VG247 Forum » Topic: Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?

VG247 Forum » Topic: Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09? http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40 Just another bbPress community en-US Wed, 22 May 2013 18:31:14 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 <![CDATA[Search]]> q http://www.vg247.com/forum/search.php Gheritt White on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=3#post-766 Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:09:54 +0000 Gheritt White 766@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ tl;dr JesteR on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=3#post-748 Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:21:24 +0000 JesteR 748@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Then you must be bored. locus2k1 on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=3#post-747 Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:44:28 +0000 locus2k1 747@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ I read it. JesteR on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-743 Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:41 +0000 JesteR 743@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Giga wtf? You dont expect anyone to read your long post.... G1GAHURTZ on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-716 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:24:13 +0000 G1GAHURTZ 716@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Giga. Johnny Cullen on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-715 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:12:46 +0000 Johnny Cullen 715@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Which chip, Jasper? G1GAHURTZ on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-714 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:08:59 +0000 G1GAHURTZ 714@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ It's ok, I've got a indefinite warranty. I'll be back with a much more aggresive chipset. Johnny Cullen on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-713 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:02:49 +0000 Johnny Cullen 713@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ GIGA's RROD'd, innit? Anonymous on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-712 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:41:35 +0000 Anonymous 712@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ xbotmeltdownlol Johnny Cullen on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-709 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:18:43 +0000 Johnny Cullen 709@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Woah... G1GAHURTZ on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-706 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:57:52 +0000 G1GAHURTZ 706@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ "But you carry on as much as you like, I will not be reading it." Oh really? Then you won't bother replying to what I have written below then. Good. ______________________________________________________________________________ "Oh dear G1GAHURTZ, a dozen paragraphs wasted because you did not read and absorb one of mine." No, not really. You are just trying to slither and squirm your way out of admitting that you said something totally stupid in the first place. "Believe it or not, I understand your explanation that you requested a quote targeted at a single individual" Excellent! So now you've admitted that you were just being stupidly flippant. You are now saying that you knew exactly what I was talking about, but even so, you decided to spew a load of unnecessary pedantry about the finer details of the definition of the word 'specific'. Now THATS what I call a waste of time. Anyway, I'm glad that you've admitted to your clear dishonesty. Well done. Don't do it again. "but if you bothered to read my post properly you would see that despite this, I thought the highly arbitrary and restrictive terms of your request were very convenient for you and consequently did not accept that I should be bound by them (what, do you decide the rules of discourse I must live by?)." More nonsense. If you didn't like the question, then don't answer! Perhaps it would have been better if you'd accepted my initial advice and just shut up! You have clearly said in your own words that you knew what I was talking about. So now you are admitting that you didn't even answer the question that I asked you, even though you clearly said in the post above "You challenged me to find an example and I found one." So now you are simply admitting to an outright LIE! How disgusting. First you say that you've answered my question, and now you admit that you intentionally gave an answer to a question that I didn't even ask! Wow! Is 'winning teh internets' really that important to you that you have to resort to pathetic lies!? "Given that you had complained about a poster calling "everyone" (a group) a fanboy I considered it perfectly reasonable to quote you using the term "all you fanboys" (a group), regardless of what *you* wanted (an individual). Get it now?" Oh, so here we have the most explicit admission of lying. So now you say that regardless of what I asked you, because you didn’t like the question and knew that it was too “restrictive” for you, you just gave a totally irrelevant quote. Again, more proof that "You challenged me to find an example and I found one." was a clear LIE. Add to this the fact that the quote was totally taken out of context (we have already established that it was obvious sarcasm ANYWAY!!) and things simply start to look even worse for you. Absolutely pathetic. “And you are fantastically vain and hugely self-absorbed to attribute so much emotion, hate, industry and motive on my part to attack, criticise and demonise you based on one single post of which only four words were mine (one repeated), and to further associate me with your hoards of "enemies" and "haters" (sic)!” No dear Cort. It’s not the small number of words. First you lie, then you play the fool. What was the intention behind those words? What’s so ironic about me pointing out that JesteR was acting like a fanboy, hmm?? The only reason that you would have written that, is because you considered me to be a fanboy based on you clearly spending time reading my previous comments and remembering that it was me who had written them. You clearly felt the need to make a comment due to things that I’ve written in the that you perceive to have been ‘fanboyish’, even though I’ve been intentionally staying away from any such comments for a good while now. So it’s obvious that you clearly do pay more attention to me, and the things that I’ve said in the past than you are dishonestly claiming. “Really, you are not that important in my life, I can assure you.” Oh really!? Based on your comments, I very much doubt that. Anyway, maybe I’m not that important to you, but Sony obviously is. It seems that Sony is so important to your well being that you just can’t prevent yourself defending them from anyone who dares to demonstrate things about them that you just can’t handle. ""G1GAHATERS"? Including me? Based on that? Stop playing the poor little suffering martyr and grow up for christ's sake. But you carry on as much as you like, I will not be reading it." No, based on the fact that you don't seem to be able to contain yourself when I write two simple sentences. I often find the likes of you and certain other individuals not being able to prevent themselves from entering a conversation on a thread, totally ignoring the subject of the thread, for the sole purpose of making pointless, childish remarks about me personally. You don't have to look far for an obvious example. So I suggest that YOU grow up, stop lying, stop slithering and squirming when you know that you're just plain WRONG and keep your snide, confrontational remarks to yourself. Anonymous on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-704 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:51:33 +0000 Anonymous 704@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ G1GAHATERS LOL! Cort on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-703 Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:03:40 +0000 Cort 703@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Oh dear G1GAHURTZ, a dozen paragraphs wasted because you did not read and absorb one of mine. Believe it or not, I understand your explanation that you requested a quote targeted at a single individual, but if you bothered to read my post properly you would see that despite this, I thought the highly arbitrary and restrictive terms of your request were very convenient for you and consequently did not accept that I should be bound by them (what, do you decide the rules of discourse I must live by?). Given that you had complained about a poster calling "everyone" (a group) a fanboy I considered it perfectly reasonable to quote you using the term "all you fanboys" (a group), regardless of what *you* wanted (an individual). Get it now? And you are fantastically vain and hugely self-absorbed to attribute so much emotion, hate, industry and motive on my part to attack, criticise and demonise you based on one single post of which only four words were mine (one repeated), and to further associate me with your hoards of "enemies" and "haters" (sic)! Really, you are not that important in my life, I can assure you. "G1GAHATERS"? Including me? Based on that? Stop playing the poor little suffering martyr and grow up for christ's sake. But you carry on as much as you like, I will not be reading it. reask on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-687 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:10:56 +0000 reask 687@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ No I do actually Psychotext. The abbreviation didn't ring a bell. Psychotext on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-684 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:00:31 +0000 Psychotext 684@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ TEA is theevilaires... if you don't know his work just google the name and this site. You'll soon understand. reask on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-682 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:46:00 +0000 reask 682@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Who is TEA? tatsujin on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-680 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:38:57 +0000 tatsujin 680@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Oh I shouldn't have. I'll take a step back into the dark and let the numbers unfold for themselves. Johnny Cullen on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-679 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:25:54 +0000 Johnny Cullen 679@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ <blockquote>On the bright side, at least TEA hasn't found the forums yet. </blockquote> Shhh! Dont jinx it! tatsujin on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-678 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:43:25 +0000 tatsujin 678@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Yup, Killzone 2 is already racking large numbers alone, aside from other games like Savage Moon and Flower (altho those two are PSN). And Killzone 2 is not just hype. Have you played the game yet? I'd even tell you to play the final product. I've played the BETA for more than a month and it was such a blast, much more fun than Halo 3 and CoD4 and whatever other multiplayer you wanna throw at K2. I so feel like a fanboy saying all of this, but I'll take the hit anyways. Killzone 2 does live up to the hype. reask on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-663 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:16:14 +0000 reask 663@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ MS had a good 08 Jester. I mean exclusives are great but the multiplats are great too I mean how many people did LPB or Fable appeal to? JesteR on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-649 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:39:08 +0000 JesteR 649@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Fanboy = igoring the facts and just live the your own world. I dont ignore facts but some people here do and still claiming that the 360 had a great 08 or that MS is "hiding" their exclusives for 09 and attacking Sony for announcing exclusives for 09. G1GAHURTZ on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-643 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:06:36 +0000 G1GAHURTZ 643@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ This is the previous post that I had referred to as clearly mentioning 360 fanboys: "I still can’t believe people think there’s a difference between fanboys on one side or another. They’re all basically the same… the only difference is how defensive they feel at any particular point." Anonymous on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-642 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:03:55 +0000 Anonymous 642@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ G1GALOL! Psychotext on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-641 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:56:47 +0000 Psychotext 641@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ :O G1GAHURTZ on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-640 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:31:12 +0000 G1GAHURTZ 640@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Oh dear. You seem to be totally ignoring the entire context of the thread in order to prevent yourself from looking silly. Firstly, JesteR accused me of being a fanboy. That being specific to the individual G1GAHURTZ. It was not specific to a group of individuals. There was no ambiguity whatsoever. I then responded, referring to the individual and making a comment, to which you clearly couldn't resist making a pathetic remark about, probably based on your burning hatred of my ability to point out facts about Sony which obviously upset you. So clearly now, the context has been set. There is no question that we are talking on an individual rather than a group level. I responded to JesteR because he called me a fanboy, and you made a stupid comment trying to give the impression that my response was unjustified, because I was, in fact, a fanboy. So with the context set, and maybe it's my fault for assuming that you could think in context and not need things spelling out for you like some sort of dim child, I asked you a question. "Please search this entire website and find a single quote where I have ever specifically accused anyone of being a fanboy." So as we have established that we are working on an individual level, it's either dishonest, or just outright stupid of you to now assert that specific could be specific to a group of people. If you didn't know what I meant, then that's your fault. If you did, then you are just being pedantic in order to try and "win teh internets". The question was regarding a specific individual that I have ever accused of being a fanboy, which is not something that I do, because unlike you and your ilk, I don't find the need to start insulting people who make negative comments about Nintendo or Microsoft. I may respond to people who attack me, sure, but I don't just call people fanboys because they said something about a company that wants nothing from me other than my hard earned cash so that their executives can buy more yachts and summer retreats in Monaco. Unlike you and your young friends. Secondly, the quote doesn't need an emoticon, (which I intentionally have never used on this website) nor does it need any sort of obvious indication that it's not to be taken seriously. In fact, I only wrote that because I knew that the people with a brain would see it for what it was, whereas the deluded G1GAHATERS, which clearly includes you, would become incensed due to their short-sightedness when it comes to the things that I write. It was obviously sarcastic to those not blinded by petty hatred. This point being clear by the FACT that the previous post, iirc, clearly mentions 360 fanboys! So why would I make a comment about 360 fanboys all being the same if I am supposed to be the 'ultimate 360 fanboy'!?! Lets face it, you said something stupid to start with, your response was even worse, and now you are trying to get all pedantic and conveniently forget/ignore the context of more than one conversation. And all after I even mentioned what a good point that you made about the Edge KZ2 review... Roybott on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-634 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:39:57 +0000 Roybott 634@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ :) I dont want to get involved in this argument (although in that case this is probaly a silly thing to do...) but: "The quote IS specific in that you directly address others; it is concerned specifically with the item or subject being discussed; is peculiar or proper to a somebody or something (there is no rule that this must be singular: it may be a group or classification), as in qualities, characteristics etc; and is a statement of quality or detail." I have to say that is a fantastical overuse of punctuation in an attempt to prove your ability to use it correctly :D EDIT: That is not to say that it is an improper use... please dont bite back at me <Hides from war> Psychotext on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-633 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:38:42 +0000 Psychotext 633@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ Yay. /o\ On the bright side, at least TEA hasn't found the forums yet. Cort on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-632 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:25:40 +0000 Cort 632@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ You challenged me to find an example and I found one. And that was weak? And finding a quote in seconds is an admission that I was wrong?! Dude: WTF are you smoking? You can inflect printed words any way you want: you said you never did it but you did. I see no winking emoticon or "/sarcasm" joke. And how do you know MY post wasn't intended as a teasing or facetious rather than malevolent comment? The quote IS specific in that you directly address others; it is concerned specifically with the item or subject being discussed; is peculiar or proper to a somebody or something (there is no rule that this must be singular: it may be a group or classification), as in qualities, characteristics etc; and is a statement of quality or detail. How ironic, you do not undertsand what "specific" means, nor do you know how to use it in appropriate context. Perhaps if you had said "targetted at a SPECIFIC individual" you might have gotten away with it. But my response would have been "WTF? You are arbitrarily choosing highly restrictive terms in asking for a quote directed at a single person and not a group - which is very convenient for you given your original comment referred to "everyone" - i.e. a collective group - and not an individual". That's like saying "I've NEVER done it - apart from the times I have". G1GAHURTZ on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-631 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:04:05 +0000 G1GAHURTZ 631@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ First of all, that was clearly sarcasm based on the fact that people like you are always accusing me of being a fanboy. Perhaps you should learn the meaning of irony before trying to use it!! LOL! Secondly you clearly don't understand the meaning of specific either, so I suggest that you too go and learn English. Anyway, I'll take that weak effort as an admission that you realise that you said something totally stupid then... Good. Actually, I'm feeling quite flattered at the moment. It seems that I've managed to gain such infamy among you Sony loving lunatics that I can barely post a comment about anything without one or more of you trying to make a snide remark about me. Thanks. You make me feel like I've been doing such a good job that I might as well keep on trashing your beloved company and their flagship console. I've been intentionally going easy for a good few weeks now, but it seems that some people just want the 'old' G1GAHURTZ back! Cort on "Can Microsoft Compete with Sony In 09?" http://www.vg247.com/forum/topic.php?id=40&page=2#post-630 Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:59:36 +0000 Cort 630@http://www.vg247.com/forum/ G1GAHURTZ said: January 28, 2009 at 11:18 pm First big Killzone 2 reviews go live tomorrow "Yeah, all you fanboys are all the same." That took me about six seconds.