Mon, Feb 18, 2013 | 08:59 GMT

UK Charts: Aliens Colonial Marines takes top

Aliens: Colonial Marines has shot to the top of the UK charts, netting a bigger opening weekend that fellow space hopping shooter Dead Space 3.

It comes as Aliens: Colonial Marines received a negative critical reaction in the press. Despite this, the game has entered the UK Chart at number one.

Here’s the chart so far:

1. Aliens: Colonial Marines
2. Dead Space 3
3. FIFA 13
4. Call of Duty: Black Ops 2
5. Far Cry 3
6. Assassin’s Creed 3
7. Need for Speed: Most Wanted
8. Just Dance 4
9. Sonic & All-Stars Racing Transformed
10. Halo 4

What do you make of that then?

21 comments

#1

aseddon130
18/02/13, 9:01 am

Soon it will drop to £20 and the likes of CeX and GAME will have many preowned copies to sell.

#2

manamana
18/02/13, 9:05 am

O_o must be that the majority isn’t caring for reviews?

#3

Beta
18/02/13, 9:09 am

The majority of gamers almost never read critic reviews.

Aliens name still sells apparently.

#4

Francis O
18/02/13, 9:17 am

If its a shooter…. people will buy it. Meanwhile games like Sly 4 and PlayStation All stars are forgotten because their are no guns. I kinda hate Western gaming.

#5

YoungZer0
18/02/13, 9:31 am

All Stars has guns and it’s not a good game.

#6

Mike W
18/02/13, 9:32 am

Sly 4 is good though.

#7

Gnosis
18/02/13, 9:41 am

Sly will be released in Europe on March 29th. It’s simply not out yet.

#8

PapaJustify
18/02/13, 9:43 am

Sly 4 isn’t out in EU yet. That is why it doesn’t show up (mind, if it even would).

I am completely clueless how A:CM could sell so much. It is a shame because such a game doesn’t deserve to sell so well, while other, great games often get no attention.

#9

psxman
18/02/13, 9:46 am

“Meanwhile games like Sly 4 and PlayStation All stars are forgotten because no one is aware they exist”.

Fixed.

#10

YoungZer0
18/02/13, 9:55 am

@9: That too! Fucking Sony and their shitty marketing agency.

#11

Edo
18/02/13, 10:04 am

@2 and @3 The game wasn’t reviewed until the release date,funny how review embargo works like that.

#12

KrazyKraut
18/02/13, 10:27 am

two possibilities: consumers are stupid as shit or game isn’t that bad

#13

SplatteredHouse
18/02/13, 10:30 am

#14

melonbuster1
18/02/13, 10:35 am

I wanted the wiiu version. But it wasn’t even released and from all the bad press I decided to gamefly it 1st. I still want to play it .

#15

ududy
18/02/13, 11:01 am

Oh, it’s not extraordinarily bad. Just extremely average, looks like something that should have shipped six years ago, has no ambitions concerning gameplay or plot. But it’s an Aliens game, and people expected and were entitled to much better. Maybe the worst thing about it, for a fan of the universe, is how they transformed the aliens from the ultimate living horror to stupid cannon fodder.

#16

daytripper
18/02/13, 11:07 am

Another horrendous game outselling far better titles

#17

ArcticMonkey
18/02/13, 11:36 am

The Horror… And I went on about how people wanted true survival horror games… opps. Maybe it’s the Aliens name or Gearbox, to a lesser extent, but wow.

#18

Stardog
18/02/13, 12:24 pm

Advertising is king. There are ads all over the place.

#19

The_Red
18/02/13, 12:50 pm

That is rather shameful. No offense to Sega but that game should have bombed and GearBox should been sued by Sega (Yes, they are both to blame here but what Gearbox did is pretty much what Silicon Knights did before its shameful fall).

#20

Cool P
18/02/13, 1:52 pm

Just like MoH: Warfighter, it sells beacause of its name. And as said in previous coments, this game doesn’t deserve to sell well.

#21

karma
18/02/13, 5:08 pm

Wow. Sometimes I am ashamed to be a brit.
Sega aren’t daft, they know the Aliens franchise has a huge following, and they know they can consistently put out bad Aliens games and still sell a boat load. One things for sure, there will be an awful lot of cheap trade ins on shelves in the not to distant future. As a huge Aliens fan myself, I may even pick up a copy just to see how bad the game really is.

Leave a Reply