Who wins?
UE4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD9CPqSKjTU&feature=youtube_gdata_player
CG: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCr7y4SLhck&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Unreal 4 vs CG
(8 posts)-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
Tough call but the fact that they can do that with real time and not prerendered makes it an instant win =-P
Posted 1 year ago # -
Obviously CG, i always had a soft spot for Collegue Girls 8D
Posted 1 year ago # -
I thought the same thing when I saw the demo Giga, it starts off almost identical. I have to say I still prefer the CG of course, and that it's blue vs red.
It is amazing though that we went from this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1m7T5ay_8DI&feature=related to new demo's features.
That real time version of a CG movie like Final fantasy: Spirits within could happen from what Epic, Square-enix, and Lucas arts are showing.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Wow really?
I thought of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_oLzfzrIaI
I think it's UE4 for the lighting, but it's not exactly a fair comparison :P
Posted 1 year ago # -
@Fearmonkey
Lucas arts is using UE3 for Star Wars 1313 and it is on Next gen.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/352406/confirmed-next-gen-star-wars-1313-is-unreal-engine-3/
Not going to get all these fun doodads with that engine compared to UE4
Posted 1 year ago # -
@Phoenix - Wow, thank you for that, I had no idea it was Unreal 3.
I'm not surprised though, Samaritan was UE3 and looked amazing.Posted 1 year ago # -
Samaritan was ran on inefficient variation of UE3 using a super PC but Lucas Arts can get the last push out of the engine. I like the idea of a mature game in the Star Wars universe.
Posted 1 year ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.