Thu, Aug 05, 2010 | 14:34 BST
Warner announces Batman: Arkham City for fall 2011

Warner’s just announced Rocksteady’s Batman: Arkham Asylum sequel, known as Arkham City.
The game releases next fall for PS3, 360 and Games for Windows
Game Informer also has it on its new cover, which features Catwoman in the two covers planned by the mag.
It was announced earlier this week that the game would be featured in OPM and OXM, but Warner and GI’s beaten them to the chicken.
The sequel to Arkham Aslyum was announced last December at the VGAs, where a teaser trailer showed that Arkham Asyum itself was moved into Gotham City.
It also showed the Joker and Harley Quinn for the game, confirming their appearances in the game.
Also mentioned for the Rocksteady sequel was baddies Talia al Ghul, Mr. Freeze and Two Face.
The UK dev was bought earlier this year by Warner, who will be publishing the game this time instead of Arkham Asylum publisher Square Enix.
We can only think of one word right now: it begins with P and ends with umped.
Press release is below.
BURBANK, Calif. – (Business Wire) Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment and DC Entertainment today announced /*Batman: Arkham City™*/ as the title for its follow-up to the award-winning, critically acclaimed hit videogame /Batman: Arkham Asylum™/. /*Batman: Arkham City*/ will be available for the Xbox 360® video game and entertainment system from Microsoft, Games for Windows PC and the PlayStation®3 computer entertainment system in Fall 2011.
Developed by Rocksteady Studios, /*Batman: Arkham City*/ builds upon the intense, atmospheric foundation of /Batman: Arkham Asylum,/ sending players soaring into Arkham City, the new maximum security “home” for all of Gotham City’s thugs, gangsters and insane criminal masterminds. Set inside the heavily fortified walls of a sprawling district in the heart of Gotham City, this highly anticipated sequel introduces a brand-new story that draws together a new all-star cast of classic characters and murderous villains from the Batman universe, as well as a vast range of new and enhanced gameplay features to deliver the ultimate experience as the Dark Knight.
/*Batman: Arkham City*/ is based on DC Comics’ core Batman license. Fans can/* */visit www.batmanarkhamcity.com to sign up to receive updates regarding the game.


60 comments
Older Comments
#51
Phoenixblight
05/08/10, 10:51 pm
@50
You must have played the wrong game because Batman AA was for mature players. It will stay as at the same rating as the last one because thats the sweet spot for this franchise.
You need to get out more if want sex in a video game.
#52
ninjanutta
06/08/10, 12:36 am
@31 an alienware laptop would play any game at super high quality,it will cost you nearly 4000 pound but its a pure gaming rig.
#53
Phoenixblight
06/08/10, 1:19 am
@52
You could get a gaming rig that is better quality and will give you better use at a fraction of Alienware.
#54
Moonwalker1982
06/08/10, 1:20 am
While i really don’t need sex or Joker ripping people apart, i really DO would like to see blood. Arkham Asylum was such a dark place, it really wasn’t a kid’s game. But still it lacked any kind of blood. When for example those thugs shot the two guards to death, i was expecting some blood…none of it. It takes away from the realism.
#55
Boris Fett
06/08/10, 3:33 am
I find it slightly humorous that people are asking for a level of “maturity” and “darkness” in the games that you don’t even see in the comic books.
#56
Amir Mirzaee
06/08/10, 7:39 am
I want it to get an M rating. I don’t think there are newcomers to this comic series. Batman fans are older now. Just think how great it would be if The Dark Knight movie was R-rated. I don’t know why do they need that Teen rating? Joker is threatening anyone he sees to kill him in an obscene way; we should be able to see those killing… I want to see those killing. Catwoman is actually Batman’s lover, why don’t we see them making love? One great example for dark comics is Sin City. Just look at the movie, its gore and blood made it a great movie.
#57
Detale
06/08/10, 8:49 am
I’m sure there are plenty of place on the internet where you can watch Batman and Catwoman making love if you really want to see it.
Batman is an iconic character who appeals to fans of all ages, from the Saturday morning cartoons, the comics, the movies and all the related merchandising. I’d say it’s a fairly safe bet that they’re not going to have ol’ Bats giving Catwoman one from behind in a videogame.
I loved AA and thought it was perfectly pitched, a different take on the whole concept but still retaining the core of the character. Can’t wait to see how they’re going to expand on that.
#58
Demiath
06/08/10, 8:56 am
@54:
So the lack of blood takes away from the “realism”, huh? I would have thought the lack of realism had something to do with, say, the outlandish costumes, mutating Jokers and MGS-like metagame pranks? Or is that fairly pedestrian stuff in your view?
Don’t get me wrong; Arkham Asylum was a great game. But thankfully the developers never attempted to include any kind of realism to begin with (and contrary to popular belief, grittiness is not the same thing as realism), so I’m not sure what substantial difference the addition of “blood” would have made.
#59
Moonwalker1982
06/08/10, 12:10 pm
@ 58, all i am saying is that it would have added to the atmosphere. Let’s imagine a game like Dead Space without any blood? Any blood smeared on the walls and floor…it adds to the experience and atmosphere. Ok, so realism was the wrong word.
@ 55
That’s where you are wrong
Look up ‘A death in the family’ from the Batman comics or lots of other Batman comics, Batman was actually quite mature in several comics. Just not the animated series comics.
#60
Amin360
06/08/10, 3:26 pm
wow
I cant believe !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Older Comments