Sections

The Peanut Gallery: why can’t developers answer critics?

Wednesday, 5 September 2012 11:31 GMT By Brenna Hillier

After years of work, your video game is finally on the streets – but now anybody with a keyboard is allowed to tear it to pieces. Why aren’t you allowed to respond? Brenna Hillier calls for dialogue between critics and creators.

The idea of a developer, publisher or PR person daring to have an opinion on the quality and accuracy of a review – why, it’s untenable. It’s a crime against free speech. It’s a smack at critical integrity. It’s wilful manipulation of the sacred process of games reviewing in which only diamond nuggets of truth are ever brought to life, deposited in the velvet cases of Metacritic’s luxurious showroom where their sparkle attracts flocks of admiring consumers. What a load of old wank.

“Is there any way to write an email to a reviewer and say ‘hey, I don’t think you got it’ or ‘you missed something’ without being a PR jerk?” Harmonix’s communications and brand manager John Drake asked on Twitter last week – presumably in response to a negative review of the recently-released Rock Band Blitz.

Because Drake is a consummate professional, his question was largely rhetorical – it’s not the Done Thing to complain about your review scores, and when “a PR jerk” does it (or a non-jerk is asked to by a jerky manager) everyone on both sides is rendered acutely uncomfortable.

Drake’s friends and colleagues in PR sympathised with the frustration of negative reviews, but when I broached the topic with other games media pundits, it became apparent that on the writing side, there’s far less empathy. The idea of a developer, publisher or PR person daring to have an opinion on the quality and accuracy of a review – why, it’s untenable. It’s a crime against free speech. It’s a smack at critical integrity. It’s wilful manipulation of the sacred process of games reviewing in which only diamond nuggets of truth are ever brought to life, deposited in the velvet cases of Metacritic’s luxurious showroom where their sparkle attracts flocks of admiring consumers.

What a load of old wank. Who died and made game reviewers perfect judges of what makes a good game? The fact is reviewers do sometimes get it wrong.

Even putting aside the myriad questions which plague reviewing in general, a video game isn’t like a book or movie which you might go through half a dozen times for a really thorough review; it’s something you could invest hundreds of hours in and still be surprised by. In a perfect world, all critics would have months to play and assess games before delivering their reviews; I don’t want to go into details of the business of games media, but the unfortunate reality is many reviewers don’t get anything like the time they need.

Even ignoring time constraints, it’s easy enough to overlook details. This is one reason publishers often provide fact sheets with review code; rushing through a tremendously long game like Darksiders 2, for example, it would be very easy to completely miss the existence of the Crucible altogether, and write a snarky paragraph about how the game fails to provide a decent combat challenge for advanced players. This is not an unlikely scenario; this kind of error creeps into reviews all the time. I have seen a colleague declare a tactics game “broken” in a published review because he didn’t RTFM and played for hours without finding the core command menu.

Quite apart from embarrassing factual errors like these, sometimes reviewers simply won’t “get” a game due to personal preference or inexperience. Think of the way people react to Dark Souls; some love it, some spend five minutes with it and can’t see the point at all. Imagine me trying to review a racer – “you just go round in circles, three out of ten”. Presumably editors do their best to match games to critics within a game’s target audience but there will always be times when for some reason – you’re having a bad day, you’ve had an overload of a particular genre – a game just does not sit well with you, and you never grow to like it. People who get paid to write reviews aren’t exempt from this phenomenon, even though many do their best to avoid it.

If only negative reviews were this funny,
maybe they wouldn’t sting.

When a development team of several dozen people spend years working on a product, it’s understandable that they might become emotional when it is criticised, especially subjectively. But when some neckbeard drops the Metacritic average below a publisher’s target and has obviously misunderstood a central mechanic, failed to take in a decent portion of the game, or otherwise unintentionally dropped the ball – well. That’s heartbreaking.

When it happens, why is the designer, developer or publisher expected to just put up with it? Why can’t we open a line of dialogue and have a conversation? I’m not talking about PR reps on the phone hassling critics about their review scores, but developers and critics communicating with each other comfortably on a topic that presumably interests them both – games. If new information can change a critic’s mind, then surely they’d prefer that to looking like a bit of a tool by issuing an unfair review. Let’s do it in public: let’s allow developers space to rebut critics. Hell, let the critics respond in turn – let’s talk about this.

We don’t do reviews at VG247 for several reasons (which is a whole other editorial). If we’ve got a game ahead of its release and think you might want to know what we think we sometimes tell you, but we’re always aware of and hopefully clear on what we’re actually doing. We’re not saying “we know this game inside out and can make universal judgments on it”. We’re just telling you what we, as regular people who play games, think about it. And we’re more than happy to accept that we could be wrong – for you in particular, or in general. We’re human. We’re fallible. Is it so unthinkable that our colleagues might be, too?

Rock Band Blitz holds a 76 Metacritic Average on Xbox 360; “generally favorable”. Scores range from 60 to 93.

Latest

  • “Zero percent of people get motion sick,” says Gabe Newell about Vive

    Valve has apparently broke through and found a solution to the VR motion sickness issue with its headset Vive. According to Gabe Newell, Valve has solved the issue of nausea associated usually with virtual reality headsets. Speaking to the New York Times, Gabe Newell said that “zero percent of people get motion sick.” The reason, […]

  • MGS5: The Phantom Pain development update from Kojima

    Metal Gear Solid creator Hideo Kojima has revealed many details during last night’s Kojima Station live-stream. Yesterday, Kojima hosted another episode of Kojima Station, the show that reveals a few MGS5: The Phantom Pain details every time it airs. It’s always in Japanese though, which makes it hard for those of us who don’t speak […]

  • Steam Machine prices: from $480 all the way up to $5,000

    The prices of Steam Machines vary wildly. You could pay less than $500, or ten times more. Since Steam now has hardware pages for each manufacturer’s Steam Machine, it makes sense to go through them and see what the average price is. The full list of manufacturers includes names like Alienware, Digital Storm, Asus, Gigabyte, […]

  • Dreadnought screens are filled with lasers and explosions

    Dreadnought just keeps looking better and better every time we see it. Spaceship fighting simulator Dreadnought has produced a new set of screens to help you parse all the action. If you like what you see, you can check out ten minutes of equally-explosive gameplay. The screens are captured from a pre-alpha build and were […]

  • Bloodborne: tons of new PvP, co-op, and item details

    The Japanese site of Bloodborne has been updated with tons of new info pertaining to PvP, summoning, co-op, and much more. Bloodborne’s Japanese site was recently updated to bring into light many of the game’s features, and how some of them differ from earlier Souls games. According to translation by DualShockers the game supports up […]

  • Destiny: Xur location and inventory for March 6, 7 – Ice Breaker edition

    Xur: Agent of the Nine has brought a new set of Exotic wares to Destiny’s Tower. Xur: Agent of the Nine is back again to the Tower for another weekend of Exotic adventure. Xur will sell you Exotic weapons and armour in exchange for your Strange Coins and Motes of Light. Exotic Shards and upgraded […]

  • 30 new GTA Online screens show two Heists

    We’ve got a batch of hot new Heist screens from GTA Online that you wouldn’t want to miss. There are quite a lot of screens here showing all sorts of activities, pre-heist, during, and the getaway. Most of them are from the Humane heist, but others show one taking place at Fleeca Bank. Many details […]

  • BoingBoing’s Offworld resurrected as new, diverse gaming blog

    Offworld is back, but not as you know it. Offworld was Boing Boing’s gaming blog, helmed by Brandon Boyer from 2008. By 2010 it had been rolled into Boing Boing itself, eventually falling mostly silent and in 2011 Boyer founded a new site, Venus Patrol. The brand has languished unused ever since, but Boing Boing’s […]

  • SimCity developer: “EA is actually a great place to work these days”

    The Sims 4 developer Maxis may have been shuttered, but at least one former employee doesn’t have beef with EA and its decision. Although The Sims 4 and SimCity will continue along with the studio’s brand, the flagship Maxis studios has been closed. The closure prompted a resurgence of interest in EA’s acquisitions; there was […]

  • Humble Weekly Bundle goes monochromatic

    The theme of the latest Humble Weekly Bundle is “monochrome” – every game features a black and white aesthetic. Pay what you want for The Bridge (Linux, Mac, PC; Steam or DRM-free), Closure (Linux, Mac, PC; Steam or DRM-free) and Dominique Pamplemousse (Mac, PC; Steam or DRM-free). Cough up more than the average – $4.09 […]

  • Final Fantasy 7′s nine-disc, open-world fan sequel was too beautiful to live

    This Final Fantasy 7 sequel put together by fans shows off just how flexible Squaresoft’s tech was. Final Fantasy 7: Time Guardian was a fan-made sequel to the classic RPG, developed by Japanese indie Rodensoft. What makes it different from other FF7 fan projects is that it was being developed in the same engine as […]

  • Half-life 3 in VR: “We’re not saying no,” says Valve

    Half-life might work in virtual reality, or it might not. That’s Valve’s stance on the matter. Half-life 3 in VR makes perfect sense and should definitely happen, but Valve says it hasn’t made any decisions yet. “We’re not saying, ‘no’ but we don’t know what the right thing is [yet],” Valve programmer Jeep Barnett told […]

  • Why Diablo 3 had such a bad launch

    Diablo 3 is now a byword in disastrous launches for online-only games. How did Blizzard mess it up so badly? Diablo 3 game to us from a developer with experience running one of the world’s biggest massively multiplayer online games – World of Warcraft – and the infrastructure to back it up. So why were […]

  • ID@Xbox: “no problem” if devs can’t sim-ship, says Xbox indie boss

    ID@Xbox boss Chris Charla has said the famous parity clause isn’t as draconian as it sounds. Back when ID@Xbox was first launched, it was said to have a pretty unpleasant caveat: developers had to bring their games to Xbox One first, or simultaneously with other platforms, to be eligible for the scheme. Games released on […]

  • Microsoft working with Sony and Nintendo to combat DDoS attacks

    Xbox Live may be a rival to the PSN and Nintendo Network, but that doesn’t mean Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo can’t work together. Xbox boss Phil Spencer has said that he’s been talking to Sony, Nintendo and other companies about keeping gaming networks stable in the face of DDoS attacks and other malicious activity. Speaking […]

  • Destiny animations are designed to reduce motion sickness

    Destiny developers worked hard to avoid one of the common pitfalls of first-person games – motion sickness. Destiny senior animator David Helsby gave a presentation at GDC 2015 in which he discussed the challenges of animating first-person games. The problem with fist-person perspective is that if the camera bobs naturally as your head does, some […]

  • Xbox One peripherals will work wirelessly with Windows 10 via adapter

    Microsoft has announced a new adapter allowing you to use Xbox One peripherals with your PC. Announced at GDC, the adapter will allow you to use your Xbox One controller to play PC games, without having to have a USB cable stretched between the two. “The wireless devices you use on Xbox One will work […]

  • Pokemon developer, Sega collaboration teased

    Pokemon developer Game Freak is apparently working on something with Sega. The Sega Twitter published the following teaser image this week: pic.twitter.com/12XtR6f9LM — SEGA (@SEGA) March 5, 2015 Game Freak is, of course, the team behind the Pokemon games, and we often forget that it’s independent rather than a Nintendo studio. As such, whatever the […]

  • Rock Band 4 “feels almost like coming home”, says Harmonix

    Rock Band 4 has been a long time coming, and Harmonix is as excited as we are. Or it would be, if that were possible. Harmonix announced Rock Band 4 overnight to massive excitement, especially in the vicinity of me. It’s something we’ve all been waiting for, but no less has Harmonix been waiting for […]

  • Destiny Weekly Update – what’s coming in the pre-House of Wolves patch?

    Destiny guru Arekkz Gaming runs down what Bungie’s mysterious update means – and could mean. This week’s Destiny Weekly Update was kind of light on information, but sometimes even saying nothing is really saying something. What are your theories for what’s coming soon to Destiny?

  • Ashes of the Singularity is “the most advanced RTS ever”, says Stardock

    Stardock has revealed Ashes of the Singularity, a new take on sci-fi RTS. Ashes of the Singularity is described as “not an RTS battle, an RTS war” which sounds pretty exciting. Built on Oxide Games’ Nitrous Engine, Ashes of the Singularity boasts of thousands of units on screen at a time, each with multiple targeted […]

  • Disgaea 5: meet Zeroken and Christo

    Disgaea 5 developer Nippon Ichi has dropped a ton of new information regarding its next RPG. Disgaea 5: Alliance of Vengeance is coming to PS4 in Japan this month ahead of its western launch in northern autumn. Gematsu has gathered all the latest intel on the RPG from a recent Nippon Ichi press release. Head […]

  • Skyworld VR strategy game looks kind of like playing with toys

    Skyworld is a new turn based strategy designed for use with VR headsets. Skyworld comes to us from Vertigo Games, and will be compatible with Valve’s Vive headset. IGN reports Vertigo has worked in close collaboration with the SteamVR project, so Skyworld will support both seated VR and full-room features. Think about that while you […]

  • Link and Ganon battle in new Legend of Zelda fan film

    The Legend of Zelda fans are clearly a very clever bunch. The production values on this Legend of Zelda fan film are through the roof. This is only the teaser, with the full movie from PlayerPiano to follow, and we’re pretty excited. By the way, Netflix is said to be working up a Live action […]

  • Underworld Ascendent backers unlock Lizardmen, more stretch goals available in final hours

    Underworld Ascendent’s Kickstarter has just 15 hours left on the clock, but backers have already unlocked some great stretch goals. One of the latest Underworld Ascendent stretch goal milestones was $750,000. By passing this post, backers have ensured the inclusion of Lizardmen in the final game. Developer Otherside will now add the Dire Grove environment […]

  • Early Access version of MX vs. ATV Supercross Encore lands on Steam

    MX vs. ATV Supercross Encore has landed on Steam Early Access. The game popped up on Amazon last month for PlayStation 4 before Nordic Games had the chance to announce it was reviving the former-THQ property for current-gen. It still hasn’t by the way, to our knowledge. According to information sent over today, the initial […]

  • Avalanche is making sure Mad Max stays “true to the collective body of work”

    Mad Max developer’s Avalanche Studios sat down with Game Informer, as part of its month-long exclusive coverage, to discuss the game’s development and physics-based car combat. In the video below, director Frank Rooke and senior producer John Fuller explain the process of designing the open-world game; how the narrative was fully integrated into the gameplay […]

  • Destiny will get another update before House of Wolves drops

    Destiny got a major update with patch 1.1.1 last week, but Bungie isn’t done. The next major Destiny update will arrive before the House of Wolves expansion. In this week’s Bungie Weekly Update, the developer said it wasn’t ready to share details yet. However, more information will be shared in the coming weeks. The update […]

  • A beta version of Guild Wars 2′s streaming client releasing soon

    ArenaNet has announced a beat version of its streaming client for Guild Wars 2 will be released alongside its upcoming update. How it works is explained in the latest blog post, but in short, it gets players into the game faster, much the same way the streaming client works in World of Warcraft. “Our goal […]

  • Steam storefront updated with Steam Machines, other product pages

    Valve has updated the Steam storefront with a list of various Steam Machines on offer, which range from $460 to $5,000. There is also a store page for the Steam Controller and Steam Link, both of which are out in November for $49.99 each. Steam Machines listed on the service feature a link to the […]

71 Comments

  1. Freek

    The problem starts and ends with recognizing what a review is: a personal, subjective opinion. There is nothing to correct.
    If the person writing it diden’t understand the game or diden’t like it, those are perfectly valid opinions to have. It’s the same reaction a person buying it can have.
    They too can not like, they too can miss a menu or not understand the game.
    It’s good that reviews are a range from all those different perspectives and reactions, that makes them worth reading.
    If everybody came together and agreed upon a single score and opinion to have, you might aswell stop.

    Stop seeing reviews as scientific measurements of quality and the problem solves itself. Also: immidiatly stop awarding bonusses based on the utter nonsense that is meta critic. It is not a measurement of wether a person has done a good job, it’s a subjective collection of opinions, interesting but not meaningfull.

    Expecting to open up a line of dailogue between developers and the people covering games is a nice idea, but utterly futile. The two sides are at war with each other.
    Developers are too quick to brush off legitimate criticm as “they just don’t get the game”, while “game journalism” is a race to create a contraversy over every little thing a developer says.
    You keep that up and people naturally stop talking to each other. Add in a PR factor that wants total control over a games public perception and you’re stuck.

    #1 3 years ago
  2. unacomn

    I agree that some reviewers are more or less aholes when it comes to the games they review, mostly ones that don’t have a lot of PR behind them. They tend to try and get away with lazy reviews made after a few minutes of play time, spewed out on the internet and on Metacritic, without being fact checked. Not to name names, but Eric Neigher.

    The review system could surely benefit from more dialogue, the problem is a lot of the people involved aren’t interested in dialogue, publisher, producer and writer. Generally, the higher up the tower of cash you go, the more ego is involved in all sides. Smaller companies are very much interested in dialogue, to the point where I didn’t even have to tell them about my review of their game, they found it and corrected me on a mistake I had made. And it goes both ways, when I do my best to offer constructive feedback on what doesn’t work well, it’s take into consideration a few patches later.

    But that’s on the mid-low level. Higher up, I’m just some nobody that’s not on Metacritic.

    #2 3 years ago
  3. Dave Cook

    Too many devs and publishers have forgotten that 5 is an average score. It’s half of ten, literally, and they have forgotten that.

    I know for a fact during my years that publishers give some devs a Metacritic target to aim for. If that target isn’t met the game has been considered a waste of effort, money and time.

    If your target is 95% and you get 90% or even 85% that is deemed as not good enough. I for one can’t stand Metacritic’s stranglehold on the review process. I know others like it so I’m just speaking personally.

    Then there’s the time I got an angry call from Warner for giving Mortal Kombat 6/10. That wasn’t fun.

    #3 3 years ago
  4. unacomn

    @Dave Cook 5 is not an average score. 5 is whatever the person seeing that 5 thinks that 5 is. Everyone’s numerical scale means something else, therefore it can not be aggregated. That’s the reason I tend to also add vegetable ratings to my reviews, because they make about as much sense as the numbers to.

    For me a 5 is a “meeh” game, and for reference a 1 is a “proof there is no God”, while a 10 is “I want to establish a religion based around this”.

    #4 3 years ago
  5. Dave Cook

    @4 No I agree with what you’re saying, but what I meant was that the scale should be normalised somehow. 5 is literally half of ten right, and games used to be scored and viewed as such.

    Now the perception is that anything less than 8 is utter shite. Which is a skewed and warped view on the spectrum.

    I’ve played many 6/10 games that I still found enjoyable. The scoring scale is ruined now in my opinion. That’s why I prefer giving no scores in my reviews now.

    #5 3 years ago
  6. silkvg247

    I think critics tend to forget actual real people work very hard on the games. it’s one thing to give a fair criticism but another entirely to be downright rude, something I’ve seen quite a lot after releasing my game on greenlight.

    #6 3 years ago
  7. Dave Cook

    @6 Yes, I absolutely agree with this ^

    #7 3 years ago
  8. unacomn

    @Dave Cook
    A standardized score system would do us all a lot of good, though coming up with one for a system as complex as a game is daunting at best. I agree with not assigning scores to reviews if you have the option.
    Vegetables are also a good alternative

    #8 3 years ago
  9. manamana

    @DC And I absolutely salute you for your 5/10 commentary, as there are several games I like to play that scored 5,6 and 7s. But only those above 8 will get the attention in the massmarket. Everything below isn’t even worth mentioning and wont be advertised. And that is really unfair towards the developers and the games, who often are quite fun. And I’m not talking about broken games here.

    #9 3 years ago
  10. Dave Cook

    @8 Forgot to say actually, I love the vegetable scoring system :D

    How does it work? What’s the ‘worst’ vegetable score? Sprouts? I hate Sprouts.

    #10 3 years ago
  11. absolutezero

    http://youtu.be/yNUwqoOYzGw

    When Games Journalism thinks that this is acceptable then I think its time for the companies these idiots are passing judgement on to stand up for themselves.

    Its about time someone in the industry told Jim Sterling to go fuck himself.

    The reason 5 is not the average standard is more or less down to IGN. Its either amazing or its terrible. Theres no middle ground, because if things are grey, if things are a little bit complicated then you get people complaining. Then they go somewhere else to read black and white reviews to make up what they should be getting angry about, or praising.

    #11 3 years ago
  12. bitsnark

    @6

    I also agree with this.

    My issue is the same that Dave alluded to earlier. It just didn’t occur to me that *so* many folks believe that any game lower than 8/10 is a pile of shit.

    Seriously.

    I was blown away by it when I submitted my 7/10 Darksiders 2 review. I had people, no scratch that; scoremonkeys, calling the score an insult to the people who developed it despite the fact that the body of text was largely glowing and complimentary in a number of areas.

    For the record, I wasn’t rude or derogatory and my criticisms were articulated quite respectfully.

    In my opinion a standardised score system would be a good thing to have, but until then, sites should clearly outline their scoring criteria so people don’t get the wrong impression.

    So that way, if people continue to bitch and whine that a game ‘only’ got 7/10, they should drink a nice, tall glass of shut the fuck up with a side order of perspective.

    #12 3 years ago
  13. Dave Cook

    @12 I know that feeling all too well. I fully understand – as the majority of reviewers do, trust me – the effort that goes into games. You have to be stupid not to. But say something bad about a game fans like and all of a sudden you’re either a fan boy, corrupt, unintelligent or just plain don’t deserve a job in the industry.

    I used to find it utterly heartbreaking to read some of the violent comments aimed at me for writing a review. But you really have to try and live with it. It still happens today in fact.

    Same issue though – say you like a game at review and you are either being bribed, paid off or are also an unintelligent idiot.

    The system is knackered. Scoreless reviews are the way forward.

    #13 3 years ago
  14. absolutezero

    Also Metacritic only served to make EVERYTHING worse, for both sides.

    I can’t see a single positive benefit to the existence of Metacritic.

    #14 3 years ago
  15. bitsnark

    @14

    Me neither.

    #15 3 years ago
  16. unacomn

    @Dave Cook

    Not really sure myself how it works, still being a work in progress. I based it on taste and the general perception of vegetables. The Old Republic was a tomato, because no matter if it’s a fruit or vegetable, it’s still a tomato, everyone’s tasted a tomato, it’s good tomato, but it’s still a tomato.

    The Secret World got garlic, because it can sting a bit, and it may be an acquired taste, but it’s pleasant and wards off vampires.

    And I think the last Spider-Man game got the last pea in the pod, as in it’s like all the other ones, but more recent.

    Minecraft got a pig, which I’m sure will be considered a vegetable one day.

    Haven’t given a bad vegetable score yet. I try to save them for special occasions, was also thinking of expanding to fruit and condiments. I also mention that I wrote most of these when I was hungry.

    #16 3 years ago
  17. jamjam

    Really good article Brenna.

    From the developer side, a lot of the reason we’re not allowed to talk to reviewers is because of the hierarchy that exists within the development studio. The people who are ‘allowed’ are the Leads, Producers and Studio Heads, and they’re often under a lot of pressure from the publisher’s PR branch to remain quiet because they’re the ones who control the flow of information.

    It makes sense, but equally it does suck.

    Regarding scores, no matter how many times we try to say 5/10 is average it’s the simple truth that it’s not: 7/10 is perceived as average and there’s a lot of pressure to be getting 8/10′s as a minimum. Weightings on the validity of the reviews should be introduced to Metacritic, based on past reliability (I believe there is a site for reviewing reviewers, though I can’t remember what it is right now).

    #17 3 years ago
  18. Dave Cook

    @16 amazing, I love it :)

    @17 Agreed, and in a perfect world that perception would be changed, but it’s not going to happen any time soon.

    #18 3 years ago
  19. Ireland Michael

    @6 Sometimes rude is all you can be.

    Reviewing is my primary (and favourite) form of journalism. Of the recent stuff I’ve done, there was no earthly way in hell I was able to review The Amazing Spider-Man in any sort of positive light. It was shockingly bad. How else was I supposed to critique the game?

    Then there’s this little thing called opinions. I think Hideo Kojima is a terrible writing and I would mark his games down because of the fact. Try putting that in a publicly promoted review though? You get eaten alive. I have a tough skin for that sort of stuff, but the rampant arrogance of the gaming “community” is just as much to blame for these problems.

    I would love to see developers talk out and defend their products and opinions though. They should have as much right as to express their opinions as the critics do. Then again, we all know what happens in this industry when someone is honest about their opinions…

    We can all say they should do this, but as soon as someone does, it turns into a witch hunt.

    @13 Scores don’t need to be abolished. The media just needs to grow some balls of their own and stop being manipulated by the publishers into being their personal bitches.

    #19 3 years ago
  20. Dave Cook

    @13

    “Scores don’t need to be abolished. The media just needs to grow some balls of their own and stop being manipulated by the publishers into being their personal bitches”

    That rarely happens in my personal experience though man. It’s genuinely because the perception of what is good and what is average has become horribly warped. I’ve never let a publisher influence my opinion, not once and I say that truthfully. I’ve never seen it happen first hand either.

    That’s the perception of many gamers and it’s – in the majority – wrong. I’m sure there are unethical reviewers out there, but blanket statements like this do the hard-working honest guys a disservice.

    But that’s not your fault man, it’s the perceived image, and it needs to change soon.

    #20 3 years ago
  21. absolutezero

    Phil Fish was’nt called out because he voiced a negative opinion about something he was called out because hes a massive cock. Theres a difference between voicing an opinion and being a cock. He was a cock and thus people called him one.

    #21 3 years ago
  22. Ireland Michael

    @21 Damned if you do. Damned if you don’t.

    #22 3 years ago
  23. Dragon246

    Reviews are opinions, anyone who thinks they are more than that is a fool. Also I get that pubs shouldn’t decide incomes of devs based on metacritic, but I dont think metacritic is inherently bad. Average opinions tend the show if a game is good or bad.
    For eg.- A gives a game 2. C,D give it 7, D gives it 10. Now an average no. will tell people that more people have liked the game. Individual reviews can be biased (they are always biased, based on personal opinions), metacritic generally isnt. No person can give an unbiased review, only a machine can.
    Although I think metacritic should release scores only after atleast 15-20 reviews (not 4),as less reviews defeat its purpose.

    #23 3 years ago
  24. G1GAHURTZ

    I once worked on a game that had one review from a website, that shall remain nameless, which had loads of good things to say about it, but then proceeded to give it a 7, because it apparently lacked “soul”.

    What’s that?

    “Soul”, you say?

    Needless to say, when the review went around the studio, there was an immediate investigation to try and find out exactly who it was that forgot to put the “soul” in.

    I mean, seriously… How arbitrary is that!?

    ‘Yeah, this game’s really good, but there’s just not enough soul.’

    Now, as a developer, how exactly are you supposed to respond to that?

    A journalist is always going to defend his position, and a dev/publisher is always going to push for a better review.

    But when you get nonsense like, ‘your game lacks soul’, trying to communicate is just a waste of time.

    #24 3 years ago
  25. GwynbleiddiuM

    It’s media’s fault to begin with, they shouldn’t have adding measures to validate their opinion on a game. It’s just that, a review should be consistent of an article that provides insight on how a product works with all its pros and cons. That’s about it. Adding measures like 80%, 9 out of 10, 4 stars, etc was the day that media critics failed to be fair and unbiased.

    PRs use everything to their advantage, and when they can’t do that they get their feelings involved, another way to influence public reaction, by taking advantage over sympathy.

    I read reviews, and when I disagree with a reviewer’s opinion, I wont go on the internet and QQ over it. It’s just an opinion of someone who played, or watched or listened or tasted a product and did or didn’t like the product. That’s that, no reason to get depressed over it.

    #25 3 years ago
  26. Dave Cook

    @25 ‘Adding measures like 80%, 9 out of 10, 4 stars, etc was the day that media critics failed to be fair and unbiased.’

    Couldn’t have said it better myself, that’s why I’m glad to be at a point where I no longer have to score things. I never liked putting numbers to quantify a 2,000 word review. It’s not a true measure of what you’ve just told the reader.

    #26 3 years ago
  27. OlderGamer

    How many game buyers want to buy an ok game? How many are going to get “preorder” excited about an average game? They as consumers want that game to be “amazing” thats one of the things that convinces them that buying it was a worth idea in the first place.

    Pubs know that.

    And pubs use that score to push the game.

    Stores love it. It creates a buzz and that drives sales.

    It is just hype. Selling games has a lot to do with the hype bizz.

    And everyone benifits.

    The websites doing the reviews can hype the game as awesome and people want to read coverage on that said awesome game. Also doing that, gains them a rep with PUBs(who pay advertising on said website). Win win for the site.

    Stores love it, again it drives sales. And that makes them money and more importantly makes them relevent. You can’t hype a Digital console game the same way you can a retail physical package.

    Pubs like it because a good score sells copies. Esp, where yearly franchises are concerned. if Blops one sells, count on Blops 2 getting made(helps devs too, in that way).

    And lastly end consumers like it because a high score helps them feel conected and cool(the root for most fanboy cases), and it helps them internaly justify spending the money.

    The entire cycle feed itself.

    I don’t think it is entirely needed on all platforms. Look at Minecraft, how much hype went into the PC version? How about when Angry Birds launched? But on a console…never ever going to change.

    #27 3 years ago
  28. SplatteredHouse

    scoreless reviews, yes…that golden nugget again. The thing is, that none of the busier places ever actually adopt the practice. They don’t trial it, for all the lip service.
    Metacritic scores being taken as anything more than what they are: A digest of links to many and varied opinions on what you may be interested in, is just silly. The weight that they’re given is daft, for what they are.

    There aren’t absolutes. One outlet may review game X, while the other does not – if the first outlet didn’t rate your game, you’re not going to in the case, benefit from the potential positive of the second outlet, whose reviewer may have found it more appealing. Result: lower %
    (so, publishers brought in “review guides” to direct traffic)

    As to reviews themselves, they provide me the benefit of the opinion of someone who’s had hands-on time with the game, to the point they feel they can make, and qualify an opinion.
    The way I read reviews is: scroll down to the score, first. Because, it informs to the amount of interest I will have in the lump of text that precedes it. If 1)the game’s interesting; and, 2) the score hasn’t spelled out, blatantly, the case – then I’ll go back and read the opinion and see how well it’s built to whether it looks like it can be relied upon. (If I’ve got as far as clicking to the full article, 9/10 times I’ll go through the review)

    I don’t really have a problem with developers pointing out omissions and oversights, but the horror stories, such as the one Jim Sterling retold about how Saber Interactive were angry at him for his Hydrophobia view, to the point their PR were haranguing the site’s editor, his boss, over it, leaving messages and all that…Not on.

    If they want a voice, they too, must be able to employ it responsibly. Address the person directly, not try to blow things up (for ex, on social media) to where sites feel its relevent to call out a perceived encroachment around their review process, and the influence of the outside parties (as far as critiquing) is no longer seen as beneficial. But, I’m all for that happening, in theory.

    #28 3 years ago
  29. DSB

    I think Brennas article misses a lot of key points.

    Like Freek says, reviews are opinion, so you’re really only getting it wrong when you fail to express one, which is really the biggest problem the games press has right now.

    Instead of celebrating the fact that someone brings a bit of variety to the selection of reviews, they get slammed for bringing down a Metacritic score, with the argument (as it is expressed here) that publishers have decided to let that broken system decide the fate of their developers.

    … And somehow both Metacritic, with their broken methodology, and the publishers manage to walk off without a single word of criticism ever being printed against them.

    That’s really the problem of the games press, squared.

    No one wants to critisize, no one wants to analyze, and no one wants to investigate. They just want to point fingers, send off one-liners, come up with spiffy tabloid headlines, and hand the next review whatever score they feel will keep their editors, and their readers off their backs.

    In a word, it’s useless. It’s so far below the standard of any other form of media criticism, it qualifies as a parody.

    @26 Ultimately you might say that a review qualifies just by being “positive or negative”, but I think the problem with a lot of the scales is that they’re just nonsensical.

    There aren’t ten different categories of quality, let alone a hundred like Metacritic suggests. It always becomes some kind of esoteric mess where the scale ends up meaning all kinds of things, to all kinds of people.

    I’m fine with a five scale personally. It takes out the comfortable middle ground, it forces the reviewer to form an opinion for or against, and personally I have an easy time placing games in all five categories.

    #29 3 years ago
  30. Joe Musashi

    I think a lot of people don’t know how to be critics. Gaming culture is very good at going straight to DEFCON5 in the blink of an eye when something displeases it.

    There is a big difference between criticism and negativity.

    It’s rarely constructive or helpful to engage in negativity.

    JM

    #30 3 years ago
  31. DSB

    Criticism may be positive, and it may be negative. Both can be constructive.

    #31 3 years ago
  32. Dave Cook

    @29 ‘There aren’t ten different categories of quality, let alone a hundred like Metacritic suggests.’

    Exactly. Everyone’s barometer is different. Well said.

    #32 3 years ago
  33. Cobra951

    @the conversation about scores: 50% is not average in this context. Remember when you went to school? So does everyone else. So does every gamer. 50% is a failing grade. 70% is barely acceptable. 80% is good. 90% and up is excellent. It is a scale deeply ingrained in our psyches during childhood. Is it so surprising that it has carried over to game reviews?

    If you don’t adhere to the expected top-heavy scale, don’t complain that Metacritic is aggregating your score incorrectly. You are the one who didn’t play well with others.

    #33 3 years ago
  34. Ireland Michael

    @29 “No one wants to critisize, no one wants to analyze, and no one wants to investigate. They just want to point fingers, send off one-liners, come up with spiffy tabloid headlines, and hand the next review whatever score they feel will keep their editors, and their readers off their backs*

    *raises hand*

    #34 3 years ago
  35. PsiMonk

    OK, so I’m a games (and other stuff) reviewer for mainstream media. And I find this entire ongoing debate simultaneously fascinating and frustrating in equal measure.

    1. As others have said, blaming journalists for metacritic makes no sense.
    i) The existence of metacritic does not mean you or anyone else has to use it – but they do, because, simply, it’s a really quick and handy way of telling what critical consensus is for a game. And only vary rarely (Dark Souls etc.) does that not give a good overall flavour of a game.
    ii) Why do sites put scores on stuff? Because they get more hits. Because most readers want a quick fix. Some sites serve a niche audience that will tolerate or even positively respond to a lack of score. But scores are the mainstream – and not just in games.
    iii) No one forces publishers to use metacritic as a rod to beat developers with. But lets be honest here, if it wasn’t metacritic, it’d be something else. Now, I’d argue, the things that would make more sense to incentivise/punish devs is either sales units or profit. Either of those are directly linked to how “good” a game is for a pub. Critical reception often isn’t (see FIFA for years and years).

    2. Readers are idiots, devs are idiots, publishers are idiots and, yes, journalists like me are idiots.
    i) For online sites, I’ve literally had a review drubbing a PS3 exclusive going up the same day as a review drubbing an Xbox 360 exclusive. And on those reviews I was respectively called a hater or a fanboy of the rival console. Readers are idiots – far too many think that if you don’t like *their* game you’re wrong. Reviews are an opinion.
    ii) Devs and publishers are idiots – yes, we know you put years of toil into your game, but I guess just like I’ll never be Hunter S Thomson, you’ll never be Shigeru Miyamoto. So don’t expect his reviews. The number of times I’ve seen (I also work as a copywriter) confidential documents on games briefings that reveal metacritic scores – that are clearly completely out of whack with the game being created – is saddening. Devs, do not sign up to a contract you can’t fulfill. Pubs, do not treat devs as if they can all be Miyamoto – set realistic goals. And don’t blame us if your game gets a bad review.
    iii) Finally, the entire games press – we’re idiots. We’ve collectively allowed ourselves to be treated like monkeys and paid peanuts for too long. Websites and games specialist mags pay shockingly poorly – because they know there’s an army of amateur writers itching to get into games. But the end result is we have few genuinely great writers (actually, several are on VG247, to be fair) in the industry and too many fanboys who have too few critical faculties. Even the good writers accept too little pay and the entire media accept work conditions that simply don’t happen in other entertainment industries. For instance, film screenings are often months in advance of the film release date. Imagine that happening for games – it’d mean reviews where the writer had time to finish and enjoy the game, not race through it ignoring anything optional or any side-quest.

    Until the entire industry sorts out this collective mess of low expectations of propriety, intelligence and debate, we’re screwed basically.

    So, should devs be able to query reviews? Of course – but let’s be clear about the difference between factual errors and opinion differences.

    Here’s to a better games industry – better games, better dialogue and higher aspirations towards, y’know, art and stuff.

    #35 3 years ago
  36. Dave Cook

    @35 ‘Even the good writers accept too little pay and the entire media accept work conditions that simply don’t happen in other entertainment industries’ – you just described the hell that was the last 2 and a half years of my life. Game journalists are constantly taken advantage of because of the nature of the job. The pay is an insult.

    That’s why I left my old job and moved here. I am ten times happier now.

    #36 3 years ago
  37. GrimRita

    Until companies like Eidos,EA, Sega, Activision etc etc stop blackmailing press sites (Kane/Lynch anyone?)by withholding advertising money, I am still stunned why anyone would believe a single review out there.

    So many games today score 9/10s or 10/10 when they are clearly not worth it – but then you see an advert for that game, and all becomes clear.

    I remember sitting across from a PR guy having an arguement over an extra point on a review score then exchanging first reveal on a triple A title, to get that extra point.

    #37 3 years ago
  38. DSB

    I think it’s generally better not to answer your critics.

    If there’s a general point to be made, and you can do it in a constructive way, then go for it, but you’re rarely going to do anything except make yourself look bitter and petty.

    The best thing a creator can do is let his work speak for itself.

    I’ve been a critic for the better part of 10 years, for music, and I actually had much the same problem early on.

    Artists would write me and complain about a score or a point I made, and in the beginning I would be desperate to try and make them understand, but ultimately all that, was all down to my own insecurity.

    We all have roles to play, and that’s the game.

    Some make music, others critisize it. Obviously there’d be no music critics without musicians, so my contribution to the world is essentially worthless, but thankfully music isn’t going anywhere, any time soon.

    I had a pretty cool experience, coming across a band discussing one of my reviews on Facebook, and I was very tempted to butt in and try to explain myself again, but I didn’t.

    One of them was complaining that they felt my review was too short, but within a day, one of their friends actually joined the discussion and defended my review, saying that I’d said all that needed saying.

    I think the best you can do is let it live on its own that way. If it’s good, people will know. You have to trust your own work.

    #38 3 years ago
  39. Dave Cook

    @37 that makes little sense. I’m not being harsh here honestly, but that’s not what happens. Publishers choose who to advertise with based on raw unique traffic numbers, not scores. That’s another popular misconception. Trust me on this one.

    But you are right in saying that once in a while, the odd 9/10 will appear that seems odd. It is incredibly rare however, rarer than you’d think.

    #39 3 years ago
  40. PsiMonk

    @36 Good for you! Until games journalists collectively learn their value, we’re doomed to sites stuffed with fanboys. It’s really sad seeing good writers struggle through that system – though I’m really glad they do.

    @37 Again, games publishers shouldn’t be tying advertising to editorial scores. But then editors shouldn’t accept that deal either. That said, I’ve never seen such deals. I have seen the whole “we won’t give you first review unless we get at least a 9/10″. But even that I’ve seen rarely – but I would rarely see that stuff, being a freelancer.

    #40 3 years ago
  41. Dave Cook

    @40 thanks :)

    I could tell you some depressing tales about the awful quality of life some journalists have had to suffer through because they got paid so little and overworked so much.

    #41 3 years ago
  42. bitsnark

    @36

    Luckily, games journalism for me is done as a purely voluntary activity and its for the largely shitty pay and conditions that I don’t think *personally*, that I would ever entertain it in a full-time capacity.

    For others though, who make their livelihood from it, I can well imagine the hells that they go through.

    Its funny how others can use your dream against you isn’t it?

    #42 3 years ago
  43. Dave Cook

    @42 yep, I moved from Scotland to England for the job and while the experience was valuable the bad pay made me start to resent games. It’s my life long passion and the moment I realised I was falling out of love with them was truly heartbreaking.

    It didn’t last though, I’m loving them more than ever now :)

    But yes, some companies are vampires who feed on honest people’s passion for their hobby. ‘oh we aren’t paying you enough? well I’m sure this free game will smooth things over until next month right?’

    People keep falling for it. From the outside this is the best job ever, the reality is just that, it’s a job. It’s challenging, but rewarding too if you can get a decent job at a fair company.

    #43 3 years ago
  44. ManuOtaku

    In my point of view, reviewers has some fault on this, because the meaning of the scale, whatever is use 10, 5, number of stars, etc, has been lost for quite some time now, especially since the last gen, when we are having each passing gen more and more top scores for games, i mean ten´s, five´s, stars, etc, which force them to low the scale one point so in reality 9 is the new 10, 8 is the new 9, and so forth, of course i use the 10 escale on this example, therefore the review scale is not accurate anymore, a top score should be for perfect games or games close to perfection, like in giminastics with 10 is being given for the perfect execution, one little miscue, means the top score is lost, the same should be in gaming scorings.

    Second, sometimes you read a review and it doesnt match the score, creating some problems sometimes it reads pretty good and you see a six, withoug mentionning any flaws, but on the other hand you see a review with a lot of flaws getting higher scores, so theres a lot of amibiguity, even if it is subjective, the score should represent the text of the review and viceversa.

    Lastly i think metacritic, should not be the messure for the success of a game, sales and worth of mouth, should be the messure, metacritic should be cease to exist IMHO.

    #44 3 years ago
  45. DSB

    I think the free stuff is one of the worst parts of the job. I have no use for a million cd’s that I’ve slammed in the past, or t-shirts from the bands who made them.

    I think the worst is when you get sent a “press copy” in a little sleeve, and people actually expect you to be thankful for that. It was made to be used and destroyed, a lot of shops give them out for free. Get over yourselves.

    To say nothing for press releases. I keep those for future reference, but I swear they were written by a random word generator, using a preset vocabulary made of PR-speak.

    #45 3 years ago
  46. PsiMonk

    @42 OK, so do you write for a games site or magazine etc that accepts advertising or for your own site or one that’s avowedly non-commercial?

    Hate to say this, but if you’re doing games journalism for free (unless it’s on your own site or blog), then what you’re doing is making it harder for folks like myself or Dave or Brenna to get money.

    People who write for free on (commercial) games sites devalue games journalism… discuss.

    #46 3 years ago
  47. stalepie

    I don’t think it’s possible to give an unpopular opinion on a game without being seen as a troll or someone vying for attention. You can best do it in retrospect by addressing games you feel were “overlooked,” but if you are a professional critic and you give a 9/10 to a game most gave 6/10 or less, or the opposite, then you’ll just be seen as someone who wants to be special.

    It was different in years past because there wasn’t the Internet, or other ways of aggregating opinion so obviously. People generally were ignorant of one professional opinion to the next — across newspapers and magazines.

    #47 3 years ago
  48. DSB

    @46 You’re never going to be rid of that in the blog era though. All you can do is make sure you get yours, before you sign on anywhere.

    Anyone can make a wordpress website and do what you do, the difference has to be in how well you do it, and who’s actually worth the money.

    I’d certainly welcome some form of guild, allowing freelance writers to collectively bargain, but there’s no chance of that happening internationally, and there’s often little interest locally as well.

    Some countries have unions pushing in this sort of thing, but often they’re for people with a formal education, which is usually in short supply among freelancers.

    If you’re good, you’ll come out on top.

    #48 3 years ago
  49. Dave Cook

    @48 absolutely, if you’re good you will rise above the ‘free’ crowd. But it does make employers believe that people will do this job for nothing, and so they pay next to nothing.

    Vicious cycle and all that

    #49 3 years ago
  50. PsiMonk

    @48 I have no problem with blogging for yourself or a friend’s site for free. But if you’re writing content for free for someone else’s site that runs advertising and is aiming to become, or is, a commercial entity… that’s exploitation.

    But yes, determination, skill, luck will eventually see good writers become good, paid writers. But, as with other areas of journalism, the increasing bar to entry to paid work you can actually live off means we’re getting a narrowing of voices – if you’re poor, or come from a poor background, it means you’re less likely to be able or willing to write for free for ages, or accept less than a living wage for ages, to “make it”.

    And all this still means we’re an industry with too few older writers (they move on to better paid areas), we struggle to retain talent and we undervalue the collective “art” of games journalism – so it’s little wonder that despite the monetary value of the games industry, games and games writers are still treated atrociously by mainstream media.

    Is it any wonder that Ebert can get away with thinking games aren’t art, if we have no one we can push forward as being the games equivalent of Ebert, or Jonathan Ross etc.? Yes, mainstream media acceptance is partly a generational thing about editors’ ages. But partly it’s also that when the mainstream calls games geeky, as games journalists, we mostly just kinda huddle in the corner and take it.

    #50 3 years ago
  51. DSB

    @49 Yeah, but then you can also start talking about the guys who sign with the lowballers.

    That’s the problem with a press corps made up mostly of enthusiasts. There aren’t a lot of ground rules. It’s every man for himself.

    @50 I couldn’t agree more. I’ve turned down games writing for the same reason.

    I just don’t really see a solution, though?

    #51 3 years ago
  52. Ireland Michael

    I remember where one publisher who was more than willing to keep sending us review copies despite us slamming most of their games. I felt kinda bad for that. =(

    Another… completely shut us when we gave one of their games a 2, even though they were a big developer and it was widely accepted that this game was just a lazy cash-in. All their other games we had reviewed incredibly positively.

    Sometimes you need to bite the hand that feeds you. The problem wi the gaming industry is that the hand is practically supplying you every meal.

    @46 He writes on my site, which is entirely voluntary. A lot of our staff are already professional journalists and webmasters elsewhere, but we use it as a platform provide honest and generally professional content (especially in the area of reviews) without any PR manipulation or people looking over our shoulders.

    I’d love to see bitsnark go onto something bigger, because the guy has some of the greatest passion for writing I’ve seen in any journalist in years. He definitely deserves to reap the rewards.

    #52 3 years ago
  53. Dave Cook

    @51 that’s just it man, there’s no real catch-all solution to the issue.

    #53 3 years ago
  54. Dave Cook

    @52 ‘I remember where one publisher who was more than willing to keep sending us review copies despite us slamming most of their games. I felt kinda bad for that. =(‘

    I feel bad when that happens too, but I have to be critical or else I’m not doing my job right. One of the harsh truths of the job.

    #54 3 years ago
  55. Patashnik

    One ‘solution’ – albeit not a very popular one – is to only review games after they’ve been released – and that you’ve actually paid for.

    Which is why my most trusted resource for opinion (outside previews) is forums – where I can read the opinions of people who are playing and, critically, paying for their games…

    #55 3 years ago
  56. PsiMonk

    @55 forum reviews (and other “free” reviews) are great for fans of the series or genre. But the issue with non-writers writing reviews is largely that a reviewer (at least a good one) tries to deliver a snapshot of the experience of the game that’s as impartial as possible – and that’s usually the polar opposite of a forum review.
    So, professional reviews done well i) don’t carry baggage from one game in the series to the next, ii) carry baggage from rival series, iii) assume that one mode or element of the game takes primacy over another, iv) assume the reader has loads of prior knowledge or understanding of the series, game mechanics, genre etc. And all while, ideally, demonstrating understanding of the game, its genre, the series, the historical and broader context.
    In other words, for a lot of people, reading a review of a FF game or a CoD game or a whatever by fans of that game is nigh-on useless at telling them what experience they’ll get. It can be, very useful, if you’re already a fan of the series, of course.
    A good example was Keza Macdonald’s review of Demon’s Souls – that enticed readers in to actually play a game that they might otherwise have passed over. It clearly marks out the good and bad, but also draws the reader in to a new world. I just don’t see that on many forums. But perhaps that’s the forums I hang out on!

    #56 3 years ago
  57. DSB

    @56 I’m not sure I could disagree more with that.

    Arguably the best position a critic could find himself in, is filling the role of the trusted friend. That neccesarily means calling it as you see it, even if it means losing someone, or maybe not living up to anothers standards. If you think the previous entry is relevant to this one, go with it. If you think a game is relevant to an entirely different game, go with it.

    You should use whatever you can if it makes your point easier to understand. Clear communication is the essence of good reporting in my opinion.

    You can only critisize as the person you are, with the references and preferences you have, not the person you think people want you to be, or even the person you aspire to be.

    I think one thing everybody needs to accept for themselves, before they take on something like criticism, is this: You’re not ever going to reach everyone. Trying to do that won’t help you.

    If you have 10,000 readers, then chances are that maybe 3000 are going to agree with you. The rest are going to be split between the people who want to bitch at you, and the people who respectfully disagree. Likewise, some people will catch the reference, others won’t.

    That’s essentially why someone like Nathan Grayson was so good when he was on this site. He actually called it the way he saw it, and he didn’t see any reason to play the “professional”, which meant that his points came through unusually loud and clear. And that’s precisely what makes me trust one writer over another.

    #57 3 years ago
  58. PsiMonk

    @57 – hah, I largely agree with you.

    Of course you have to call it as you see it. And of course you should “use whatever you can” to make yourself “easier to understand”. That’s the point of trying to reach as broad an audience as you can. Sure, you won’t get everyone – but the job of a professional critic is to get as many as we can. To be as passionate, opinionated, divisive, interesting, but also fair, balanced and clear as possible. And there’s a great difference between professional-seeming writing and great professional writing. Great writing, for money, doesn’t have to be bland. In fact it never should be. But…

    Any of my mates can tell me whether I should go and see Prometheus or not. Most in words of one syllable. Most in one word. They don’t need to give me the full picture. They don’t need to tell me what it’s about. In the same way, fan writing doesn’t need to paint a picture of the world – it just needs to tell me if the multi-player is any cop, or if the level design has been sorted out this time.

    Ultimately great, professional critics are guides not friends. They show you worlds you didn’t even know existed, they make places you think you might not like interesting, and they find links between stuff you know and new stuff you don’t. When I’m mountain biking, it’s great to go with mates. But sometimes, if I’m going somewhere new and gnarly, I’d like a professional opinion – based on experience and their ability to size me up. I don’t need a mate telling me “it’ll be fine”, I’d like a guide saying “take it careful on the first right”.

    There is, IMHO, a clear but fine line between matey writing and fan writing, between a guide and a friend, between what should be the best of professional criticism and the best of forum reviews. And the two should be different from each other – not much at times, but always a bit.

    #58 3 years ago
  59. DSB

    Yeah, everybody has a different methodology.

    “the job of a professional critic is to get as many as we can”

    I only agree with that in the most literal sense.

    Ultimately it’s not your job to get readers, that’s the owner of the publication’s problem. Your job is to write some quality reviews and articles, and the editors job is to make sure that you do. The story is the important bit, not the reader.

    Some may be the “critics critic” writing stuff that loses the layman, and some may be the harmless middleground, where everybody can kinda nod their heads.

    To me a creative work isn’t a set of parameters. I came into writing after leaving music as a profession, and all I ever learned from dealing with it technically, was that it was never about technique at all.

    Any cow can learn how to sing as well as Mariah Carey or Whitney Houston, but it’s far from any cow that’s born with a voice like Nina Simone, or the set of balls it takes to use it right. To put it in provocative terms.

    I’m kinda reminded of this Penny Arcade stump:

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/2009/02/06

    That’s pretty representative of my own views. Intuition, the grasp of a subject, beyond simply technique or knowledge or achievement, is something that you can’t teach people. It’s unique to every person, and that’s your real advantage.

    I can’t guide you through a piece of music, anymore than I can guide you through a game. There are too many things going on at once. All I can do is distill that into a piece of text, describing exactly what an album or a game does for me.

    That’s my method. It’s not the only one, but that was really the only point I was trying to make. There are millions of words to use, and there are millions of people, with millions of ideas for rules on how to use them.

    I definitely think I’ve become a better writer for studying the basic journalistic ethics and methods, but I’ll never be a guide, I’ll just be the guy who’s there, telling a story of what I see.

    #59 3 years ago
  60. Gheritt White

    Wow, lots of opinions from journalists here, makes for interesting reading.

    Firstly, THIS IS WHAT NEOGAF IS FOR. This happens every single day there, albeit indirectly and discretely. You just need to keep an eye out for it. This isn’t a bad thing, it’s actually an very agile way of responding to feedback and incorporating key learnings.

    Secondly, Dave – I really like your content on VG247, I think it’s great and if/when we meet IRL, I’d like to buy you a beer. That said, I remember reading your GamesTM review of Mortal Kombat and I have to say it was pretty poor. Granted it’s your own personal opinion and, IIRC, your point that all the characters animated at the same speed is valid. That said, the breadth of content offered on the disc and the depth of the core combat mechanics more than made up for it. Okay, so you could spam certain attacks, but that’s true for virtually all one-on-one fighters. Personally, I reckon it’s a zillion times better than Marvel vs Capcom 3, which is attested to by most of your peers, however GamesTM scored that 8/10 and MK9 got 6/10. Maybe you didn’t score that game, but IMHO you ought to have been aware of the rest of GamesTM’s reviews so as to put your own in context. I genuinely think you were in error, but that’s just IMHO and it’s not like this is personal in any way. Please don’t take this the wrong way!

    Which brings me to my next point.

    EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO THEIR OPINION, BUT…

    …and I appreciate that Jim Sterling and Pat get this already, however…

    …METACRITIC SCORES AFFECT WAGES. When a games gets a rogue 4/10 when all the other review scores are an 8 or a 9, bringing the Metascore below a publisher-defined reward threshold, real living-&-breathing people lose out. They’ve slogged their guts out making a game for two or three years on not very great pay and all of a sudden their big reward is snatched from them by some random cunt with a blog and an opinion. How the hell is that fair? Yes, you could lay the blame at Metacritic for allowing shonky sites on their system (and that really is a big problem), but I honestly don’t know how people like that can sleep at night. Both the journos and the publishers that tie bonuses to Metascores instead of sales.

    (As an aside, what really fucks me off is when people get called “lazy developers”. Honestly, the hours that devs put into this industry, frequently uncredited and often both underpaid and undervalued… breaks my heart, and I mean that. You think writing to multiple deadlines is hard? Try working as a line programmer on a AAA game.)

    Is it somebody’s responsibility as a journalist to recognise this fact and have it affect their review? Absolutely not. Is it what I’d expect from any decent human being, let alone a passionate gamer? Fuck *yeah* it is!

    If a game is genuinely shit, fair enough. But too often I’ve seen small or no-name sites give a game an anomalous low review score – presumably to draw attention and attract hits – leading to a bunch of hard-working devs missing out on the bonus that would have made the previous nine months of crunch worthwhile.

    As for the scores – can we please move to five start ratings already? I saw a site give a 3 and half star review the other day. What the fuck is the point of that?!?! That’s a ten point scale!! Marking out of five – just like the movies – makes sense. Everybody would buy a 3/5 star game – 60%? Notsomuch.

    As for this whole five being an average thing – FFS wake up, it hasn’t been like that since 1993. Recognise the reality of the situation instead of living in some fantasy best-case-scenario dreamland. We all know that 7 is average… well it was until 2009, now 8 is average and all of a sudden a 7 means your project’s sequel gets canned. This is unfortunately the result of their being (a) too many games competing in the same space and (b) too many whiny entitled gamers on the internet. Myself included, I’m no exception.

    Shatner was being a dick when he said journos wren’t “a part” of the industry, but I’ll tell you something… Just like PRs, there are some journos who *are* industry and others who definitely are not. This is usually the point where I’d say “fuck PR!”, but I’ve met some great PRs recently and it’s made me readjust my attitudes. That said, if I had to deal with a videogames PR who had more of an interest in shoes and clubbing in Ibiza than gaming – one who, for example, didn’t even know how to plug in a console, let alone demo the game they’re meant to be promoting – I’d probably want to hand out a shitty score just because of the bad experience and I’d probably feel justified too.

    Back on topic – if a reviewer can potentially affect a games sales and or dev earnings by a rogue, out-of-whack score, then not only do I think devs and PRs have the right to reply, I think Metacritic should take its responsibilities far more seriously and remove them from the site.

    #60 3 years ago
  61. absolutezero

    I think you might be the first person I’ve ever seen that thinks Mortal Kombat is a better fighting game than Marvel 3.

    That completely boggles my mind.

    #61 3 years ago
  62. Gheritt White

    Check Metacritic or GameRankings, I’m clearly not the only one.

    #62 3 years ago
  63. OlderGamer

    Great Post Gheritt White. Really I mean it. Nice.

    @AbsoluteZ

    I also think the MK games are at least as good as Marvel. The reason isn’t gameplay for me. Almost all fighters boil down to button mashers, I think that is a given. But the reason is value. the sheer number of unlockables in some of the MK games were killer. But I can’t really speak for the latest releases from either franchise. I own both, but the DLC crap muddels it for me.

    #63 3 years ago
  64. Ireland Michael

    @64 The recent Mortal Kombat had some downloadable characters after launch and a few classic costumes to buy, but as far as sheer content goes, the game was absolutely bursting at the seams with it.

    The same certainly couldn’t be said for Capcom’s effort…

    #64 3 years ago
  65. DSB

    No journalist has ever taken a penny from a developer. Blaming a reviewer for a practice that he has nothing to do with, is just ridiculous.

    If game developers were somehow slaves who had no choice in what they did, who they worked for, or under what conditions, then maybe I could see your point. I wouldn’t like to cause a slave to get whipped.

    They aren’t though.

    You’re talking about well paid, well educated people, who chose to work for cunts. That’s their problem, not the reviewers, and working for cunts can’t possibly mean that you should get preferential treatment.

    Metacritics problem has nothing to do with the sites they allow, but with the model they use. If a site uses a 1-5 scale then that inexplicably gets converted into Metacritics own 1-100 scale, which means that a 2 somehow becomes a 40, and a 1 somehow becomes a 20.

    It boggles the mind that the industry, the audience, and most of all Metacritic don’t see a pretty obvious problem with that. It’s patently idiotic, and misrepresentative by design.

    Calling for a press where reviewers get boycotted the moment they dare to disagree is just fucking ridiculous, and even though I respect you Gheritt, I think it’s that sort of backwards logic that keeps games from being respected as a whole.

    It’s simple: Look at movies. Most movie critics disagree with eachother. The same thing goes for music. There is no consensus, and people are proud of that. Somehow games is the only place where critics acting and thinking independently, somehow becomes a huge disservice to their audience. No one seems to care about the merit of a review, only about how well it matches their own opinion.

    And movies also have a great aggregate in Rotten Tomatoes, which simply tallies reviews according to whether they’re positive or negative. That way each reviewer only gets one vote to add to the hat, regardless of score, and no one is ever able to cause a massive swing one way or the other.

    Once a movie gets 60% positive reviews, it’s considered “Fresh”. Which also means that if you want to tamper with the score, then you’ll need to buy a lot more than one journalist.

    #65 3 years ago
  66. absolutezero

    “Almost all fighters boil down to button mashers, I think that is a given.”

    Abuh guh?

    What? Theres a reason that Marvel was the main event at Evo this year and Mortal Kombat was a side-line event, its like claiming Starcraft 2 is a lesser game because Company of Heroes has more content.

    #66 3 years ago
  67. OlderGamer

    I stand by that one AZ, sorry. Means nothing tho, just my two cents. But I have seen skilled vets get their asses kicked by some noob pounding buttons.

    #67 3 years ago
  68. Gheritt White

    @ 65: I get your point (…apart from the buit about respectngme, that’s just crazy talk).

    “You’re talking about well paid, well educated people, who chose to work for cunts. That’s their problem, not the reviewers, and working for cunts can’t possibly mean that you should get preferential treatment.”

    That’s a gross oversimplification, especially as these practices aren’t the exception, they’re the norm. Yeah, somebody could leave, but where would they go to that’s any different whatsoever? It’s the standard rule. Devs don’t get paid all that well (unless you’re super-senior) in comparison to other sectors of the market (your passion is frequently leveraged as a means of enforcing unpaid overtime) – you’re big bonus is the carrot. How this went from being measured against sales to being measured against a Metascore is beyond me, but that’s where we are for all sectors of the market aside from iOS/Android devs and indies. Won’t be long until Apple user reviews are employed in the same way, mark my words. It’s a travesty, but it’s too, late to turn the clock back. So, you have to respect the fact that if you want to work in console dev, you will be subjected to this, no exception.

    I agree the Metascore model is flawed and broken and Rotten Tomatoes is *much* better, But now the publishers have a taste for it, if it wasn’t Matacritic it’d just be GameRankings… or even GameStats (p’too, ick).

    Calling for a press where reviewers get boycotted the moment they dare to disagree is just fucking ridiculous, I think it’s that sort of backwards logic that keeps games from being respected as a whole.

    I agree with you – I hate the way certain games like Halo and GTA just get nines and tens by rote, fuck that noise. But you *know* what I’;m talking about – smaller sites using lo scores on big games to make a name for themselves. I understand the reasoning, but much like a software pirate they’re unaware how their action affect people’s livelihood in very real ways.

    While journalism is a noble profession, I don’t think games journalists can be oblivious to the all-too-tangible ramifications of their actions just because, in an ideal world, this set of circumstances would never ever occur.

    #68 3 years ago
  69. DSB

    @68 When I’m in the US, I’m staying in the South. I see people working up to three jobs, none of which they enjoy, some join the army just to survive, some are working just to go to college, which still doesn’t save them from running up a massive debt, which is so incredibly far from anything I see back home in safe, comfortable Denmark.

    I simply cannot take it seriously when people with perfectly good jobs stomp their feet for losing a bonus, even if I can see how it sucks not to get it.

    Ultimately, it’s in their court. If they’re underpaid, they need to do something about it. They can’t just pass the buck to someone who isn’t even a direct part of the industry. Do something about it.

    As for critics, it’s just something I see thrown around a lot whenever someone sticks out, even a little bit. It’s like in the Penny Arcade piece I linked earlier.

    People aren’t looking at merit, they’re looking at how much they agree with something. Gaming is the one scene where everybody agrees. To me having someone disagree would be a sign of progress. And if they’re a contrarian, then it hardly matters, because they’re well and truly alone in that.

    Most reviewers happily slap an 8 onto something they’ve forgotten about next week. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry when I see one of those guys go “This is one game I’m actually going to keep playing after this review”. Most of them have zero credibility. It’s just god-awful.

    #69 3 years ago
  70. Gheritt White

    Okay, I get your point that devs aren’t destitute, but they’re highly skilled labourers – I assume you know about crunch and the ins and outs of dev cycles. EA wives is very much alive and kicking in 2012, i’m sorry to say. A contact of mine recently said that he thought agile and scrum has been effected just as a means of extracting ever more unpaid overtime from devs – that all these managerial drives only increase efficiency at the cost of a workers work/life balance. I <3 agile, but I'm sorry to say he might have a point.

    What I'm trying to say is this – have a heart, FFS. We all know that being a journo is a tough gig even when you're at the top (…Rupert Loman aside, j/k). It's certainly no less tough being in dev, so as I said, have a heart. Remember that your critical analysis doesn't exist in a vacuum or a purely philosophical realm – *you* (as in journalists) have the power to fuck up somebody's career… and I don't mean the design/art/programming leads, I mean the grunts on the shop floor working for a break.

    As for reviews, they need to split into two types – critiques and buyers guides. Critiques should be long-form and have no score. Buyer's guides should be short (say 800 words) and be marked out of five stars. Equally, Metacritic and GameRankings should readjust to the Rotten Tomatoes formula. These two actions would have an enormous positive impact in people's lives. Okay, so we're talking first world people, but it's something that people I've actually met have the power to do.

    Why will this never happen? Because – and here's the kicker – journos need to eat too and those scores and controversial headlines is what puts food on *their* table.

    I've essentially just argued myself into a corner, haven't I? Still, it irks me to see people who can only be described as talentless hacks (I'M LOOKING AT YOU, N'GAI CROAL) make a killing while entire studios suffer because of a rogue score or two.

    #70 3 years ago
  71. DSB

    I get your point though, but I also don’t see how it’s possible.

    You can’t afford to be best buds with people, when you’re covering commercial products. It directly impacts your credibility. I think journalistic integrity becomes twice as important when money is involved.

    If you’re considering wives, kids, tuitions, working conditions when you’re reviewing a game, then it all detracts from what you should be doing, which is relating to the game.

    There just can’t be any mercy (or cruelty) if you want to be a reviewer or a reporter. You can’t add redeeming qualities that don’t come with the disc itself. You should always be fair though, and you should always remember that you’re dealing with peoples hard work. It’s the least you can do.

    Objective journalism is an ideal, not a reality. I’ve reported on people I’ve really, really liked, but I’ve never reviewed them, and I can’t say I would bury or even angle a story a certain way for their sake. Ultimately you back the story, not the person.

    #71 3 years ago

Comments are now closed on this article.

  • Activision Blizzard makes Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For list

    For the first time, Activision Blizzard has been named to Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For list for 2015. The survey conducted by Fortune found the company “ranked highly with its employees” which felt the atmosphere was friendly and place in which they could “be themselves.” “We have always considered Activision Blizzard to be […]

  • Evolve Hunt for Gold Weekend nets players special monster skin

    A Evolve community event is taking place this weekend, and participants will receive a special skin for Goliath, Kraken, and Wraith. Dubbed the Evolve Hunt for Gold Weekend, it’s the first in a series of upcoming online community challenges and events taking place over the coming months. Those who log-in starting today at 9pm PST […]

  • This video teases contents of Resident Evil: Revelations 2 – Episode 3

    A teaser video and images for Resident Evil: Revelations 2 – Episode 3 have been posted by Capcom. The assets can be considered potential spoilers, so just be aware of that before having a look. The game’s Season Pass costs $20, and the disc version releases March 17 in North America and on March 20 […]

  • GTA Online Heists teaser video is extremely short

    With Heists coming to GTA Online next week, Rockstar has released one of the shortest teaser videos we’ve seen in ages. Hopefully you didn’t blink. Heists, along with Daily Objectives and Adversary Mode, arrive next week on March 10. The PC version of Heists will arrive on April 14 when the PC version of the […]

  • The Division rumors claim Dark Zones support up to 100 players – video

    With the recent leak of older, pre-alpha footage of the The Division, rumors over the game’s contents have been swirling, and today we have a video for you discussing said rumors. Once of the rumors pertain to the game is that it contains 50-100 Player Dark Zones, which are PvP areas. Supposedly, these areas also […]

  • Here’s a look at MGS5: The Phantom Pain emblem creation, limited edition bionic arm

    A look at how to create your own emblems in Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain was demonstrated in the latest Kojima Station broadcast, along with a look at the bionic arm replica included in the limited edition. A Venom Snake emblem will come with the limited edition version of the game, parts of […]

  • Elite: Dangerous coming to PS4 once Xbox One exclusivity period ends

    Elite: Dangerous was announced for Xbox One at GDC 2015 yesterday, and those disappointed over the lack of a PlayStation 4 announcement will be pleased to know it’s in the cards. According to Frontier boss David Braben the space-sim will head to PS4 at some point, once the console exclusivity deal with Microsoft has expired. […]

  • Here’s two new The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt screenshots to salivate over

    Two new screenshots from The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt have been released, and they are gorgeous as always. The screenshots follow the two released over the weekend. You can look at the new images in full HD glory over on Only Single Player. CD Projekt Red is at PAX East this weekend showing off the latest […]

  • Microsoft looking into streaming PC games to Xbox One

    With Windows 10, Xbox One users will soon be able to stream their games to PC. Microsoft is also looking into streaming PC games to Xbox One, according to news out of GDC. Speaking with Polygon at GDC 2015, Xbox program director Mike Ybarra said the company is also looking into the ability to stream […]

  • Free! Vindictus Lann Revamp codes worth €25

    We have 400 Lann Revamp codes worth €25 to giveaway for free to VG247 readers. All you need to do is enter your details in the box below and you’ll be given a code to redeem in game. The codes are for warrior character Lann and offer a 7 day unlimited Inner Armour pass, battle […]

  • US eShop update: Mario vs. Donkey Kong: Tipping Stars, OlliOlli, more

    Nintendo has updated the North American end of the eShop with Mario vs. Donkey Kong: Tipping Stars, OlliOlli and a demo version of Azure Striker GUNVOL. Your full update is below. eShop Mario vs. Donkey Kong: Tipping Stars – Wii U, 3DS – Cross Buy OlliOlli – Wii U, 3DS – Cross-Buy Proun+ – Proun+ […]

  • Rock Band 4 confirmed for Xbox One and PS4: supports old instruments and 2,168 songs

    Harmonix has lifted the lid on the long-rumoured Rock Band 4, stating it will support 2,168 previously released tracks and last-gen instruments on PS4 and Xbox One. The game will be out this year. Harmonix has yet to reveal specific features for the game, but it has been built with a completely new engine. As […]

  • First run of Rodea the Sky Soldier copies on Wii U come with Wii version

    The first print run of Rodea the Sky Soldier on Wii U will come with the Wii version packed in, NIS America has confirmed. The publisher confirmed today in a press release that anyone who buys the first run of the retail version of Rodea the Sky Soldier on Wii U will find the Wii […]

  • Unreal Tournament 4 lets modders sell cosmetic items to players

    Unreal Tournament 4 is a game built with the help of the modding community. So it’s only natural that it will feature a marketplace where all cosmetic items can be sold. Epic Games has confirmed that it will allow modders from the community to sell the cosmetics items they’ve created on the game’s marketplace. The […]

  • D4: Dark Dreams Don’t Die is coming to PC – rumour

    SWERY 65 has shown off D4: Dark Dreams Don’t Die running on PC at GDC this week, teasing that a possible port may be on the way. D4: Dark Dreams Don’t Die is SWERY 65′s latest project. An episodic detective affair, D4 came out on Xbox One last September and utilised Kinect as its main […]

  • Valve’s Lighthouse, VR controllers and more explained

    Valve’s less-talked about prototype VR controllers and its Lighthouse technology have been shown in more detail. When HTC announced Vive, the VR headset it’s working on with Valve, it mentioned “base stations” and ergonomic controllers. Now we know what they meant by that. The controllers are still in prototype phase, and will look better when […]

  • Listen to two professional Counter-Strike players explain why Dust2 is so popular

    Hear what makes iconic Counter-Strike map Dust2 one of the most popular maps in shooter history from two former eSports players. Sal “Volcano” Garozzo and Shawn “FMPONE” Snelling are both retired professional Counter-Strike players who are currently working as designers. At GDC this year, the pair hosted a panel titled “Community Level Design for Competitive […]

  • Core Morpheus hardware locked in, no plans for wireless version

    Sony has finalised the core hardware for its VR headset Project Morpheus, and does not currently plan on releasing a wireless version. SCE Worldwide Studios president Shuhei Yoshida spoke to Gamespot at GDC and confirmed that the core hardware of Morpheus is “pretty much done” but that “lots of tweaks and improvements” are still being […]

  • Watch the full Phil Spencer keynote from GDC 2015

    The full GDC 2015 keynote of Xbox boss Phil Spencer is now available to watch. In case you missed last nights’s Phil Spencer keynote at GDC 2015, the whole thing has been made available to watch on YouTube. The address is titled “The Future of Gaming Across the Microsoft Ecosytem,” and it’s where Spencer announced […]

  • Elite: Dangerous won’t be “dumbed down” for Xbox One

    The Xbox One version of Elite: Dangerous will in fact be the same as the PC one. Elite: Dangerous developer Frontier came out on stage last night at GDC to announce the game making its console debut on Xbox One. Some have feared that the port would not provide the same experience as the PC […]

  • Virtual reality: by gum, it’s really happening

    Virtual reality has exited the realm of peripheral gimmick and turned into something that just might go mainstream. VR has an uphill battle ahead of it. The tech is going to be expensive, and there are a number of problems that need to be solved before it could be considered an inclusive technology (motion sickness, […]

  • Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor takes Game of the Year at GDC Awards 2015

    And the winner is: Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor beat out Alien: Isolation, Bayonetta 2, Destiny, and Hearthstone: Heroes of Warcraft to win Game of the Year at the Game Developer’s Choice Awards 2015. Elsewhere in the awards, Ustwo’s mobile hit Monument Valley was a stand-out favourite, with wins in the Innovation, […]

  • Alien: Isolation was prototyped in third-person – video

    Alien: Isolation is one of the most effectively scary triple-A games in years, but it didn’t start off a perfect creation of pure terror. Creative Assembly prototyped Alien: Isolation in third-person perspective before they nailed down the final approach. The developer revealed this during a GDC 2015 presentation, and it’s a good reminder that games […]

  • Madden 15 added to EA Vault

    Madden 15 is now included in EA’s all-you-can-eat subscriber service. Madden 15 is the ninth game to be added to the EA Vault, a stash of games available on demand for EA Access subscribers. It's still Madden Season for EA Access members – Madden NFL 15 is now in The Vault for all members. Go […]

  • Source Engine 2 doesn’t have hidden costs or royalties – but is Steam exclusive

    Three major engines went free at GDC 2015, and each of them is monetising in a different way. There’s been a heck of a lot of discussion about development tools and the costs associated with them during GDC 2015. First Epic announced that Unreal Engine 4 would be free, bar royalities on successful releases. Then […]

  • Final Fantasy creator hates sequels

    Final Fantasy, a byword in prolific franchises, was created by a man who hates sequel. Final Fantasy games are famous for being reinvented with each core release, and it was not until series creator Hironobu Sakaguchi began to withdraw from the franchise after Final Fantasy 9 that we started seeing regular sequels and spin-offs. Speaking […]

  • Guardian complaints led to the closure of Destiny’s Loot Cave

    Destiny players are to blame for the shuttering of the much loved Loot Cave. Early in Destiny‘s history, many players got hugely excited about the “Loot Cave”. Accessible shortly after starting the game for the first time, this high-volume spawn point allowed players to stand in one place, taking out waves and waves of low-level […]

  • Xbox and PC games boss Phil Harrison to leave Microsoft – rumour

    Microsoft Interactive Entertainment Business VP and EMEA head of games Phil Harrison is rumoured to have thrown in the towel. Microsoft has not issued a statement on Harrison’s alleged departure, despite repeated questioning by press at GDC 2015. Instead, word comes via multiple sources speaking to GamesIndustry at the show. According to the rumours, Harrison […]

  • Metal Gear Online commentated trailer explains stuffed dog – but not invisibility

    Metal Gear Online developer Kojima Productions has provided significantly more insight into how the multiplayer side of The Phantom Pain works. Metal Gear Online is the online multiplayer component of Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain. Konami hasn’t shared a great deal about it yet, but we did see a very cool Metal Gear […]

  • Elite: Dangerous Xbox One trailer shows off space MMO

    If Elite: Dangerous looks this good on Xbox One we have nothing to complain about. Microsoft revealed Elite: Dangerous is coming to Xbox One this year during its GDC presentations today. We don’t know very much about the port, but I suppose we ought to have expected it; Frontier Developments has a very close relationship […]

  • Battletoads to appear in Shovel Knight Xbox One

    A Battletoads remake must be on the horizon. Right? Right?? The Battletoads will appear in the upcoming Xbox One version of Shovel Knight, Yacht Club Games revealed today. The Battletoads drop in for a fight! Shovel Knight is headed to Xbox One and meets up with @RareLtd brawling trio! pic.twitter.com/OCQIuWbH3W — Yacht Club Games (@YachtClubGames) […]

  • The Division pre-alpha footage leaks, Ubisoft says it’s well out of date

    The Division fans finally got a look at Ubisoft’s MMO this week, but the publisher has said the footage is not in any way representative. Pre-alpha footage of the The Division was leaked this week, but has since been thoroughly smacked down by takedown notices. All that remains are a few screenshots and a GIF: […]

  • Microsoft HoloLens designer killed in hit and run accident

    Very sad news out of Redmond this week, as Mike Ey was killed in a tragic accident. Ey, 30, was one of the key project designers on Microsoft’s HoloLens AR headset. He was killed on Saturday morning in a rear-end collision. The driver of the second vehicle fled the scene but was tracked down by […]

  • AMD throws support behind VR with new low-latency anti-nausea tech

    GPU manufacturer AMD has released a new SDK compatible with “a broad set of VR devices”. Called LiquidVR, the tech is designed to “bring better content, comfort, and compatibility to VR applications” including games, simulation, entertainment, education, social media, travel, medicine, real estate and ecommerce, apparently. AMD said maintaining comfort and realism in VR environments […]

  • Danganronpa 3 in the works, but a long way off yet

    A new Danganronpa is happening. Danganronpa 3 is in the very, very early production stages, writer Kodaka Kazutaka has confirmed. Nothing about the project is “set in stone”, Kazutaka told Polygon, so there are no details to share yet; the characters and story may change several times before being finalised. The writer said he’s weighing […]

  • Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare MLG Pro League 2015 schedule announced

    Major League Gaming has announced the full schedule for the 2015 Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare MLG Pro League. The eSpots firm revealed two more seasons of Pro League, a live Relegation tournament for Season Three, and a season ending World Championship with $250,000 up for grabs You can watch all the action on MLG.tv […]

  • Happy Birthday PlayStation 2, you are almost old enough to drive

    Amidst all the GDC 2015 hoopla today, we forgot to wish PlayStation 2 a Happy Birthday. The system turned 15 years old today, going by its March 4, 2000 launch date in Japan. It was released in the west that autumn, and had shipped 100 million units in less than six years post launch. PS2 […]

  • Here’s what the final version of Valve’s Steam Controller looks like

    A look at the updated Steam Controller has surfaced via a hands-on post from Polygon. Valve said what you see in the images below is the final version of the controller. The controller has gone through numerous revisions since it was first revealed, but it seems Valve has decided on two touch pads which work […]

  • The Sims, SimCity developer closed down

    The Sims 4 developer Maxis has been shuttered, EA has confirmed. The Sims, SimCity and the rest of the Sim franchise has traditionally been helmed by Maxis, which had its flagship studio in Emeryville, California. Now EA has confirmed with Kotaku that this studio is being closed. “Today we are consolidating Maxis IP development to […]

  • Gigantic MOBA coming to Windows 10 and Xbox One with cross-play

    Today during GDC 2015, Microsoft announced that the new IP from Motiga called Gigantic will be cross-play enabled. Slated for Windows 10 and Xbox One, the five-on-five third-person battle arena game allows the player to select from an array of heroes with distinctive powers and play styles. Players will then make their way through areas […]

  • Here’s a look at Unreal Tournament DirectX 12 gameplay

    Epic Games is creating Unreal Tournament using Unreal Engine 4 running on DirectX 12, which Microsoft says “sets a new bar for visual fidelity.” DirectX 12 is a single API developers can access across Windows devices, which can result in a 20% improvement in performance over DX11 running on the same machine. The Unreal Tournament […]

  • Wireless adapter for Xbox One controllers out later this year

    Microsoft announced at GDC 2015 today it will that all wireless Xbox gaming accessories will be designed for and supported on both Xbox One consoles and Windows 10 PCs moving forward. Later this year, a wireless adapter will be released, allowing current Xbox controllers and future devices to be used wirelessly on PCs. This will […]

  • Microsoft offers up more details on Spencer’s GDC 2015 talk

    Microsoft has provided more details on Cross-Buy functionality between Windows 10 and Xbox One as well as the Xbox Live SKU and other announcements made during Phil Spencer’s talk today. During the session, the head of Xbox shared “the next step” in the company’s plans for a unified platform across all Windows 10 devices which […]

  • Wasteland 2 is coming to PlayStation 4 this summer

    Wasteland 2 is coming to PlayStation 4 as a Game of the Year Edition. inXile Entertainment announced the news on the PS Blog, noting the edition contains enhancements and improvements. The game has been ported to Unity 5, which was announced over the weekend, providing upgraded visual effects, “improved character models, upgraded environments, and Unity […]

  • Cross-Buy detailed for Windows 10 and Xbox One; Elite: Dangerous coming to Xbox One

    During Xbox boss Phil Spencer’s session at GDC 2015 today, it was announced Elite: Dangerous would release on Xbox One. Spencer also outlined cross-buy functionality across Windows 10 and Xbox One. Spencer’s talk started off with Frontier Developments announcing Elite: Dangerous for release this summer as a console debut on Xbox One, suggesting the Elite: […]

  • Longbeards Culture Pack available now for Total War: Attila

    The Longbeards Culture Pack is now available for Total War: Attila and it comes with three new playable factions. The Langobards, the Burgundians and the Alamans can be played in both single and multiplayer campaign modes as well as custom and multiplayer battles. A new feature called The Lay of Ybor is also included. It […]

  • Nvidia unveils Titan X as world’s “most advanced GPU” – video

    Nvidia revealed Titan X as “the world’s most advanced GPU” during Epic founder Tim Sweeney’s State of Unreal session a t GDC 2015 today. Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang took the stage during the panel stating it contains “8 billion transistors,” and has 12GB of RAM. Pricing wasn’t announced, but it was rumored back in January […]

  • Steam sale discounts titles announced for SteamOS

    With many of the year’s most popular games heading to SteamOS, Valve has decided to host sale in celebration. Here’s a short list of titles on sale. The full list of PC, Linux, Mac and SteamOS discounts can be found through the link. The Banner Saga Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor Batman: Arkham […]

  • PayDay 2 announced for SteamOS, celebrating with franchise sale

    PayDay 2 is coming to SteamOS, Overkill has announced. Still under development, a release date will be announced at a later date. “Making sure PAYDAY 2 is available on SteamOS felt like a no-brainer,” said Bo Andersson Klint, CEO of Starbreeze in the press release. “With PAYDAY 2: Crimewave Edition coming to the next generation […]

  • Magicka 2 has a release date and a crazy new trailer

    Magicka 2 has a release date for PC and the PlayStation 4, and Paradox Interactive has released a trailer featuring “Vlad’s latest lyrical triumph,” which is his rendition of the Game of Thrones theme. Magicka arrived on PC and PS4 May 26 and the game can be pre-ordered on PC beginning today, with PS4 pre-orders […]

  • Nintendo eShop schedule: Don’t Starve: Giant Edition, Never Alone, others

    Nintendo has sent over a list of titles heading to the eShop in 2015. The schedule contains titles such as Affordable Space Adventures, Runbow, Swords & Soldiers 2, Don’t Starve: Giant Edition, Never Alone and Mario vs. Donkey Kong: Tipping Stars. Below a preliminary list of games scheduled to launch in the Nintendo eShop on […]

  • Week 8: Can you win the weekly VG247 GTA Online playlist? Play tonight at 8pm UK time!

    We’re hotdogging tonight. I don’t even know what that means. Eight weeks of ridiculous death. Such a brave, true milestone. We’re going to celebrate two entire months of playing weekly GTA Online playlists with VG247 readers with Hotdogging, a set of six jobs I named completely at random. This one ends with a straight-up border […]

  • Puzzle platformer Four Sided Fantasy coming to PC, consoles in early 2016

    Curve Digital and developer Logan Fieth’s studio Ludo Land are bringing puzzle platformer, Four Sided Fantasy, to PC all major consoles in early 2016. Ludo Land are developing the PC version, with Curve Digital handling the console and Vita versions. Four Sided Fantasy tasks players with venturing across “dreamlike levels” by controlling and manipulating the […]

  • Tropico 5 arrives on PS4 in April – video

    A release date for Tropico 5 on PlayStation 4 has been announced. This is the franchise’s first foray onto PlayStation consoles. It arrived in Europe on April 24 and in North America on April 28. A Limited Edition has also been announced, and it includes The Big Cheese DLC and the Bayo Del Olfato sandbox […]

  • Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain Limited Edition PS4 releasing in Asia

    A limited edition Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain PlayStation 4 system will be released in Asia. The system and its DualShock controller were designed in collaboration with Konami Digital Entertainment and targeted for the Asia region, per Gematsu. It will be released as part of PS4 Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain […]

  • This video shows Sid Meier’s Starships being played on iPad

    Sid Meier’s Starships will be released on iPad alongside Mac and PC, and to give you an idea on how it plays on the tablet, a new video has been released. Watch below as Pete Murray and lead producer Stuart Zissu show off the iPad version. The 4X space-strategy releases on March 12.

  • Wolfenstein: The Old Blood announced as standalone prequel to Wolfenstein: The New Order

    Wolfenstein: The Old Blood, a standalone prequel to The New Order, will release May 5 on PC, PS4 and Xbox One. The game takes pace in 1946, and and players take on the role of B.J. Blazkowicz as he embarks on a two-part mission in Bavaria. Part one, Rudi Jäger and the Den of Wolves, […]

  • Observer Mode coming soon to Evolve as a free update

    Observer Mode will be released for Evolve as a free update for all platforms, 2K and Turtle Rock have announced. The community feature was designed to give Evolve players the ability to observe and add commentary as well as livestream, allowing a sixth user to “passively enter a custom game” with the ability to switch […]

  • Dragon Quest Heroes and PS4 top Media Create charts in Japan

    The PlayStation 3 and PS4 skus for Dragon Quest Heroes were the top sellers on the Media Create charts in Japan, moving a combined 594,749 units. Elsewhere on the chart, The Legend of Zelda: Majora’s Mask 3D was in third place with 39,751 units moved, and last week’s top seller, God Eater 2: Rage Burst, […]

  • Watch Hideo Kojima answer lots of your burning Phantom Pain questions

    What’s better than learning the official release date of MGS5: The Phantom pain? Hideo Kojima talking more about it, of course! Hideo Kojima has decided to answer a few fan questions about Metal Gear Solid 5: The Phantom Pain, to help boost everyone’s hype to insane levels. He talks about the game’s story, his relief […]