and 24GB of ram is obsolete today, it’s a complete waste if you’re just a gamer.
I recently bought a new PC and I’m running 6GB, there’s no need for more.
#18
NoxNoctisUmbra
08/07/11, 4:54 pm
HMM.. I got GTX 465 (2 of them SLI mode)
12 GB or RAM
i7 CPU @ 3.07GHz
Windows 7 64 bit
Will be playing at 1920 x 1200 resolution
I should be fine for max settings. I play Bad Company 2 fully maxed without any hiccups very smooth game play
@1 You are immature, that what separates from Console gamers to PC gamers. Overall Console gamers, lets run and gun. PC games they mostly use teamwork and can handle things more mature. Go play BF BC2 on PC, your ass will be handed to you! So now STFU and go suck on your moms tit.
#19
Fin
08/07/11, 5:00 pm
I have an Xbox 360 I bought five years ago.
Still runs fine, everything looks nice, no reason to upgrade anytime soon.
Some machine.
#20
Edix
08/07/11, 5:24 pm
The reason your xbox “still looks fine” is because it has forced developers to stagnate there creativity for the last 6 years. Yeah you look at the PC version of games and then look at your Xbox and you think “wow it still looks nice” because they CANNOT make it look nicer on the PC in order for it to fit on your 6-year-old-technology box. And no developer is going to spend x2 the resources and pull double duty on any game and make two versions. Face it. Your console gaming is holding the industry back.
#21
Dralen
08/07/11, 7:26 pm
Your missing out if you haven’t moved on to Windows 7 yet. The performance increase is awesome for games.
#22
Erthazus
08/07/11, 7:30 pm
@Hybrid, for now of course it’s useless, but Ram these days is so cheap.
I bought 8 GB ram for like 5 years ago and i still have room for that.
#23
Kenshin1870
08/07/11, 8:24 pm
Nice, i expect something like this.
Pd: Xp FATALITY xDDDD
#24
psybass
08/07/11, 11:16 pm
WTF?! no DirectX 9? how the fuck I’m gonna play this game? i have Radeon 4850! fuck this game….
#25
Phoenixblight
09/07/11, 12:01 am
@24
Get the console version. Thats practically what you would be playing on anyways if they did allow DX9 for the PC.
#26
psybass
09/07/11, 12:33 am
25@
if only i had one. oh well no BF3 for me.
#27
Boboinho
09/07/11, 3:25 pm
@24
“Video Card: DirectX 10 or 11 compatible Nvidia or AMD ATI card”
Maybe you should try DX10 since HD4850 supports it. Or are you also still using XP?
And fuck this game? It’s an 3 year old card and finally a developer tries to push the visualls of a game and you cry about you’re old card. Go buy a console if you want to use the same hardware for a decade.
#28
Demonoid Phenomenon
12/07/11, 4:41 am
Don’t you folks find it amusing that people will bitch about spending $60 on a game but we’ll spend $300 to upgrade our systems to play it?
#29
Phoenixblight
12/07/11, 5:00 am
@28
My computer has been souped and not for gaming that’s just a benefit for doing Computer heavy work.
#30
Christopher Jack
12/07/11, 5:56 am
My ancient Q6600 CPU shouldn’t have any issues playing this. Within the first month of the processor being released over here, I see a Lenovo desktop with the very chip inside in the clearance isle for less than it’d cost me for the individual processor
All I had to do is shove in a GPU & I had an amazing beast at that time, but it didn’t take me long before I needed to replace that hunk of shit =\ For now, I’m happy enough with my Radeon 5670, I’m still more likely to get this on my PS3 if I get it at all though.