@Crysis Yes, and that just makes him a bigger tool. And I'm not just solely judging him on his responses to me. Anyone who sits around making tranny jokes is a goddamn juvenile.
The guy just can't understand that he's not wanting, except by a few other mutual idiots. And O.G., who should know better to be honest.
Maybe it'll be best if you both move to a state of mutual disdain & ignore each other.
*EDIT*
Posted in the wrong area.
I’m with Crysis on this one.
Plus, its one thing to insult each other but lets not bring loved ones into the insults in any context. Talk shit about each other all you want but lets keep moms, dads, children, cousins, etc. out of the attacks. It just makes you as low as the person you are arguing with.
Either way, you both need to ignore each other. Its getting ridiculous from both of you. Not just from you TEA, not just from you Michael. Both of You.
Acknowledge that neither one of you can talk to each other without turning it into a personal quarrel.
Really, we are talking about games here. Games are meant to bring joy and pleasure, not bickering and fighting.
Bah! I’m done.
Always fun to see, that every topic that ends up in a fight between TEA and Michael gets one of these posts like SpiderLAW's :P
@spiderlaw Gladly. When he stops waving his dick around in every single thread he enters.
"... And O.G., who should know better to be honest."
Your not entirely wrong. Sometimes Tea makes it tough.
For real man, sometimes you do need to chill.
But as sipderLaw said, I have seen it coming from both sides.
My trouble is that I like to play peacemaker. Sometimes ya just gotta toss your hands in the air, shrug, and let be what is going to be. Neither one of ya is gonna make nice. Both are going to claim it is the other guys fault.
Nothing anyone of us other folks here can do about it.
OG is right.
Michael, not placing the blame on you man but you claim to be soo000ooo mature and above his level but have yet to display it. If you were as mature as you claim to be, it would be simple enough for you to ignore him. Im not saying TEA is right and you are wrong, you both deserve blame. Im only pointing this out to you because you have claimed to be above the nonsense countless times and have yet to prove it.
But again OG is right. There is nothing anyone of us here can do about it.
Simple as this. TEA relax a bit. Michael chill. TEA, ignore Michaels opinion if you dont like it so much. Michael, ignore whatever TEA says if it bothers you that much. I dont understand whats so damn difficult.
This is my last entry into this for reals though. Its up to you 2 to solve this.
Back to the Topic of exclusives.
I still stand on the fact that 1st part exclusives are important. Most of them are the best experiences. Without First Party exclusives, we wouldnt have Halo, Uncharted, Little Big Planet, Fable, and Killzone and to me those are all outstanding games. Some i like more than others (ranked in this order Uncharted, Killzone, Gears, Halo, Little Big Planet, GT5, Forza, Fable.)
If a 3rd part exclusive can be played on another platform, without being broken, i dont see the purpose of it being exclusive.
O'Connor what are we going to do with you my son. You're just an all around loser bringing 3rd parties like the hiphop gamer in this is so hypocritical of you accusing me of making tranny jokes about your boyfriend. I admit I have no right to bring your personal life into our little squabbles and how you choose to live your life with your mate is non of my business but shouting BLACK COCK in the middle of a comment thread gets people thinking of what you do in your spare time ;)
I would like to point out to the kangaroo kid up there Crysis who keeps trying to play saint please STFU and stop trying to act like you're VG247 mediator. Some people in this world will never see eye to eye and thats all to it. I would like to point out in this article he provoked me starting yesterdays rift-raft .....
as you can see I made a valid comment on the subject @ #5 then O'Connor comes out of no where with no reason other than to troll and spews his ugliness with comment #6. I then simple reply kindly at #7 telling him dude you're not worth my energy STFU and learn better trolling tactics....he then takes the commenting off the main topic and starts to insult me @ #8. A good Samaritan by the name of FredEffinChopin chimes in @ #9 and tells O'Connor you're being a douche bag (as usual) and that regardless of my tone I am right and he agrees. From that point on O'Connor follows me all over the site all day like a lost puppy wanting to be fed off the scraps I throw on the ground.
Oh and I'll respond to his #13 comment on that DC article:...
Hey Jackass it doesn't matter if you installed 10GB of data or not from the disc it has to do with the convenience that I can have NFS:HP in my disc tray and switch back and forth between games on the fly without having to swap out disc. Example...Tekken 5 Dark Resurrection on HDD and then switching over to a disc based game like BFBC2 conveniently and effortlessly. Thats why so many people are pissed plus the fact its an online only game dummy so its more tide down as a PSN title rather than a PS3 disc (play anytime you want offline) title. Can your small drunken brain comprehend that you lucky charm bastard.
So there you have it Crysis aka Mr. Lets all just get along. The guy is just a fool and he has nothing better to do but prance around like he's GODs gift to gaming. The fucker has his own shitty game site (he shares with the rest of his halo reach launch party buddies) and he still finds time to harass and troll other gamers and sites. If he's so mature and the light of the gaming community then how come sooooooooooo many people hate him? He's a pompous napoleonic complex attention spot light seeking "euro" jerk cunt. At least I know I'm hated by the XBOTS but I don't give a damn because they're all losers anyway and I'm not changing my words to please any fucker on this site. If you don't like me or the ideals I share then ignore me ass holes....but we all know in reality what I say is the truth and you either love it or you love to hate me.
NOW BACK ON TOPIC:
Any dick who says Ace Combat was shit is not a gamer. Plain and simple! And don't argue the fact that certain I.P.s haven't lost their allure because they have. A game like FFXIII was ruined by the 360 and had that game stayed PS3 exclusive it wouldn't have turned out ass backwards as it was. Even everyone who reviewed it notice the structured formula of explore and then dungeon crawl was done backwards because of the disc swapping that had to be done on the XBOX 360. Some games just hold a special legacy and attachment to a console. It doesn't feel right playing a Sonic game on a Nintendo console along side Mario....at least not at first back on the gamecube but we all got use to it I guess but tell me that hasn't cursed the Sonic name to this day. Sonic games are shit now they've all lost that nostalgia from the old Sega days where SONIC was a system seller and a top tier game. If Sega released the Dreamcast 2 tomorrow and Sonic 5 was an exclusive launch title and was a must have we'd all rush out and buy that shit in a heart beat.
Some things are just not meant to be changed and could have a devastating negative impact on that franchise if the move is not made right to another console. Tekken 6,FFXIII,and Devil May Cry all suffered and lost their glamor as top tier games because they weren't meant to be played on any other system other than PlayStation. Its a sad time we live in that money is praised higher than good morals. Companies are greedy and thats all they care about. they don't care about the image they are destroying, the good times and memories of the old days, they're all blinded by greed and money. I rather take dignity and respect over money any day but then again I'm just one guy vs a world wide corporation.
So as long as we still have great 1st party exclusives they will always be the fighting tools and importance of a video game console. SONY is the undisputed best 1st party publisher hands down on any "platform" they have the best talented game devs in the industry and have the best hardware to make produce all these amazing genres we all appreciate like LBP,Killzone,Mod Nation Racers,InFamous,Uncharted,Heavy Rain,Motorstorm,Sing Star,GT5,Warhawk,and many more. These games represent why exclusivity is a must and are super important for the better development of the video game industry. They're not about networking tricks they're all about the games,the story,the graphics,the gameplay,the sound,the experience we all grew up wanting and loving with each new iteration of next gen hardware.
SONY IS THE KING OF EXCLUSIVITY and 2011 PROVES THAT. THERES ONLY ONE PLACE TO ENJOY THAT TERM and THATS ON THE PS3.....THE END
"Some things are just not meant to be changed and could have a devastating negative impact on that franchise if the move is not made right to another console. Tekken 6,FFXIII,and Devil May Cry all suffered and lost their glamor as top tier games because they weren't meant to be played on any other system other than PlayStation. Its a sad time we live in that money is praised higher than good morals. Companies are greedy and thats all they care about. they don't care about the image they are destroying, the good times and memories of the old days, they're all blinded by greed and money. I rather take dignity and respect over money any day but then again I'm just one guy vs a world wide corporation."
- Sadly this is the case with all corporations, even ones in charge of public safety. It all comes down to downsizing expenses and expanding profits. Games developing, publishing, producing companies are none different.
TEA, could you do me a favor and list all the PS3 exclusives for this year?
Dmc4 was no worse than the predecessors, it's the third best selling game in the series as well. Final fantasy X was a totally linear crapola, it's their luck it didn't get the same reception as the last one.
Playstation2 has been holding back the first xbox for years, as well as the Gamecube. take the ruined RE4 port for instance, sadly it was all about the money, and devs had to make the games for that piece of shit. we could've had a Dmc looking and running better, yet unfortunately we got the product made for the lowest common denominator.
what Hunam said. oh well.
@DaMan DMC4 was fun, as long as you didn't mind essentially playing through the same levels twice, only with a different character. It's some of the laziest design I've ever seen.
@TEA's rampant bullshit.
"Any dick who says Ace Combat was shit is not a gamer."
Or they prefer to play decent flight simulators, instead of My First Flight Sim, as I like to call the franchise.
I'm not even going to argue FFXIII. The game was bad design all through, and would have been terrible whether it had the freedom to roam about or not, thanks to its god awful story, terrible characters and paper thin gameplay. And *those* are not qualities the choice of format would have had any effect on.
"It doesn't feel right playing a Sonic game on a Nintendo console along side Mario."
That's funny. Sonic Colours is the most fun I've had with a Sonic game in years, and I only ever got a chance to play Sonic Adventure 2 when it appeared on the GameCube. Sonic Rush was also really good.
Again, the quality of the gameplay has absolutely nothing to do with the format. If you're claiming otherwise, you're a fanboy.
"Companies are greedy and thats all they care about. they don't care about the image they are destroying."
They are not destroying any image. Drinking Pepsi doesn't suddenly change the quality of Coke. Watching a DVD instead of a Blu-Ray doesn't stop a great movie from being a great movie.
Playing Tekken on the 360 doesn't mean jack shit to anyone but a fanboy. The game is exactly the same on either format, and it wouldn't have turned out any better or worse if it had remained a PS3 exclusive.
I will repeat this point for you again, in the hope that your pea-headed brain will be able to understand it...
THE ONLY REASON THESE FRANCHISES WERE EVER "EXCLUSIVE" IN THE FIRST PLACE WAS BECAUSE COMPETITION TO THE PS1 AND PS2 WAS NEARLY NON-EXISTENT
They didn't *need* to release most of these games on the N64, Saturn, Dreamcast, Xbox 1 or GameCube because 90% of the the gaming consumer base already had a PS1 or PS2.
This is a *fact*.
Are you actually delusional enough to think that if the market had been more evenly shared... if the same had the same share of the market as the PS1, or the GameCube and Xbox owned an equal piece of the gaming pie as the PS2 did, that companies wouldn't have been porting all their biggest franchise over to those formats as well?
REALLY?!
If you do, you're completely delusional, ignorant, and retarded.
"SONY IS THE KING OF EXCLUSIVITY and 2011 PROVES THAT. THERES ONLY ONE PLACE TO ENJOY THAT TERM and THATS ON THE PS3.....THE END"
I won't disagree with this in the slightest. They are the bes when it comes to securing first party titles. LittleBigPlanet 2 is one of my favourite games of this year, in much the same way the first one was.
You're missing the point (as usual). There are just as many great third party games as there are first party ones, and it ultimately comes down to the games you want to play.
Batman certainly wasn't hurt being his multi platform. Neither was Red Dead Redemption. Or Vanquish. or any other number of titles. The vast majority of these are vastly better than the majority of exclusives that appear on any format.
But *every* format has great exclusives.
The Wii has great exclusives. I can't wait for The Last Story, which is looking phenomenal. I also want to give Epic Mickey and Kirby's Epic Yarn a bash.
The DS has great exclusives. I'm knee deep in Pokemon Black, and I have a back catalogue of great RPGs on the format that I need to sink my time into at some point as well - Dragon Quest IX, Infinite Space, Golden Sun, etc.
The PSP has great exclusives. I'm nearly finished my complete play through of Birth By Sleep, and I'm looking forward to the new Dissidia. I've sunk nearly 100 hours into the original.
The PS3 also has great exclusives. There's no denying that. Heavy Rain, LittleBigPlanet, Demon's Soul, Flower, Heavenly Rain... some of the best gaming experiences I've had.
The 360 may not have as many, but its still had some great ones. I loved Alan Wake, Lost Odyssey is one of the best RPGs I've ever played, and I love the Project Gotham games. I also think Xbox Live's selection of downloadable titles is vastly superior to PSN's.
You *really* want exclusives? Get a PC. That has 30 odd years of exclusives, of games that redefined the industry. Games that never have and never will work on a home console. I don't even know to start.
"I rather take dignity and respect over money any day but then again I'm just one guy vs a world wide corporation."
If your definition of "dignity and respecting" is risking the welfare of your company and other people's jobs for the sake of waving a flag for a certain console, I would seriously suggest re-evaluating your life.
You're a juvenile child, stuck in the playground, who never grew up out of his teenage mentality. You're stuck in the past, and you're an out-dated relic of a gaming template that hasn't be relevant for over half a decade.
Some of that was a good read Mike. (note, i said some...im exluding the attacks lol. Im not very fond of personal quarrels, unless it's my fist in somebody esles face which in L.A., it happens whether you want it to or not, unavoidable....not that i like to fight, cuz i dont, i try my best to avoid it, but i rather my fist hurt them then theirs hurt me....im carrying on too much, i know. I could go on...im on a sugar high at the moment. Just had granola bars and a craprisun for preworkout meal.)
good stuff.
GET TO WORK! YOU PLAY TOO MANY DAMN GAMES,SHIT! LOL i kid.
@TEA, Michael isn't just randomly attacking you, it's how you rate your own opinions as fact no matter how odd they are & you just can't hack it if someone disagrees with you, no matter how logical the response is.
Thank you, Crysis.
dreadful thread
PS2 was king of Consoles, before that Mega Drive/Genisis
@Daytripper, well a certain person came in & decided to start something with another certain person, til then it was a mature conversation.
@crysis yes which makes it a dreadful thread in my opinion, just say who it is, whats he going to do? call you names on the internet? who gives a shit, not having a go at you crysis but i'm sure you understand where i'm coming from mate.
Micheal you had some hit and misses as well as TEA. For micheal the quality of sonic has shot to hell you stated the ports of original exclusives and a exclusive handheld/console version of sonic were great. But, what about those other God awful ones? Like Sonic the hedgehog? You know where sonic looked real as hell. As if they tried to show what it would be like if sonic we're a real boy. Or sonic unleashed? Were-hog? The essence of sonic is to go fast, not be a damn were-hog. Sonic and mario olympics where mario is as fast if not faster then sonic!?
Do you really believe that these games being made multi-platform didn't ruin the greatness in them? Do you think the crashs on the wii were even remotely as good as the ones originated on ps1? Our old favorites are practically ruined when going from one console to many? If mario was to go to sony or microsoft the you'd have to expect to see a mario in fps or in uncharted ways. It would just be awful!(unless naughty dog did it)
It doesn't take a fanboy of a console to recognise their favorite GAME has lost its essence. And, honestly at the cost to make more money. Dmc4 although fun didn't invoke the same replay value that dmc1&3 did when they were exclusives. The problem with multiplatform titles are that they are rushed. They are trying to meet a deadline and the investment into the ips are short. Honestly using anything from capcom is a dud. to me they are the worst devs out here.
Tea I generally weed through your rants and get right to your points. Sometimes reading your rants are hilarious. Other times I don't care. But, in the end if you read between the lines of Tea you can see he's right. When he talks about investing into the market of gaming he always states go future proof. Can anyone in a finacial bind really argue with that? that when you do purchase a device to make sure the company is putting tech out their that'll last. Our gaming life isn't like our cellular phones. Its to cost effective to buy a device over and over year after year.
Other then that I agree with both of your points some more then the other. But at the end of the day just play some DAMN games
Nice read Lex. I agree with you 98% of the way. Capcom isnt the worst developers, they have just recently lost their way when things have shifted greatly from last gen to next. Last gen they were great developers releasing really good games but this gen have lost their way a bit. Im hoping that when the next generation of consoles are released, they will finally find their footing again and start releasing those really good games again.
Onimusha 5 (new, free camera. new combo system. new counter system. Return of Samunosuke and Jubei)
Street Fighter 5 (one release, one ultimate edition with new perry system)
Resident Evil 6 (walk and shoot. Better movement mechanics. Return to Horror. Same great attention to graphical detail.)
DmC2 (Return to Japanese art style while including Western Story Telling)
New Platforming, 3rd Person Shooting/Action RPG I.P. (Think Mario 64 with weapons and much larger scale)
@lex I never said they were all good. I was pointing out that they weren't all bad, as evidence that going multi-format doesn't always ruin the quality of a game. So I fail to see your point.
Format exclusivity means nothing. The bad games would have been bad regardless. Being on the Dreamcast never stop Sonic Adventure 1 from being a god awfully bad game. The second was half decent, at least.
Still has nothing to do with format.
"The problem with multiplatform titles are that they are rushed."
This is utter bullshit. Format has never dictated the speed at which a game is released, and you have absolutely nothing to substantiate such a ridiculously absurd assumption.
Devil May Cry 4 wasn't rushed. It was just lazy. It would have been lazy no matter what format it was on. You say Devil May Cry 1 and 3 were great, but hey, what about Devil May Cry 2? That was only on one format, yet it was still a terrible game.
But you seem to have conveniently left that game out of your argument. Ooooh, I can't imagine why... maybe because it completely kills your argument?
The fact still stands. The only reason these games were on one single format was because the competition was no insignificant that you didn't even have to bother. Why release a game for 20% of the market when the other 80% are guaranteed to buy it?
The problem here is the Wii's inability to accommodate traditional games, as great as the format is. Instead of being able to focus on the biggest common denominator (the PS2 in its day), devs are being forced to create traditionally designed titles across two different format, who only share about half the market between them.
If they only focused on one format, they'd only be able to appeal to about 25% of the gaming consumer base. They'd make almost no money.
And again, format exclusiveness has never ensured quality. Format exclusitivity never succeeded in making God of War a decent game, never guaranteed a decent title in the Resistance franchise, never made Sonic better, has seen plenty of rubbish Mario titles, and there are countless other examples I could add onto that to boot.
Sure, there are great games that are exclusive. Just as many great games as aren't exclusive. And none of them were rushed.
Um if you read dev diaries then that's more then enough to sustain my argument on the quality of rushing titles. The reason I didn't mention dmc2 is because it fell to that standard of rushed product. When capcom released a press note that they were cutting dev time so they can release new titles annually over the 5-6year dev times also proves it. It was also posted on this site, and capcoms release of mvc3, sf4,and ssf4 shows what quality u get from rushed work. Sf4 ran better on 360 but ssf4 released 7mnths later made it more stable in quality between the 2. And now mvc3 is falling victim to the same issues as sf4.
We didn't have these terrible frame issues in exclusive fighters like we do now. They didn't need to do tech analysis on them because there weren't any issues that the other didn't equally suffer from. Also, my point is being brought to the fact that there are multiple consoles out here now. That the quality is shot. For instance, cod4 even trade on xbox and ps3. Pretty much no complaints. Then mw2 released people noticed favor in 360. Then black ops again favor in 360. But if you pay attention each title a year of dev time apart of launch. What does that equate? RUSHED products. And, are they not multi platforms?
The proof doesn't take rocket science to uncover its right there. Every dev falls for this because of the fact 360 is easiest to develop for. So they develop for 360 1year-1yr and a half then port. Back in the day the market was ps1 versus pc if you don't recall.
Also, sonic adventure 1 and 2 were loved by its fans. Maybe not by you but I know tons of people who still clamour about the awesomeness that was sonic adventures.
In the end though at this state of gaming exclusives don't matter to drive systems. Because the biggest system movers now are multi platforms. But, they do help a hell of a lot to tilt favor to console specifics. If you take into account titles like dead space 2 or casltevania you can tell completely where if they were console exclusive they would blow some of our cherished titles out of the water. But, instead their anchor down to try and feed off of both consoles strengths. When I saw the ending cg of LoS I was like this is the worst looking cg I've seen to date. It still did its job of hyping me up for a part 2 but it looked like ps2 graphics with a little polish.
That's an anchor multiplatforms have that exclusives don't suffer from.
Very good Lex but they all know I'm right. Great example of Mario too. The fact of the matter is everyone is trying to pretend they are a good guy on here like internet cred means shit or something. When I made that rant on Blizzard's 2 min thank you for 20 years of making us filthy rich video I know I was speaking for a lot of people who were scared to voice their opinion because they have to look like they don't hate anyone for anything in the industry. If I have to be that tool for everyone to channel their thoughts through so be it.
The main issue I have with legacy exclusives staying on the intended platform they were first given life is that I don't want to see this industry end up like the movie or music biz. Its getting dirty and corrupt and causing separation throughout the community rather than unity. In essence the whole FFXIII thing going to 360 was suppose to be a good thing morally but in reality it wasn't. It caused more grief, more petty arguing and it has almost destroyed the series image of how fun the games were back 20 years ago. I understand from a business point you're trying to make a profit but at the same time you're not going to make a profit if the product sucks and people start to lose faith in the franchise because you decided to be greedy.
Its like trying to make 100 cup cakes with your secret ingredients that make them the best cupcakes in the world but another guy asks you to make him 100 also and you only have a limited of ingredients to ensure your first 100 cupcakes will retain their famous desired flavor but you decide to skimp out and spread your resources making 200 and the products come out bland and average. That's what happened to FFXIII, Tekken 6, Devil May Cry 4, and other legacy exclusives that once belonged to the PlayStation brand.
GTA4 is another prime example. Its no where as memorable as the 3 series. San Andreas to me is even better but why?.....Because GTA4 was spread out and all the right resources weren't focused on one product first and it suffered imo on the fun factor original essence of what GTA was all about. The whole greediness and foul play over sales and exclusive timed content ruined GTA image big time. But like I said coming from a business stand point Take 2 was in financial trouble and they had no choice but to spread themselves and maximize their chances for profit to protect themselves from going under and being bought by E.A. But in the end it really did damage to the GTA series and now its going to bite them in the ass because GTA has been over taken by C.O.D. in terms of crazy day 1 numbers and popularity.
Despite the fall of our many beloved legacy exclusives from last gen we are seeing some cool new ones like Demon Souls, Valkyrie Chronicles, and Gears of War being born this generation. Ultimately though 1st party exclusives will be the most important to consoles because they take advantage of the hardware. Naturally as (console) gamers we love to see that next big graphical and technical leap in titles every year or 2 in that general 1-7 year console cycle of current hardware.
The author of this thread asked one general question that I was of interest of and why I chose to reply to this (obvious flamebait) thread in the first place. He asked about the future of both the XBOX360's and PS3's exclusives and I think its pretty much evident that which ever company has the best 1st party devs they will ultimately have a greater chance of having the best exclusives in the end of this console generation. That's why I'm particularly excited about 2011 and why I'm happier than a teenage girl at a Justin Bieber concert that Epic and M$ has waited an extra year off the regular 2 year release of the Gears series to release Gears 3. That means SONY and M$ will release their best exclusives for their consoles this fall and to me its been a head off battle I've wanted to see ever since the original Uncharted released.
Uncharted 3 vs Gears 3 is undeniably the best test to compare which console has the best exclusives and power of both consoles hands down.
Gears 2 is XBOX 360's best looking title, UC2 is PS3's best looking title. They're both on a technical level very impressive with very good story narratives and voice acting.....this shit is destiny people. To me this will determine who won the console war of this gen. If you believe in the wii then please fuck off and don't waste your time replying to me with that stupid shit. Go compare that last gen gamecube console with motion controls to the PS2 it is. Which ever game gets GOTY out of Gears 3 or Uncharted 3 (from unbiased industry reviewers and the general community) then I believe its time to claim a victor and move onto the next gen of consoles by fall 2012.
lexp oh look, someone has released a rushed game. so let's blame that on multiplatform strategy. cool story, bro.
the fact of the matter is that there're better studios and worse studios.
also most of the times the other port is being developed by a different team. sometimes even outsourced. Splinter Cell for PS2 was made by Ubi Shanghai, while the original was done by their Montreal one. for some reason it was competent for what it was running on. japs have fallen behind since the move from fixed pipelines (they ignored the first xbox anyway). even before that actually, the further they moved from the 90s the more it became evident.
oh, and Michael do you really complain about recycling the stages in Dmc4? it's what you do in it anyway, wasn't Bayonetta meant to be played again and again and it recycled the bosses at the end too. the game also had as much replay value as the predecessors,
Wow Good stuff yet again Lex, you too TEA....this is turning out to be a good thread afterall.
I still stand on Exclusives friggin matter. I love exclusives the most as they are the best experiences had. Not saying you cant find stellar multiplat experiences BUT they usually dont equal to the quality of exclusives with a few exceptions.
there're just as many crap exclusive titles, it's that there're more multiplatform games and thus it seems as if they tend to be of lesser quality.
since there're more developers releasing their projects for more than one platform, it seems that their games tend to be of lesser quality. there will always be more bad looking ones than the other way around.
I say bar a couple of games, all the best experiences this gen are multiplatform.
I have posted this before but i think it just says it all theres no need for the Xbox anymore its outdated unless you want it just to play gears of war which i have but i wasn't to keen on the 2cnd one 3rd looks good though but will be nothing on the PS3 exclusives.
I have an Xbox which i bought my younger brother for christmas, i usedto have an Xbox like 4 years ago when there were no games for PS3 and liked it, but then i found out again why PS is good when i bought the slim couple of years ago.
you cant argue that the graphics are far suprior on the PS3 its just that most games are made for the Xbox and ported to PS3 usualy making sure that the PS3 game is not quite on par or is the same as the Xbox 360 version so as not to piss of micro$oft [bribes alot of the time involved] money talks, big example is COD, was badly ported to PS3 its doesent run aswel but even though it was ported after playing on the PS3 you go to xbox and it looks more soft with less colours and less visually sharp, this is because the Xbox is not true HD it upscales to HD, the ps3 is FULL HD and it shows, the only reason the PS3 version of COD doesnt run as smooth is because it was ported and not coded properly for the PS3 and on purpose too, Micro$oft [Xbox 360] wanted to try and make people think that the PS3 is hard to code for and that it is not as good as the xbox so because they have so much $$$$ they just paid Activision to do what theyre told, like they do for other games. because they no their console is showing its age and because theyve got such a big fan base they dont want people to realize this. remember COD is only an example i liked it for abit but its POO game.
And also remember the only reason Xbox has so many fans and users is because it came out when all we had was the PS2, and i along with milions obviosly went to the xbox, and then when the PS3 came out i along with millions were like yeh thats shit this is what its all about, its only when you actually buy or get a PS3 and play it for abit that you REALLY appreciate how good and suprior it is to the Xbox, also the controls you may think you love the Xbox ones but when you get used to the PS3 controller theyre so much better, analog sticks more smooth and sensative with a slightly wider range more presice, just cradle in your hand, no need to mention the dual shock is superb and a must have for most types of games, once your usedto the rumble it feels depressing playing wihtout it or with little of it.
PS3 exclusives such as UNCHANTED, GRAN TURISMO, GOD OF WAR, MEATA GEAR SOLID and KILLZONE!! really show off how amazingly graphical + smooth the PS3 really is. now play CRYSIS 2 demo on Xbox [again it is ported badly to ps3 so pay the xbox 1] then directly after play KILLZONE 3 on PS3 and you WILL BE AMAZED at how amazing the graphics are and how smooth the game is, even with 24 players online, it does shock you to how good the PS3 really is when its used proply like it should be but none of these multi platform game companies want to showcase that and piss off micro$oft because afterall theyve got the money and as we all no and is proven with games like COD and CRYSIS 2 money talks, its a bummer for people who own the PS3 because it means that most games we basicly haveto play the Xbox 360 version of which is stupid, but hopefully this will start to stop when BATTLEFIELD 3 comes out because they’re making a different version for each platform, they have stated that the ps3 version will be better than the Xbox 360′s.
Just to add dont go on about Xbox Live no more PSN perfectly fine for online play now only thing Xbox live has that PSN has’nt is party chat and apparently something about demo’s but every demo i want to play on the PS3 i can. the PS3 is also better value than the Xbox, how did i work that out you say? you pay £150-£200 for xbox but then youve got to pay for the wirless receiver another £50-£80 and Xbox live an extra £40 per year, so that about £250 for the latest console with built in wirless, and the same really for the lower budget model if you need the wirless receiver which mose people do, ino i do, and you will have like a 4gb or no hard drive. then you have compared to the ps3 a good chance that it may brake and not have a very long life.
the ps3 on the other hand is £250-£300 all in depending on which one you wan’t might aswell go for the 160 gb you dont really need 320, and you get a full HD gaming system, plus added bonuses of being able to surf the internet watch bluray movies and enjoy true stunning HD games, plus the PS3 has proven extremely reliable and should last around 8 years with a very low percentage that it will break, just incase it does i have the warrenty for 5 years which cost only £50 just incase. Ive had 3 Xbox’s 2 were years ago and one new one my brother owns which i can always hear through my ceiling lol, PS3 is a silent assasin.
there we have it its all there and none of it is a lie i could go on but i dont cant be ass’ed lol. you may call me ‘FANBOY’ but the fact is i no exactly what the Xbox is ive had 3 of them like nearly everyone who owns a PS3 usedto play the xbox, and i do love the PS3 because it is……. the best out of the consoles you can get and its a fact, these game developers just need to stop taking $$$$ and stop being so scared by micro$oft and just go ahead and make the game the best it can be for that console. say no more no lies all truth.
You must log in to post.
© videogaming247 Ltd.
