Crysis 3′s New York setting not the easy way out for Crytek

Wednesday, 25th April 2012 23:57 GMT By Brenna Hillier

Crytek isn’t recycling assets from Crysis 2 for Crysis 3, despite their shared setting.

“One thing I want to underline is that we did not do this because it’s easier for us,” Crytek’s director of creative development Rasmus Hojengaard stressed, speaking to Rock Paper Shotgun.

“All of the assets have been created from the ground-up. There is nothing left of the New York you saw in Crysis 2. As you saw in the demo, there’s no resemblance to what we did before.”

“I mean, the example I’ve used is let’s say there’s a war, and your hometown is bombed, and so is your friend’s. Going to see your hometown is going to be completely different from your friend’s because you already have a connection to that place versus a place you’ve never been before. Although it’s obviously not the same [with Crysis 3], it’s still a little bit of that principle.”

In a chat with Polygon, Hojengaard said Crytek really wanted to do something different this time.

“At the same time everybody was really in love with the idea of bringing heavy vegetation back into the game, like whenever you haven’t done something for a while, you want to go back and do that again,” he added.

“At the same time, there was also something cool about the urban situation, but we didn’t want to create something we had seen before. So we said why don’t we merge the two, and create an organic city, basically, an organic urban scenario.”

Crytek has a reputation to uphold graphics-wise and is working to live up to it.

“We’re still in production, but we’re doing stuff far and above what we could do in Crysis 2,” he said.

“From a technical point of view, we’re prototyping render features now that have never been seen on consoles before from any studio. We’ll need to see what we can actually use in the final game, since it all boils down to performance, but it looks pretty promising.”

The developer mentioned new vegetation and lens flare systems, as well as “parallax occlusion mapping” on consoles, something that wasn’t even possible on PC until a DirectX 11 update to Crysis 2.

“We actually managed to figure out ways to use that on console. Obviously it’s not in the exact same way as on PC, but the end result is largely the same,” Hojengaard said.

“We’ll push as much as we possibly can in the hardware performance spectrum. We want to push the high-end benchmark of what’s possible on PC, but also on consoles.”

Hit the links above to check out the full interview features for plenty more Crysis 3 action. The shooter is expected in northern spring 2013, for PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360.



  1. albo88

    i have the feeling that it will be another port well away they say they using cry engine 3 so yep we all ready see that in action and trust me even high res pack and dx 11 pack cant change the low res tenures
    you find them everywhere in buildings glass cars all around the game

    #1 3 years ago
  2. Charlie Sheen

    @1 why are people like you called gamers?

    #2 3 years ago
  3. Scared

    Is it going to be a ‘high end PC benchmark’ on release or after 6 months again?

    #3 3 years ago
  4. Talkar

    I’m looking forward to this game!
    Oh wait i forgot, this is an EA game. So i guess i should hate it right?

    #4 3 years ago
  5. mehdidante

    what about taking about story and gameplay . dragon age : origins graphic is not high end but still a wonderfull game which i’ve played more than 100 hours .

    #5 3 years ago
  6. endgame

    @5 Story? Really? These guys are software engineers. They don’t know what the word “story” means.

    #6 3 years ago
  7. xxJPRACERxx

    PC version for me but still impress about what these old consoles can do.

    #7 3 years ago

Comments are now closed on this article.