Sections

Glow-in-the-dark condoms a pre-order bonus for inFamous: Second Son from GameStop Italy

Friday, 7th February 2014 21:15 GMT By Phil Owen

This is a new one, at least for me. If you reserve inFamous: Second Son from GameStop.it, you’ll get a rather interesting “pre-order kit.”

The kit includes two cans of Red Bull “una scatola di profilattici fluorescenti,” which is a box of condoms that glow in the dark. No, really, see for yourself.

infamous condoms

This seems like fun.
via AGB

Latest

79 Comments

  1. PEYJ

    How cliché….

    :o)

    #1 7 months ago
  2. Obernox

    :D

    #2 7 months ago
  3. polygem

    perfectly targeting the target audience

    #3 7 months ago
  4. Gekidami

    ^ Just think of all the attention you could whore wearing one of those.

    #4 7 months ago
  5. silkvg247

    Damn.. Italy only. I could have made glow in the dark rubber balloons.

    #5 7 months ago
  6. Panthro

    Glow in the dark condoms for those hard to see pre-pubescent penises.

    #6 7 months ago
  7. Cort

    Hmm. Maybe these will help The Wife find it again.

    #7 7 months ago
  8. salarta

    You know, just yesterday I was thinking “Damn, I really wish I had glow in the dark condoms so I could see which of the many many women that this game has attracted to my penis is currently watching me play inFAMOUS: Second Son (TM).” Finally, my prayers have been answered! And with my official inFAMOUS: Second Son (TM) Red Bull, I will be able to continue playing inFAMOUS: Second Son (TM) even after a full night of providing free sexual intercourse! I’m tellin’ ya, just make a full suit of inFAMOUS: Second Son (TM) discs and you’ll have to fight them off with Axe body spray.

    (I’m actually a little scared that some marketing exec out there just might be thinking of that very same marketing campaign)

    #8 7 months ago
  9. polygem

    @Gekidami
    red bull cans?

    #9 7 months ago
  10. Joe Musashi

    You’re a lot easier to tolerate when you’re not here.

    JM

    #10 7 months ago
  11. polygem

    @Joe Musashi
    i am sorry to tell you this joe but life isn´t always easy

    #11 7 months ago
  12. Legendaryboss

    @polygem The fuck is wrong with you? You were a lot easier to tolerate when you weren’t continuously writing love letters to Nintendo and not commenting on certain articles solely to add salt/attention seek: BOTH.

    PS: This is virtual life here on the internet, i hope you can tell the difference when you dish out that advice. As for that target audience remark, every business has one even your precious Nintendo: google Marketing Mix for more details.

    #12 7 months ago
  13. Legendaryboss

    @salarta LOL :P

    #13 7 months ago
  14. Legendaryboss

    @Joe Musashi That reminds me: I actually miss G1GA the only one within that forum post who stuck to his word and left for good.

    #14 7 months ago
  15. polygem

    @Legendaryboss

    look at the artdesign of the main protagonist, then look at this promo. perfectly targeting the target audience i´d say. sorry if saying this hurts your feelings. truly sorry. i apologise boss but i wont change. you could fire me.

    #15 7 months ago
  16. polygem

    @Legendaryboss

    i´m back to tame you clowns. i know you´ve missed it. i know i did :)

    #16 7 months ago
  17. Legendaryboss

    @polygem It doesn’t hurt my feelings, theres no reason why it should. Are you seriously under the impression that every business doesn’t have a target audience?

    #17 7 months ago
  18. Legendaryboss

    @Legendaryboss EDIT: So you lied? Actually things were fine and calm without you.

    #18 7 months ago
  19. polygem

    @Legendaryboss

    i didn´t attack anyone here since i´m back.

    it shows pretty damn well who it really is that starts the fire all the time. thank you for proving this to me again. i wanted to get that in check.

    i´ve changed my mind again. that´s not lying. you should learn to differentiate more. it´s all way too black and white in your head. relax. this is a videogame internet forum. a soap opera. let´s have some fun.

    i wont make this too comfortable for you. sorry about that. i will give you guys some breaks again sometimes, don´t worry. you could also learn to calm your tits more.

    #19 7 months ago
  20. Legendaryboss

    @polygem Did i say you attacked anyone? Nope. Who starts it? Comment 4, its you. Without it there would be no @5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15,16, 17, 18,19, 20. If your comment never existed how would the others? You can’t state its you not doing this.

    No you didn’t change your mind, you come onto a forum thread which was one poster leaving for good and you said good idea and you were leaving too (2nd time). Its a lie.

    The rest is a mind-blowing, mind-fuck.

    #20 7 months ago
  21. Legendaryboss

    @Legendaryboss Edit: Perfectly calm BTW, no reason to get pissed over an attention seeker who thought he needed to return to “tame clowns”.

    The sadness of it all.

    #21 7 months ago
  22. polygem

    @Legendaryboss

    i actually think it was the third (maybe fourth?) time i said i was going to leave (i´m such a diva) and i miss G1GA too. generation of posters that argued and discussed more and whined less about being butthurt by “offensive” comments like post #4. if that one “started” soemething for you than that´s clearly your own problem and not mine.

    #22 7 months ago
  23. Legendaryboss

    @polygem I was only around for the 2nd time. No ones butthurt, its not offensive: you asked who started it i gave comment 4, its where it originated from. Adding more factors doesn’t detract from who started it. How is it my problem? I never picked up on it until @13 and even then its just a complaint about your posts attracting attention. For it being a problem, its very obvious to all who commented on your post but you don’t see it. Another problem, the clown remark.

    As for contribution, i tried and you weren’t playing ball.

    #23 7 months ago
  24. polygem

    @Legendaryboss

    see lb, the question is WHY does my post #4 trigger a reaction like yours in #13?

    the moment you have figured that out for yourself we will have a foundation to discuss actual content again – but that´s not my job to do. it´s yours. take a look. don´t always ask me to explain to you why your conclusions are so flawed.

    #24 7 months ago
  25. Joe Musashi

    LB – we all know he’s a fucking troll with brand loyalty issues. He acts like he’s a 5 year old, refusing to ever take his own blatantly antagonistic behaviour into account.

    The child dances the same fucking dance with every piece-of-shit worthless bullshit post. And when the forum returns we’ll see his LOOK AT ME, LOOK AT ME schtick all over again.

    He’ll deny and deflect all of this with words.
    Then his actions will show otherwise.

    JM

    #25 7 months ago
  26. polygem

    @Joe Musashi

    says shatner and his gang

    http://www.bbakira.co.uk/cosplay/clowns.jpg

    GRRRRRRR!

    #26 7 months ago
  27. Joe Musashi

    ^^ Deflection #1.

    JM

    #27 7 months ago
  28. polygem

    and back on topic. whats wrong with post #4? the post that shows all this…

    #28 7 months ago
  29. polygem

    a guy who has a youtube channel (or had one or whatever) and the banned guy signing every post with the initials of his internet character teaming up to call others attention seekers. classic :) it´s just good fun and the reason you have won my heart.

    #29 7 months ago
  30. Legendaryboss

    @polygem Why?
    A. Every business has a target audience, thats why i asked you that question (18) and asked you to google marketing mix (13)
    B. You made it perfectly clear your not within the target audience (forum posts), commenting on a business fulfilling that demand of the target audience you don’t approve of is frankly echoing of bitterness and it shows.
    C. This is one region (see article) doing that deal (ATM) and the target audience you were talking about is either worldwide or germany (Again: forum posts)
    D. Adding salt (13) or rather this page needed salt (See Sony earnings articles)
    E. Attention seeking (13): in almost every post, this is no different.

    Three reasons have already been explicitly stated @13 & 18, covered in the article and covered elsewhere. I have stated three reasons and given additional reasons, they are all here (and in other articles) in black and white, your just overlooking them. Why do you think @5 focused on attention when responding to you? The moment this was already figured out has passed you. My conclusions are irrelevant and i would never ask you to critique them.

    #30 7 months ago
  31. Legendaryboss

    @polygem Edit: Not others, just you.

    #31 7 months ago
  32. Legendaryboss

    @Legendaryboss Edit 2: You have quite the obsession with that YT channel, its almost sad. Wait! Its completely sad.

    #32 7 months ago
  33. polygem

    @Legendaryboss
    i never said anything against having a target audience for a product. that totally makes sense of course.
    yes i clearly don´t see myself as the target audience for this game. that doesn´t mean that this is making me a bitter person. i´m not even judging the target audience of this game. if that´s still something that triggers a negative reaction in you or others, then again, that´s more your problem than mine. clearly is.

    #33 7 months ago
  34. polygem

    @Legendaryboss

    it´s sad that it´s so easy for you to call out others while completely refusing to reflect your own behaviour. your neverending ping pong game with francis showed that very very clearly. it was a sad show lb. desperate too. the you tube argument in my last post means: a guy who has (or had) a youtube channel, fishing for clicks (beware, i´m not judging this) calling other people attention seekers just is, no matter how you look at it, a tragical farce.

    and this pretty much sums up again why it´s hard for me to listen to criticism coming from you.

    #34 7 months ago
  35. Joe Musashi

    More denial. More deflection.

    Antagonistic child, after derailing and trolling, attempts to deflect any criticism and make out that anyone taking issue with his deliberately antagonistic behaviour has a character flaw. Invests heavily into conspiracy theories and make-believe, shunning logic and reality.

    Child begs for attention.
    Child gets attention.
    Child perpetuates cycle
    Child insists everyone but him is to blame.

    More deflection incoming.

    JM

    #35 7 months ago
  36. Joe Musashi

    It’s also worth noting that when the child had flounced away and spared the community their childish bullshit:

    This type of dialogue didn’t take place. At all.

    The very instant the child returns to start posting their antagonistic bullshit, this trend returns. Unsurprisingly revolving around the child’s efforts to derail and seek attention.

    The very clear logic shows what the catalyst is. Whose behaviour perpetuates these dialogues. It was abundantly clear for the last couple of years.

    But the (welcome) hiatus in the child’s posting and the (equally welcome) hiatus in the bullshit dialogues is so closely synchronised that only a child-in-denial would dispute the clear relationship.

    JM

    #36 7 months ago
  37. polygem

    @Joe Musashi

    look at post number 4 and what you guys did with it. speaks for itself. absolutely. clearly does. the more you add the funnier it gets.

    #37 7 months ago
  38. LB

    @polygem Can’t log in to my main account, so i will use the emergency one. Comment was bitter, not the person.

    “your neverending ping pong game with francis showed that very very clearly. it was a sad show lb.”
    It is never-ending but WAS a sad show? I’m sorry but that implies its something that happens all the time but was a show to watch. Poly link my recent argument with Francis there hasn’t been one for a few weeks now.

    More YT obsession, point covered. Wait i’ll give you a little more, the fact that the story hinges on possibility and not fact and is a debunked conspiracy theory really says it all. So to sum that up: a sad YT obsession.

    Its not just me calling you an attention seeker, its not just JM, its not just Gekidami, its not just Dragon, Its not just zoopdeloop. They have all called you it or something similar before, i just came to the conclusion yesterday.

    “and this pretty much sums up again why it´s hard for me to listen to criticism coming from you.” Oh you hold your hands to your ears and say LALALALALALALALALLALALA and ignore it, great. Okay then maybe i will use your words to get one point covered across.

    “this page needed some salt again. no need to thank me.” That was your reasoning for your comment right here:
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/02/06/sonys-playstation-division-sales-up-64-to-4-2-billion/#comment-584146

    http://www.vg247.com/2014/02/07/the-last-of-us-2-new-ip-ideas-being-brainstormed-now-says-naughty-dog/#comment-584387 Was there any need for that comment? Nope.

    http://www.vg247.com/2014/02/07/d-i-c-e-awards-2014-watch-the-ceremony-here-all-winners-as-they-happen/#comment-584388

    Polygem it is not just me criticising you.

    #38 7 months ago
  39. LB

    @polygem And look at post 17, calling people clowns. Look at post 27 calling someone part of gang which is strange because i remember you taking offence to being called a mafia member and wrongly accusing me of calling you it, which you admitted you had no clue who called you.

    As for reflecting my behaviour:
    Okay people said i linked loads of gifs so i toned that down. One person stated my posts contained negativity with a hint of rationality towards something, so i adjusted. People stated that me using a certain phrase was annoying so i stopped using it. Your turn.

    #39 7 months ago
  40. vOL

    MEN! CEASE FIRE!

    #40 7 months ago
  41. polygem

    @LB

    oh so you have several accounts here. i didn´t expect that, well tbh, i did. several youtubes as well? i think you´re not the only one around here using alt accounts. sadly. that´s why i don´t give a shit about the few same guys criticising me for posts that are not “needed” only because they don´t like the sound of those. deal with it. maybe i don´t like your favourite game. you can disagree and call me anything you like. that´s fine. i´m not complainig about that. i´m only complaining about your janus faced conclusions. they need a correction from time to time.

    btw would you kindly link my last “nintendo loveletter” (since you asked me to link your francis debates) because there hasn´t been one either for a month or so (actually there never was one but i know you like to call it like that).

    i recall giving nintendo a straight fuck you though because of their mc donalds happy meal promo but that was probably only me seeking for attention again :)

    paint it as you desire. no problem.

    you are proving my point over and over again. grow the fuck up.

    #41 7 months ago
  42. polygem

    @LB

    “As for reflecting my behaviour:
    Okay people said i linked loads of gifs so i toned that down. One person stated my posts contained negativity with a hint of rationality towards something, so i adjusted. People stated that me using a certain phrase was annoying so i stopped using it. Your turn.”

    hmm, let´s see. i came here posting this:

    “perfectly targeting the target audience”

    then this triggered this:

    “^ Just think of all the attention you could whore wearing one of those.”

    “You’re a lot easier to tolerate when you’re not here.”

    “@polygem The fuck is wrong with you? You were a lot easier to tolerate when you weren’t continuously writing love letters to Nintendo and not commenting on certain articles solely to add salt/attention seek: BOTH.” that´s from you btw.
    .
    .
    .
    well and so on. again, not complainig about these reactions at all but they speak for themselves, reveal the inner attitude really…and then you got the nerves to tell ME that i need to refelct about my behaviour to adjust it and tell me that YOU are the one who has learned the lesson?

    in this case let me play the sad clown please.

    #42 7 months ago
  43. LB

    @polygem “oh so you have several accounts here. i didn´t expect that, well tbh, i did. several youtubes as well?” I have had this since the site redesign and already admitted it. Right here see? I gave a reason here.
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/27/vg247-relaunches-the-new-features-and-what-they-mean-to-you/#comment-583328
    YT obsession is still a conspiracy theory with more several YT accounts another one. But you don’t see the difference do you? I admitted this is an ALT account and admitted that is not channel.

    “btw would you kindly link my last “nintendo love letter”
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/30/mario-kart-8-coming-in-may-game-pad-is-wii-us-weakness-nintendo-briefing/#comment-583186
    That was less than 2 weeks ago. Go to 12, 15 etc. etc and you what really is ironic my ALT account LB is there you replied after my post and never bothered to comment on it like you done now.

    “because there hasn´t been one either for a month or so” There hasn’t? So that comment was just another one based without logic.

    “i recall giving nintendo a straight fuck you though because of their mc donalds happy meal promo but that was probably only me seeking for attention again” I remember, still doesn’t detract from what i said, actually nothing you replied with has.

    “you are proving my point over and over again. grow the fuck up.” Like you did for me yesterday. As for that last bit, look at your posts and then come back.

    I going to show you something, while you were away on your break:

    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/30/nintendo-not-targeting-children-enough-iwata/
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/29/nintendo-iwata-will-take-50-pay-cut-following-financial-report/
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/23/nintendo-was-dead-to-us-very-quickly-says-ea-source/
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/29/wii-u-zelda-hd-super-mario-3d-world-sold-over-1m-units/
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/17/its-time-for-iwata-to-step-down-from-nintendo-opinion/
    http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/17/nintendo-our-sales-will-fail-to-meet-forecast-by-a-large-margin/
    The articles were fine and calm and didn’t get too much out of hand.

    Then your appearance http://www.vg247.com/2013/12/18/nintendo-direct-dec-18-all-the-news-and-trailers-as-they-come/

    #43 7 months ago
  44. polygem

    @LB

    “More YT obsession, point covered. Wait i’ll give you a little more, the fact that the story hinges on possibility and not fact and is a debunked conspiracy theory really says it all. So to sum that up: a sad YT obsession.”

    more like your “sad obession”. i´m not talking about this uncharted2007 sony fanboy channel – if that´s yours or not. i give a fuck. i meant, the fact that you run one (or used to run one, you said that), a broadcast YOURSELF video channel…………………..then you go on and got the nerves to call others attention seekers. sorry but i can´t help it. it´s funny.

    #44 7 months ago
  45. Joe Musashi

    My comments are not a direct response to your effort in #4.

    You can stop that line of bullshit conspiracy theory right now. Along with all the rest.

    JM

    #45 7 months ago
  46. LB

    @polygem Edit: “then you got the nerves to tell ME that i need to refelct about my behaviour to adjust it and tell me that YOU are the one who has learned the lesson?

    You brought it up and the lesson that just more speculation on your part. Right you should get away with calling people clowns, telling me to grow the fuck up, adding salt of page because its needed, accusing someone of being in gang etc. etc. You want to get away it, go right ahead.

    “I never picked up on it until @13 and even then its just a complaint about your posts attracting attention. ” I think you forgot about this.

    #46 7 months ago
  47. polygem

    @LB

    my posts in that link are freaking nintendo loveletters?

    i disagree with that completely. it was a refelcted opinion. nothing more. nothing less.

    again, look lb, the reason that the nintendo articles have been perfectly fine is because you and some other guys don´t overreact to some ghost nintendo loveletters that aren´t even there in the first place.

    again, look at this thread. it´s the PERFECT example to see how this works. this is not so much about me than it is about you. or us when we connect on a weird level :)

    #47 7 months ago
  48. LB

    @polygem Ah whats more ironic you condemned me for calling your friend a fanboy (I didn’t) and now you have done the same more than twice, i think you should follow your own lead and condemn yourself.

    “the fact that you run one (or used to run one, you said that), a broadcast YOURSELF video channel.” You don’t know what is or what it looks like or have any remote clue about it, my word. I mean how call you make any judgement of what it is. I can’t keep stating how much this YT obsession is pure conspiracy.

    I’m not calling “others” an attention seeker, YOU YOU YOU YOU YOU. I am calling YOU an attention seeker not others.

    #48 7 months ago
  49. LB

    @polygem “the reason that the nintendo articles have been perfectly fine is because you and some other guys don´t overreact to some ghost nintendo loveletters that aren´t even there in the first place.”

    THANK YOU! Fucking yes! YES! Thats it. Okay that surprised me.

    #49 7 months ago
  50. LB

    @polygem Don’t worry Poly we hit the conclusion.

    #50 7 months ago
  51. polygem

    @LB:
    nitpicking but well, let´s sum it up (again). you are calling me an attention seeker while you´re the one running a broadcast yourself show.
    that was my point. this sums up why your argumentation and it´s conclusions are so often deeply flawed. you are looking in the wrong direction even from the starting line. no need to even start running then….unless you want to look weird.

    #51 7 months ago
  52. LB

    @polygem So much wrongness, already debunked: we’re done.

    #52 7 months ago
  53. polygem

    @LB #50

    so it´s not you who´s helping to “extend” this thread as well?

    just want to understand your logic

    #53 7 months ago
  54. LB

    @LB Edit: Nah your point is to use conspiracy theories and make stuff up to get your goal. Keep going but this should be done.

    #54 7 months ago
  55. polygem

    @LB

    so we´re not done huh?

    wait….by your logic that must clearly make you a liar. (or did i get something wrong while you explained me this?)

    again lb, grow the fuck up.

    what now. can we be friends, learn and forget or shall we play this shit game forever?

    seriously asking you this again but it takes two.

    #55 7 months ago
  56. LB

    @polygem My logic is simple and i am not going through it again.

    #56 7 months ago
  57. LB

    @polygem Okay yep thats lies i can admit that. Interesting so your calling me a liar but when i draw that same conclusion from your leaving forever stage, its simply me needing to “learn to differentiate more.”

    U so funny.

    #57 7 months ago
  58. polygem

    ok then but i didn´t have any goal but saying what i said in post number 4. no conspiracy theories needed to get to a goal that doesn´t exist. it´s what you internet kids made out of it and i don´t give a fuck.

    i think your logic is a bit too simple – that makes it severely flawed.

    #58 7 months ago
  59. LB

    @polygem
    “i think your logic is a bit too simple – that makes it severely flawed.” U so funny.

    “no conspiracy theories needed to get to a goal that doesn´t exist. it´s what you internet kids made out of it and i don´t give a fuck.” That sounds vaguely similar to something i said what was that?

    “Who starts it? Comment 4, its you. Without it there would be no @5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15,16, 17, 18,19, 20. If your comment never existed how would the others? You can’t state its you not doing this.”

    Oh okay its what we internet kids (a condescending tone) make of it:
    You didn’t call anyone clowns (17)
    You didn’t tell someone to grow the fuck up. (42)
    You never said “this page needed some salt again. no need to thank me.” That was your reasoning for your comment right here: http://www.vg247.com/2014/02/06/sonys-playstation-division-sales-up-64-to-4-2-billion/#comment-584146
    None of that happened? Correct?

    #59 7 months ago
  60. polygem

    @LB

    polygem: “prefectly targeting the target audience”

    legendaryboss:” @polygem The fuck is wrong with you? You were a lot easier to tolerate when you weren’t continuously writing love letters to Nintendo and not commenting on certain articles solely to add salt/attention seek: BOTH.”

    it really really says it all. everything we posted after that might have been some fun internet ping pong but it wasn´t really needed. still fun though.

    #60 7 months ago
  61. LB

    @polygem Standalone and as is i would see your point but thats been justified “its just a complaint about your posts attracting attention” and like i said “As for contribution, i tried and you weren’t playing ball.” But that entire post was completely in response this:

    You: “perfectly targeting the target audience” and “i am sorry to tell you this joe but life isn´t always easy.”

    Me: “@polygem The fuck is wrong with you? You were a lot easier to tolerate when you weren’t continuously writing love letters to Nintendo and not commenting on certain articles solely to add salt/attention seek (complaint about other articles): BOTH. PS: This is virtual life here on the internet, i hope you can tell the difference when you dish out that advice (12). As for that target audience remark (4), every business has one even your precious Nintendo: google Marketing Mix for more details.”

    So let me get this clear, your not going to address any of my points?

    #61 7 months ago
  62. polygem

    Joe Musashi
    You’re a lot easier to tolerate when you’re not here.
    JM

    polygem
    @Joe Musashi
    i am sorry to tell you this joe but life isn´t always easy

    your style of taking everything out of context might work pretty often for you but it certainly doesn´t work if you use this tactic in the same thread.

    #62 7 months ago
  63. polygem

    ^edit@last lb post

    #63 7 months ago
  64. LB

    @polygem http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNrc0VzzmKE

    #64 7 months ago
  65. polygem

    like a boss

    http://www.alohastone.com/wp-content/uploads/like-a-boss.jpg

    #65 7 months ago
  66. LB

    @polygem http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6xc1yzAWK1qfnllzo1_500.gif

    #66 7 months ago
  67. polygem

    this whole discussion is a huge flashback

    http://giphy.com/gifs/rBYc4tkIeLCNy

    #67 7 months ago
  68. Legendaryboss

    @polygem The creepy gifs is back!

    #68 7 months ago
  69. Legendaryboss

    @polygem The creepy gifs is back! And so is main account.

    #69 7 months ago
  70. polygem

    :)

    #70 7 months ago
  71. Dragon

    I am leaving forever…
    …back in 30 days.

    Tells everything about self-control the guy has.

    #71 7 months ago
  72. polygem

    @Dragon

    choosing a screenname like dragon shows everything about your own self control really

    but anyway i am leaving forever now

    #72 7 months ago
  73. polygem

    but then, some guys have a nasty habit of returning

    http://giphy.com/gifs/ppzoTh5JoUHio

    http://giphy.com/gifs/XGmDhDAABi40M

    http://giphy.com/gifs/rJsaz0W10i4Sc

    http://giphy.com/gifs/122tZ82mlAGcBa

    http://giphy.com/gifs/apzqh5nwLrG8g

    #73 7 months ago
  74. salarta

    Only at VG247 does a silly article about glow-in-the-dark condoms turn into 74 comments where the majority of them are people arguing with each other.

    #74 7 months ago
  75. Ireland Michael

    75 comments of people bickering back and forth?

    Impressive.

    #75 7 months ago
  76. bennyx

    Yawnnnnnnnnnn
    Could you little children stop bickering and grow up………….thanks!!

    I better grow up too, don’t know about you lot but I’m gonna go to Italy to get me this!!! Hahaha

    #76 7 months ago
  77. Hyperx64

    A letter to the chef http://youtu.be/7avWjBmRXu0?t=52s ;)

    #77 7 months ago
  78. Djoenz

    Holyfuck man I couldnt sign in for dayz! WTF is going on>>>>>???????

    #78 7 months ago
  79. DuckOfDestiny

    All this talk of the target audience, surely it can’t be gamers. As we all know, gaming nerds don’t get laid.

    #79 7 months ago

Comments are now closed on this article.