Sections

Uncanny valley “will always be a problem”, says Square tech boss

Tuesday, 10th July 2012 05:41 GMT By Brenna Hillier

Square Enix has produced some of the most respected graphics tech in the industry, but worldwide technology director Julien Merceron says game characters will probably never look photo-realistic.

In an interview with GamesIndustry, Merceron said the recent Agni’s Philosophy Luminous demo showed what next-gen graphics can bring to a game, but that developers can’t get too hung up on graphics alone.

“Focusing on graphics only would be a huge mistake. You start to have super great graphics, characters look really good and you end up in the uncanny valley, but you don’t have animation at the same quality level,” Merceron said, referring to a widely-held hypothesis that too-realistic non-human figures are disturbing.

“Same thing with behavior and AI; it animates well and looks good, but it is making stupid decisions. It simply won’t be immersive. So focusing on graphics only is a big mistake. People will need to focus on animation, and I believe our Philosophy demo is highlighting that, but also on the AI and physics too.”

Merceron said impressive graphical feats are quickly surpassed, but animation fails to keep up, leading to an unnecessary lag in realistic appearances and behaviour.

“The problem I am talking about is, as soon as we ramp up the quality on graphics, this level of quality on facial animations won’t be good enough. Some games succeed to be at the limit of the uncanny valley, but the problem is that as rendering quality will go up, new problems will surface,” he said.

“The quality of the facial and body animations and the acting won’t be good enough. So that is why as you evolve, you have to upgrade your physics, rendering and animations. It will always be a problem. As you push something, you have to recalibrate and rebalance these out. You can’t have these stunning graphics while characters are acting funny on the screen.”

Merceron’s solution is to focus on immersion rather than pushing for photo-realistic graphics.

“The gameplay needs to be involving, the environment needs to be immersive, and the characters need to be full of emotions so you are totally sucked into the experience. This is why we have this role of balancing all these things so we end up with something that is consistent and works well,” he said.

Breaking news

5 Comments

Sign in to post a comment.

  1. roadkill

    What are they talking about? The graphics were good but you can still easily identify that demo as a game demo. Animations are average. So while the demo might impress it’s still very much away from looking real.

    #1 2 years ago
  2. sh4dow

    Well… I’m not so sure about that. Hardware scanning people and creating somewhat accurate representations in 3D have been around for a while. It’s just a matter of refining that technology to make 100% accurate scans possible and then a matter of having graphics cards powerful enough to push that many polygons. Or maybe somebody thinking of a better way to do graphics than using polygons.

    And animation… Well… don’t animate, simulate. And motion capture. I know there are issues involved with this but I don’t see why it shouldn’t be possible to figure out ways to smoothly blend different motion capture data and have accurate real-time simulations of the human body over the next decades.

    #2 2 years ago
  3. ManuOtaku

    I agree with him, i dont like photo realistic graphics, i prefer my games looking like advance cartoons, rather than realistic, that is why i do have reality for, so in the end i hope they go for more quality graphics, with fluid animation, which can be like real life, and great AI, which mimics real life also, but not for graphics, they are great the way they are, and the way they always have been.

    #3 2 years ago
  4. Da Man

    Not only will they never be able to look truly photo realistic, but no amount of texturing and shaders will ever be able to properly imitate any half decent actor.

    #4 2 years ago
  5. Ireland Michael

    …and the average Triple A game budget will end up being around $100,000,000.

    #5 2 years ago