Thu, Sep 29, 2011 | 17:50 BST
Report – PC version of Assassin’s Creed: Revelations delayed
Eurogamer is reporting that the PC version of Assassin’s Creed: Revelations has been delayed to December 2 while the console versions are still on course for a November release. The announcement was revealed by the Czech Ubisoft Facebook page (via EG.cz). Ubisoft has been contacted for confirmation of the news.


19 comments
#1
badboy_122
29/09/11, 5:50 pm
of course … I expected that
#2
Erthazus
29/09/11, 5:51 pm
LOL
#3
Talkar
29/09/11, 5:52 pm
ehm… Surprise? xD
#4
Metal Gear
29/09/11, 6:00 pm
“It lives: I Am Alive becomes PSN, XBLA affair this winter”
“PC version of Assassin’s Creed: Revelations delayed”
Ubifail.
#5
Maximum Payne
29/09/11, 6:00 pm
Well its only one month delay compare to other assassins which were like 4-5 months
#6
Yoshi
29/09/11, 6:05 pm
SHOCKER
@5 Weren’t the others delayed a month then extended XD
#7
KillerDD
29/09/11, 6:10 pm
To be honest I don’t mind at all!! I’m buying 4 games in a week, it’s kind of expensive for me! At least that’s 79 Euro’s less for me in November!
#8
Hunam
29/09/11, 6:20 pm
To be honest, if anyone actually believed the PC version was coming out on the same days the console ones they deserve a slap.
#9
albo88
29/09/11, 6:43 pm
the least game i buoyed from ubishit for PC was far cry 2 just for the map editor that game was awesome online
but now they are fucking up every time so yeah if they wont to trite us all like hackers that we just hack and dont buy then like that ill be ill just hack the game who cares i just wont the single player multiplayer on AC series is shit anyway
#10
NeoSquall
29/09/11, 7:27 pm
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
I FUCKING KNEW IT.
#11
Edo
29/09/11, 7:29 pm
More time for Arkham City and And Skyrim.
#12
Lahanas
29/09/11, 8:24 pm
LOL. I like that they always wait until the game’s release is close to announce the pc delay. Once again, ubi trolling the pc nerds!
#13
YoungZer0
29/09/11, 9:02 pm
We need more time to implement our new and less-broken* DRM.
*Not really
#14
ultramega
30/09/11, 3:21 am
Nothing to see here. Same as always. At least the PC versions are better though. I can’t complain about that.
#15
Edo
30/09/11, 9:06 am
#14 Actually they are not,only the first one,was optimised as it should be ,the other two were awful console ports(even though they were both delayed),for instance I can ran both Metro 2033(on very high)and The Witcher 2(everything on except uber sampling)with 40 FPS average.On the other hand I couldn’t get even 30 FPS either on AC 2 or Brotherhood and not even on the highest settings!Not to mention the fact that Metro 2033 and The Witcher 2 are several times more demanding on hardware than any Assassin’s Creed game.
#16
NeoSquall
30/09/11, 10:02 am
@15 that’s a problem in your rig, because I had neither of your issues with both AC sequels, compared to Metro 2033 and The Witcher 2
#17
Edo
30/09/11, 10:41 am
#16 Yeah..I don’t think so dude,the problem is bad optimisation for PC or should I say consolitis.My rig specs goe way above recommended system requirements for Assassin’s Creed games.
#18
Maximum Payne
30/09/11, 2:10 pm
@17 I played on my (now old PC) dual core amd @2.0 ghz and Nvida 8600 Gt every assassin Creed on 1024*768 on medium-high
#19
Edo
30/09/11, 2:37 pm
#18 So!?who says that I can’t play it!?