So i was reading some random stuff from various forums, and as you guys may know i play a lot of SWTOR.
I saw a post linking to a re-review of SWTOR from Eurogamer, and before i link to it, i want to say that in the initial review, when the game came out, they gave it 8/10, as you can see here: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/star-wars-the-old-republic-review
Now, in the re-review they only gave it a 4/10. I have nothing against them giving it a low score in and of itself, i consider reviews to be subjectional, but here we're talking about a re-review. So i'm really curious on how the bantha could they change their mind in a 180 degree angle? I thought that if you think something is good, then you think it is good.
So my question boils down to, were eurogamer paid for the initial review? Are they just writing what they know their readers want to read with this re-review? Or can't they decide what they like and don't like?
The re-review is here: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-11-26-star-wars-the-old-republic-re-review