Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 reviews begin, all the scores here

Tuesday, 19th March 2013 10:05 GMT By Dave Cook

Sniper: Ghost Warrior 2 may have launched last week but reviews are only just appearing now. Does this mean the game is awful, or did review code simply get held up? See for yourself in our score round-up.

For a frame of reference you can watch our very own Sam Clay play through the first 20 minutes of the game here.

Now then, those scores:

OXM – 6/10
CVG – 6/10
Meristation – 4.5/10
Metro – 3/10
Hardcore Gamer – 2.5/5

Got a score we’ve missed? Chuck it below and we’ll add it when we can.



  1. bitsnark

    Oh look, game-that-had-withheld-review-code-in-shit-score-shocker.

    I fully expect a similar fate to befall The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct too.

    #1 2 years ago
  2. pennyman

    well if IGN reviews it – the game will get a 9.1 or higher ‘eh?

    #2 2 years ago
  3. The_Red

    Depends on the exclusivity though I doubt IGN gets another exclusive review and picture with creative lead so soon after BioShock Infinite.

    #3 2 years ago
  4. PrideDK (danish) – 6,0/10

    #4 2 years ago
  5. mreko3230

    I would be very curious to know if some of these scores would be a point or half-point better if the people reviewing would have got a review copy?

    Think about it- its your job to review games and 3 or 4 new games are coming out this week and need to be reviewed and then you get a review copy of a game that should have been worked up and reviewed a week ago. Even if the reviewers dont intentionally ding the scores because of it, I think it almost has to have some effect on the psyche of the person doing the write up. And hey, maybe it would be a way to send a “message” to the devs to be sure they send out timely review copies in the future? That’s probably a dick move, but its just a thought.

    #5 2 years ago
  6. Samoan Spider

    Damn, there goes my benefit of the doubt.

    #6 2 years ago
  7. xxJPRACERxx


    #7 2 years ago
  8. LuLshuck

    gets good user scores on metacritic

    #8 2 years ago
  9. Juste

    I played through the Singleplayer yesterday. Short, insultingly easy and uninspired but not a total disaster. A 6/10 is about right.

    #9 2 years ago
  10. upstate2point0

    Den of Geek! – 5.4/10

    #10 2 years ago
  11. DSB

    I can’t think of a game that has looked worse than this since Rogue Warrior.

    6/10 is a blessing.

    #11 2 years ago
  12. upstate2point0

    LuLshuck…I’m pretty sure City Interactive must be paying for reviews. No one in their right mind would rate this game above mediocre.

    #12 2 years ago
  13. bitsnark

    @12 Yep and also anybody who trusts user scores on metacritic needs to have a lobotomy.

    Most of the people who write those things are mentally compromised and/or haven’t played the game in the first place.

    #13 2 years ago
  14. TheBlackHole

    Really, who expected this to be any different. Really, WHO?

    Average developer makes average game.

    #14 2 years ago
  15. Samoan Spider

    @14 *Sheepishly puts hand up*

    Ok so maybe I’m not entirely surprised but I hoped. I really did. Hope is all we have left in our choice of hobby ;)

    #15 2 years ago
  16. Hussar

    This game’s storyline is the worst I’ve seen in the last 10 years… Oh wait, does SGW2 even has a storyline?

    #16 2 years ago
  17. fear gave it a 70 out of 100.

    #17 2 years ago

Comments are now closed on this article.