Wed, Mar 17, 2010 | 22:16 GMT
Vanquish being built on PS3 first to avoid a dodgy port

Resident Evil creator Shinji Mikami has said that his decision to develop Vanquish for PS3 first was because he wanted to make sure it was not a shoddy port.
Speaking with PSM3, Mikami said that once the team figures out how to make the game for PS3, it will move onto Xbox 360 next.
“The team knows less about making games for PS3 than Xbox 360, so we thought the sensible thing to do was to make the game on PS3 first then move it over to Xbox,” he said.
“If we can get Vanquish to a certain standard on PS3, we can make Xbox the same.”
Mikami revealed this morning that he’s to form a new studio in Tokyo after the release of Vanquish.
Via CVG.


64 comments
Older Comments
#51
Blerk
18/03/10, 12:58 pm
That’s purely down to the Blu-Ray drive not being fast enough though, surely?
I wouldn’t call the PS3 ‘badly designed’, just ‘unnecessarily different’. PC architecture has evolved to be pretty simple for a very good reason.
But I completely disagree with your assumption that different console architectures lead to more interesting games, Hindle. Without that learning curve developers would have tons more time to put into the actual games rather than fighting to learn new ways of doing the same stuff.
#52
Michael O’Connor
18/03/10, 1:01 pm
“I wouldn’t call the PS3 ‘badly designed’, just ‘unnecessarily different’.”
Same difference. It’s difference for difference’s sake.
#53
Eregol
18/03/10, 1:05 pm
Tomonobu Itagaki reckons the SNES was harder to develop for than the PS3 though.
#54
The Hindle
18/03/10, 1:07 pm
I personally wouldnt want all the consoles to be designed the same way as all the exclusives would start to look the same. Uncharted 2 looks like it does because of the Cell and Blue Ray.
Left 4 Dead is so bloody good because of the 360s online design. Mario Galaxy and Wii sports are so dam fun because it makes full use of the Wiis strengths.
It may be a good idea if they were but id say it would be really bad for games in general. The install is something the 360 can do as well and ive never had a problem with it.
#55
Blerk
18/03/10, 1:11 pm
The SNES was a product of its time, though. These days we have standard ways of doing stuff, there’s no need to keep reinventing the wheel for the sake of it.
#56
theevilaires
18/03/10, 1:15 pm
O’Connor I swear you are the most ignorant fucker to ever post on this site next to BDH. STFU or I will rip your ass a new one. I’m tired of your shit. You don’t like peoples opinions well just ignore them, stop quoting every fucking body.
Go to your site O’Connor and harass the people there….oh sorry you don’t get any visitors at that shit site. Do us all a favor and leave like psychotext.
#57
cookiejar
18/03/10, 1:21 pm
Yep, its more of a bugger to develop for than the others. But the end product on some of the games that take full advantage of it, is absolutely worth it, and look better than anything else.
Having said that though, they are mainly Sony games. So if Sony helped out third parties more, they would get better results.
#58
Michael O’Connor
18/03/10, 1:23 pm
“O’Connor I swear you are the most ignorant fucker to ever post on this site next to BDH.”
“You don’t like peoples opinions well just ignore them, stop quoting every fucking body.”
You are a very dark-coloured pot calling an extremely clean kettle black, my good man. *shakes his head and laughs*
#59
Gheritt White
18/03/10, 2:42 pm
Ignore button NOW, please!
#60
Eregol
18/03/10, 2:46 pm
@57
Sony have extended their hands to third parties to offer help.
It’s up to those third parties to take up the offer.
#61
Artheval_Pe
18/03/10, 3:48 pm
O’Connor [...] STFU or I will rip your ass a new one.
I wonder how you’re going to do that ^^
To O’Connor : Gabe Newell thought that Sony deliberatly designed the PS3 so that the code written for that platform wouldn’t work well anywhere else. The strategy for Sony was that since they were the leaders, they could force everybody to develop for their console, having developers spending most of their R&D budget on PS3 programming, leaving little room for R&D on programming for other consoles.
So, probably not for the sake of being different, but for the sake of gaining a strategic advantage (that as in fact turned against them).
(By the way, that comment was made before the PS3 came out, so Gabe didn’t know at that time that it wouldn’t perform that well at first)
#62
DjFlex
18/03/10, 8:09 pm
Oh well…another game site’s forums destroyed by PS3 fanboys. The animosity and name calling towards others who disagree is beyond childish.
And to actually think that my comment was thought of as an O’Connor alternate account just shows the delusion of PS3 fanboys…jeez!
#63
Eregol
18/03/10, 9:08 pm
@62
I love how you only blame PS3 fanboys.
There have been plenty of examples of 360 fanboys doing their very best to ruin things as well you know?
A lot of us are sensible and like to actually have a discussion. So, don’t tar us all with the same brush.
#64
Joe_Gamer
19/03/10, 3:10 am
Now Ladies, there are all types of fan-bois, no need to fight about which is worse they are all too ignorant to realize that it is in fact the PC that is the greatest Mwuahahahaha
PS, No seriously, it’s all about the PC
Older Comments