If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.

Kinect is dead, but accessible games are still crucial

Just like Microsoft, Brenna 180s on the topic of motion controls and accessibility.

motion_gaming

I don't like the word gamer, and I don't like the people who insist that gamers come in types, and can be clearly defined. The word almost always seems to lead to exclusions, which I find morally objectionable. "I'm a gamer," so you're not. "You're a casual gamer," whereas I'm a real one.

To me, a keyboard and mouse, or a control pad, instinctively makes a kind of sense. I say instinctively, but it's not - it's learned.

Nevertheless, gaming is an aspect of my life that stands as a dividing barrier between me and people who aren't interested in it. I hate explaining what I do for a living to people who don't live on the Internet, or think Space Invaders when they hear "video games". I hate having someone come along behind me while I'm playing a game and say something like "if you stood that close to lava you'd be dead". I hate that some of my friends don't want to spend time with me in my favourite hobbies (guys I need reliable Australian Destiny raid partners, stat).

This last one is the real sticking point. Some people just have no interest in games - any kind of games. They don't see the point. I do see the point, obviously; I also see the point of literature, and cinema, and board or card games, and knitting and gardening and pretty much everything else people derive enjoyment, enlightenment and distraction from, skilled or mindless, fruitful or wasteful.

I've always felt that part of the problem is the entry barrier. To me, a keyboard and mouse, or a control pad, instinctively makes a kind of sense. I say instinctively, but it's not - it's learned. I already know how to play almost any first person game on PC - it's just a matter of sorting out things like crouch and jump. I can guess where jump is on a control pad, as well as aim and fire, brake and accelerate. Twin stick navigation in a 3D space is second nature to me.

Good old Move! 100% dead in
the water from launch.

These are all things I learned, but when I put the controls in the hands of someone who's never done it before, I find it hard to believe I was ever so clueless. Running around staring at the floor or ceiling. Slamming into walls. Constantly asking "which button was it again?" - and not finding the answer "left bumper" helpful.

I have come to believe that simplifying game controls somehow (by cybernetic implant would suit me) is the only way gaming will ever really go mainstream the way it deserves to. A control pad, with its dozen keys, is just too intimidating. PC is better, as almost everyone can use a mouse, and interface design is getting better and better. Touch will one day be good enough to take over from pointers, I hope.

And yet I don't want to sacrifice the complexity that makes games so satisfying to me personally. I don't know why it is fun to press three keys to perform an action at the right time - there are academics who spend their whole life nailing down why and how games are fun, and whether that even matters. I just know that it is, and while I certainly derive pleasure out of games that use brains rather than reflexes, what I really like is when I'm using both.

This seems to me to be one of the hard problems of gaming as an entertainment and artistic medium, because we do want it to grow and become more inclusive (if you don't want this, you probably haven't considered how awesome it would be if the games industry weren't constantly teetering on the edge of financial ruin), but getting from hopeless beginner to twin-stick pilot to the stars is the kind of leap athletic careers are founded on.

Or is it?

Okay real talk though Kinect was worth it just for this.

Is it really that hard?

I've walked around for most of my adult life believing the world is divided into people who know how to use an analogue control pad (or WASD, or both) and those who can't.

For some reason, it's only recently occurred to me that I was ever in the latter camp, and yet somehow here I am, perfectly capable of picking up and getting the hang of any game put in front of me.

Clearly the entry barrier is not insurmountable: I'm not that clever, and I managed it. The people who leave witheringly stupid comments on video game websites did it. Those wankers you meet at gaming events who are incapable of processing the most basic information presented to them have managed it. Tiny children manage it all the time. It's clearly not that hard.

It's not like learning a language. It's not like mastering a creative art. It's not rocket science. That's not to say high-level play doesn't involve skill, talent, intellect and physical prowess. But bashing through Dynasty Warriors on easy difficulty without getting stuck against a rock for an hour? Not. Hard.

I think anybody can master a control pad, I really do. Having, for several years now, been a vocal proponent for motion gaming and other more accessible means of getting people into games, I'm balking. It's not for games to make themselves easier for people; it's for people to be less wussy about games.

Thinking back to my own efforts to learn twin stick and WASD controls, having grown up with the simple control pads of the 8-bit and 16-bit era, I remember trying both for the first time - in front of more experienced players. I felt incredibly uncomfortable. I remember giving up in frustration, embarrassed, and only coming back to it a generation on.

I have a lot of confidence issues, but I doubt I'm the only one who's been put off. I know when I offer a control pad to someone who doesn't normally game, they often get flustered - or if they're very confident, they might get angry instead. They say things like "I can't do it" or even "My brain doesn't work like that" or "There are too many buttons for me" - things I remember thinking about myself.

I believe anybody can learn to use a control pad or WASD, given practice. How much practice? I think that depends on quality, not quantity. I learned to use twin sticks properly playing GTA 3, I know that, and I'm pretty sure it was Morrowind that really taught me to WASD.

In both cases, I was playing alone, and I was obsessed with exploring the game world. I was playing for myself, alone. Not because my brothers were trying to get me to co-op something they liked and were already good at. Not because I was researching something for work. And not in a competitive environment, with screeching trash talk and the constant judgment of the game itself that I was not good enough.

I'm coming around to my point now, which is: increasing accessibility in games, opening games to more people, isn't about getting rid of "confusing" control pads (or, as I've argued elsewhere, turning the difficulty down to suit the lowest common denominator). It's not about assuming they're incapable of mastering an act literal pre-schoolers can manage and insisting they wave their arms about like excited windmills. It's about giving them a reason to try.

Build content people want to play, and believe me, they will come. After all - we're all here, aren't we?

Sign in and unlock a world of features

Get access to commenting, homepage personalisation, newsletters, and more!

In this article

PlayStation Move

PS3

Related topics
About the Author
Brenna Hillier avatar

Brenna Hillier

Contributor

Based in Australia and having come from a lengthy career in the Aussie games media, Brenna worked as VG247's remote Deputy Editor for several years, covering news and events from the other side of the planet to the rest of the team. After leaving VG247, Brenna retired from games media and crossed over to development, working as a writer on several video games.

Comments