Valve: MS needs to be “comfortable” in opening up Xbox Live

Thursday, 25th August 2011 09:29 GMT By Johnny Cullen

Valve had Gabe Newell has said that the company still wants to bring Steamworks to Xbox Live, but admitted that Microsoft needs to relax the rules on what publishers can and can’t do with the service.

Newell told Eurogamer at gamescom that bringing Steamworks to 360 users was something “we’d really like to be able to do,” citing the success it had in implementing the tools into the more open PSN with the release of Portal 2, which included cross-platform PC/Mac and PS3 play, cloud support and Steam achievements that were unlocked via the PC version or by getting trophies in the PS3 version.

“We certainly can deliver a lot of value to customers to the degree to which we have those capabilities. With the PS3 obviously we made a lot more progress with that,” he said when asked if he’d like to see Steamworks implemented for the PSN and XBL versions of Counter Strike: Global Offensive.

“The PS3 customers of Portal 2 are going to start to see the benefits of that with Portal 2 DLC coming out in September. So we’d really like to be able to do that for Xbox customers as well.”

He added: “The main thing is having Microsoft get comfortable with it and let us do it. Right now, there’s a huge amount of updates and free content we’ve been able to deliver to people who have The Orange Box that we haven’t been able to deliver to the Xbox because of the restrictions that have been placed on us on Xbox Live.

“We’d love to see those relaxed. Other developers on the PS3 are starting to benefit from Sony’s more open approach. Hopefully that will help Microsoft see that’s a good strategy for making customers happy, that the barbarians won’t tear down the walls of Xbox and turn it into some chaotic wasteland.”

Counter Strike: Global Offensive launches next year for PS3, 360 and PC.



  1. Shubb9

    Looks like what EA are saying to Valve, Valve are saying to MS. Both MS and Valve want their slice and won’t let anyone else sneak in for some free cake.

    #1 3 years ago
  2. viralshag

    @1, That’s pretty much how it reads to me too. I would like to see the service there and I’m sure it would be a benefit to gamers as a whole. But I think MS looks at this as something they don’t need.

    They have one of, if not the most popular online services, not to mention it is a paid for subscription. If they felt they needed something to boost their service further, I think it would strongly be considered but as it stands, imo at least, Live > PSN, and they don’t need it.

    #2 3 years ago
  3. Blerk

    That’s be my take too – I very much doubt Microsoft will allow this unless they think that they’re losing out somehow. Although it offers a few neat options, the majority of the features are just duplicated of what Live does already – would they ever want to draw attention away from their own features in order to promote someone else’s? Unlikely, I suspect.

    #3 3 years ago
  4. LOLshock94

    GABE GIVE UP, theres no point in getting steam on xbox since you release 1 game a year theres no point in having steam, look what steams changed on ps3…NOTHING

    #4 3 years ago
  5. aprotosis

    You know who else benefitted from Sony’s more open approach? Hackers.

    #5 3 years ago
  6. Phoenixblight

    What 4 said.

    #6 3 years ago
  7. Ireland Michael

    This will never, ever happen. Microsoft are huge control freaks when it comes to their products and network infrastructure.

    #7 3 years ago

Comments are now closed on this article.