Sections

Rage against the machine: Total War Rome 2′s brutal AI

Thursday, 1st August 2013 14:00 GMT By Stace Harman

Stace Harman explores the lengths that the AI of Total War: Rome 2 will go to in order to crush you and speaks to The Creative Assembly’s James Russell and Pawel Wojs.

Total War: Rome 2

Total War: Rome 2 is the eighth full-release in the Total War series, which dates back 13 years to 2000. The original Rome: Total War launched in 2004.

Total War: Rome 2 will be released on September 3, jump through here to check its minimum and recommended specs

A recent 10-minute game play video showed off campaign mode and highlighted some of the differences between the playable factions.

The Creative Assembly has made an interactive version of the campaign map available on the Total War website.

The visual spectacle of hundreds of soldiers clashing on the battlefields of Total War: Rome 2 is certainly a sight to behold.

Surveying the ebb and flow of tiny troops from a distance offers a sense of the huge scale of the battles, while focusing the camera on an individual soldier offers a wince-inducing close-up view of the action.

On a previous visit to The Creative Assembly’s motion capture studio, I gained some insight into what it takes to create the animations that bring those battlefields to life, as well as discovering that Roman Legionnaires are partial to a bit of YMCA.

However, looking the part is only half the battle and so, this time around, I decide to leave the spandex suit at home.

After several hours with Rome 2’s prologue missions, I sat down with lead game designer James Russell and lead battlefield artist Pawel Wojs to discuss siege mentality, difficulty levels and how the AI adapts from fighting on the open expanse of rolling fields to the close quarters of a burning city.

“For cities it’s a real big challenge, so much so that we’ve designed a new AI for sieges,” explains Wojs. “All the streets and squares and points are highlighted to the AI and they use them to flank, block and establish defence points.

“We’ve given ourselves a crazy problem to solve because most games script everything, even other RTS games are based on set missions, whereas we’re pretty much sandbox so our AI has to look intelligent and behave in every single situation it’s placed in.”


Check out these new interviews from the game’s recent press tour and some campaign prologue gameplay.

For the most part, the AI responds appropriately to the challenges I present to it. There are tangible advantages to be gained from utilising the terrain during a skirmish and to manoeuvring to attack an enemy unit from the side or rear. The AI understands these factors and so occasionally tries to disengage from a head-on conflict to regroup on higher ground.

Likewise, I pay dearly when a rush of blood to the head sees me order my Roman cavalry to cut deep into the exposed flank of a company of Samnite soldiers and then chase down the stragglers as they break. It’s a gleeful moment until my cavalry becomes isolated from the main body of my army and the enemy AI quickly moves its spearmen to block the riders’ return path.

It feels like the AI is constantly evaluating the battlefield and reacting to my strategy (or lack thereof), which ensures that conflicts are much more than just two sides hammering chunks out of one another until the strongest wins. However, Creative Assembly acknowledges that there’s still room for polishing.

This was particularly evident during the prologue where some AI actions occasionally failed to trigger and my commander unit felt particularly vulnerable, which rendered his area-of-effect ability largely redundant as I had to keep him away from the frontline.

Reacting to the player’s actions is just one element of the AI’s decision-making process. Balancing its perceived intelligence at higher difficulty levels is an essential factor in presenting an AI challenge that feels both difficult to overcome but remains fair.

Traditionally, strategy titles have relied on conferring buffs upon the AI to increase the challenge they pose and while Russell admits that a degree of this is “inevitable”, the Rome 2 lead designer also highlights a range of other factors that contribute to the AI’s behaviour.

“There’s actually an element of penalising the AI at normal difficulty and removing some of those penalties at higher difficulty levels,” said Russell. “We also make sure that, with something like the visibility system, the AI has to navigate the battlefield in the same way the player does and so send out scouts to find its way.”

Russell went on to explain that it’s once a computer-controlled opponent has the lay of the land and has assessed the strengths and weaknesses of a player’s army that the AI’s behaviour will vary depending on difficulty level.

“There’s a difference between flat-out difficulty and AI aggression but they’re correlated, right? Fundamentally, you want the AI player not to let-up on higher difficulty levels but sometimes you get weird counter-intuitive things going on.

“For example, if you attack an army it makes a judgement about whether you’re going to win that battle. If you’re more powerful than it then we actually have this situation where the higher the level of the AI the more likely it is to retreat, if it can.

“That’s much like a human player would, but at the same time if you’re playing on Easy then you don’t want the AI constantly running away while you’re trying to beat it so on easier levels it’s less likely to retreat.”

I’ve now spent around eight hours with Rome 2’s prologue and am encouraged by the fact that, aside from the very first one, none of the missions feel like a hand-holding exercise. The game is quick to hand over the reins and, once it’s introduced you to some of the primary features of the campaign map, it leaves you to your own devices.

This means experienced players won’t feel mollycoddled and new players have the chance to properly understand the consequences of their actions and formulate customised strategies, rather than just following a succession of banal instructions.

There’s also the opportunity to tackle optional senate missions and capture cities before constructing improvements and researching technologies to bolster the efficiency of your empire and armies.

Just don’t expect to have it all your own way and know that for every political coup, daring raid or savvy tactical manoeuvre that you execute, Rome 2’s AI is actively plotting to counter your successes and limit your conquests, both on and off the battlefield.

Disclosure: To assist in writing this piece and creating the embedded video, both Stace and Sam attended a Total War: Rome 2 press event in Rome. Travel, meals and accommodation were paid for by Sega.

Breaking news

3 Comments

Sign in to post a comment.

  1. GrimRita

    I’ve tried so hard NOT to get excited about Rome 2 because due to CA’s last outing, which was nothing more than a hollow, unfinished mess – Shogun 2.

    Looking the these videos now, its clear that Rome 2 finally has the same level of scope as Empire did, my only concern again is if Sega will yet again release another TW game with broken AI, multiplayer etc etc because its a trend that has put me off pre-ordering any TW games going forward

    #1 9 months ago
  2. wal_martian

    Brutal AI?? Don’t make me laugh my ass off…… This is obviously a hype piece as anyone who actually objectively analyzed CA pre game material has seen that they say the same damn thing before they release their newest title. My first gripe comes with Empire total war ” The AI WILL MIMIC NAPOLEON!!!” then ingame….The ai couldn’t even form a straight line despite the main unit type’s title(Line Infantry DOH). My second gripe was Shogun 2… Yea they vastly improved the campaign ai yet again what did we hear? “The AI will mimic Sun Tzu’s Art of War”(another LMFAO). What did the battles look like again? Oh yea that’s right SLOPPY MINDLESS BRAWLS!! Online mode for christ’s sake played like an arcade game.

    I also wanted to point out that in past TW games the AI doesn’t have the ability to coherently unify it’s units and fight as a single formation or prioritize immediate threats to it’s army(These faults were improved a bit in shogun2) Go ahead play empire total war and see how the AI handles troop movement. It literally cannot march it’s 20m without colliding all of it’s units together into a big sloppy mess the AI completely lacks the ability to synchronize multi unit movements into a intelligible formation and if it manages to perform this simple task it cannot play off this formation and make any flanking attacks, encirclements, or counter attacks.

    From day 1 AI has never been the hallmark of the TW series and I doubt it ever will. The fact that the most downloaded mods for ETW were mods that attempted to fix the broken AI says it all. We were promised Napoleon…. We got mentally disabled gorilla formations….We were promised Sun Tzu and then we got a gigantic mob.

    #2 9 months ago
  3. wal_martian

    After watching that snippet video a few times I just saw something that particularly disgusted me.

    5:48…..Watch the formation crumble under the weight of it’s own….movement?? Wait a minute I thought roman’s were renowned for their ability to fight as a UNIT dammit!! Even though this is a minor qualm I still want to see my ROMAN soldiers fight as ROMANS. This weird individual unit formation scramble ups seem to be a very common element within the warscape engine. I didn’t see this odd behavior pre warscape engine. Now it appears as if many soldiers can occupy the space that only 1 soldier in real life could possibly occupy. This isn’t a roman maniple and that’s a sad sad thing.

    #3 9 months ago