Fri, May 27, 2011 | 13:52 BST

Modern Warfare 3 shown in London – shots, impressions

Activision officially pulls the curtain back on what will almost inevitably be the biggest game of the year. New screens, gameplay details.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Out November 8 worldwide.

Joint development between Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games.

Follow-up to Modern Warfare 2, UK’s best-selling game of all time.

Kept closely under wraps since West and Zampella’s controversial sacking from Infinity Ward

Rather than waiting for E3, which by the looks of it is hardly going to be short on fucking HUGE announcements, Activision has decided to show the next instalment in the unstoppable Call of Duty franchise a few weeks ahead of time. In a North London studio on Monday, Infinity Ward’s Robert Bowling and Sledgehammer Games’ Glen Schofield took to the stage together to demonstrate

Of course, Modern Warfare is particularly interesting this year because of the ex-Infinity Ward execs versus Activision wrangling that’s been plastered all over this and every other website since the middle of last year. Then there’s the collaboration with Sledgehammer Games, which also raises an eyebrow. What direction will these two studios take the series in? Are we going further down the setpiece-heavy action movie Modern Warfare 2 route, or will this new title reclaim the tension and relative seriousness of the original Modern Warfare?

On the evidence of this reveal demonstration, we’re definitely looking at the former. What we saw was heavily, heavily scripted, all-action setpiecing – but good lord, these are some impressive setpieces. As the latest trailer shows, Modern Warfare takes place in cities all over the world, from Paris to New York, London and, from the looks of it, Berlin. We saw what looks to be the opening level, set in the Big Apple, before being transported to Canary Wharf for a second mission.

“All-out war”

Modern Warfare 3 picks up immediately after the end of MW2, with the world in a state of all-out war. The level opens as the player pulls himself out of a crashed helicopter on a New York street amid the familiar, cacophonous noise of gunfire and explosions, as a nearby sergeant screams at him to get out of the wreckage. Our first glimpse of the city is a vertical view up to the sky, the sun blooming between skyscrapers as the helicopter door is forced open – then we’re chucked some ammunition and told to make our way to the stock exchange.

Modern Warfare 3 picks up immediately after the end of MW2, with the world in a state of all-out war.

As our demonstrator fights his way through the streets and buildings of New York, recognisable landmarks like the Crown building and the stock exchange itself stand out a mile. Enemies take cover behind boardroom couches, jewelery store counters shatter under gunfire as he sprints out into the street from a department store, and a copter, broken blades still spinning, is lodged in the side of a skyscraper.

This, along with the dirtied American flags drooping over the wreckage and the blown-out cop cars littering the streets, is powerful imagery, designed (rather like Homefront’s) to get right at the heart of America’s power complex. It’s all narrow street combat, as befits New York’s close, vertiginous streets and grid-like layout.

“Powerful imagery”

On the roof of the stock exchange, our demonstrator uses a Reaper drone to clear the rooftops around of enemies before leaping onto a fast-departing extraction helicopter. What follows is a ridiculously high-octane air battle, with the player holding onto the mounted machine gun as the pilot waves around towering skyscrapers, evading the missiles of pursuers.

We couldn’t help but notice at this juncture that the actual buildings, despite being hit with missile after missile from this airborne firefight, displayed no progressive damage – not so much as a bullet-hole. At one point in particular, when the fight centered around a skyscraper still under construction, the plastic netting, steel constructs and random materials seemed entirely unbothered by the constant stream of bullets, until a helicopter crashed into it and everything promptly ignited.

Eventually, our own copter was hit, sending it spinning downwards and bashing into buildings whilst our demonstrator hung out of the door by his fingertips. It’s worth mentioning at this point that MW3 is as good-looking as you’d expect, the lack of dynamic destruction notwithstanding. Schofield mentions that it’s running at a constant 60fps, which is not difficult to believe.

MW3′s first gameplay trailer from earlier
this week.

The next mission is set in London’s Canary Wharf, and starts out as a covert operation before exploding into a full-on assault on the docks. This being London, it’s rainy, dark and atmospheric – the tall buildings of Canary Wharf’s skyline tower blearily in the background, their lights blurred through the damp.

There’s support from helicopters, whose sweeping searchlights cut through the gloom to illuminate enemies (who don’t seem to have much of an instinct for cover or self-preservation, incidentally, but in this series, they never have.) Sniper lasers, too, penetrate the darkness – this is hardly a one-man war.

It’s the conclusion of this section that provides the demo’s most impressive set-piece of all, a chase after tube train full of enemies down the sprawling tunnels of the London Underground. Manning the mounted machine gun on a truck, you’re in hot pursuit, veering wildly out of the way of oncoming trains and trying to avoid mowing down the fleeing passengers as you zoom past a platform.

You can catch a glimpse of what happens next in the trailer – the tube train explodes, flies off the rails, and proceeds to demolish what looks like half of the structural support of the Underground. It really is a hell of a spectacle.

It’s interesting to see FPS developers moving en masse towards urban combat as opposed to the dusty desert-style battlefields that have been obsessing them for the past few years. There’s an undeniable black thrill to seeing such iconic symbols of modernity torn apart by war, to fighting in a setting that’s familiar.

The battle ahead

Here’s the question we’re all thinking about, though: is it as good as Battlefield 3? DICE’s shooter definitely had the more jaw-dropping reveal demonstration, showing astonishing destructibility, tense pacing and serious graphical grunt that the Modern Warfare 3 demo did not match – but then it was running on a PC the size of a Shetland pony. What Modern Warfare 3 shows us is gameplay running on a console, locked at 60fps – Battlefield 3 isn’t possibly going to be able to do that.

This MW3 demo also had the edge in terms of sheer full-on sensory assault – stuff never stopped happening for a second. (Given that Modern Warfare 2 knew how to change the pace up at least a little, though, we can assume that the finished game will give us a little more time to catch our breath.)

This is the first year in a long time where we’ve had real, tooth-and-nail competition at the top of the shooter ladder. Activision has a lot more to worry about here than they did with Medal of Honor last year. When Infinity Ward/Sledgehammer and DICE start putting their multiplayer cards on the table, this is going to escalate into an all-out war for the shooter-fan dollar.

And let’s remember, that’s extremely good for us. It will drive creativity and change in a genre that, let’s be honest, hasn’t really been known for either of those things in a while. It’s going to be an interesting year.

Modern Warfare 3 ships for PC, PS3 and 360 on November 8.

71 comments

#51

deadstoned
26/05/11, 5:45 pm

Spoliers:

Here’s your objective: Blah blah blah blah, Secret Base. Blah blah blah land. Blah blah blah Nuclear missile blah. Blah blah blah counting on you, utmost importance, win, good luck.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE_msAKWdOs

#52

ManuOtaku
26/05/11, 5:49 pm

I do prefer Battefield BC II, for me is the best multiplayer FPS game, with halo reachComing really close , and like so many before me stated, i dont hate COD, i like it a lot too in the past, for me the best on the singleplayer and multiplayer front was COD 2, since then it became almost the same thing whitout any innovation, especially in the last four games, i dont see this changing with MW3, therefore i will not buy it, and i will buy Battlefield 3, but if i see in some reviews that theres something new and with a little touch of innovation then i will try COD MW3, but like other put it i blame activision for this,is the way they work, and thats the reason why the thing with IW happened last year, they didnt want this to the COD franchise, i mean repeat the same thing year after year, whitout anything new to say.

#53

DSB
26/05/11, 5:50 pm

I fail to see any kind of point in the babble you just posted Hybrid Psycho, except for the fact that I suck – Or something. Which is great.

I was being pretty specific, and those elements are easily verified by anyone who cares to play those games. What you choose to prefer is none of my business, I was simply offering my personal view to StolenGlory, as for why Black Ops has managed to lose a very large part of its players to MW2 after an otherwise impressive launch.

In my case it’s because Black Ops is more of a conventional shooter, whereas MW2 is geared towards being competitive.

#54

M. K.
26/05/11, 5:53 pm

@47: Why the hell should I? I just look at the sales and see that on every guy who flames against CoD there are atleast another 100 who love and buy it :D

#55

G1GAHURTZ
26/05/11, 5:58 pm

@47:

You have no point, because the sales figures prove you wrong.

If “more and more” people were hating the game, it wouldn’t keep breaking all the sales records.

Indeed, the opposite is true.

More and more people are coming to the game and more and more people are buying it each year.

It’s just people with petty grudges, like elitist PC gamers, who feel the need to hate on the entire franchise because of a lack of dedicated servers in a 2 year old game.

Don’t forget the people with inferiority complexes who just hate the popular choice because they can’t handle the fact that people that they loathe for some entirely irrational reason are really happy when they play the game.

The fact that the vocal minority might be constatnly speaking out, has no bearing on what the majority are feeling.

#56

Dralen
26/05/11, 6:08 pm

Fair enough guys, you have your opinion I have mine. But I would bet money that this franchise will not last. Just like Guitar Hero. Also sales figures mean nothing in this day and age, there’s plenty of average/poor games and film’s out there with huge box office numbers.

#57

Gekidami
26/05/11, 6:08 pm

@51
You know whats really funny about that?; Its actually a lot closer to the plot of Bad Company 2 than any CoD game.

#58

G1GAHURTZ
26/05/11, 6:08 pm

Fact: Acti believe that they have a winning formula.

They will not ‘innovate’ a single bit until they feel the need, and they almost certainly won’t feel the need until sales start to decline.

They’re a business at the end of the day.

Just like Coca Cola, KFC and whatever else have had the exact same recipe for years, so will Acti continue with the same engine and the same gameplay until sales start to become a negative issue.

At that point, they’ll probably try to innovate, and if that fails, they’ll just drop the CoD brand and go for something else.

That much is clear from their past actions.

This article points out that competition helps to make games better for the gamers, but I don’t see BF doing that, because they’ve been trying for years and not really come close.

I reckon that Respawn Entertainment are the only devs with a real chance of killing CoD off.

If they come out with a new engine and the classic CoD4 gameplay, I’m sure we’ll see a new FPS king.

#59

M. K.
26/05/11, 6:13 pm

@56: It’s not about your opinion. It’s fact: Hate it or love it, the sales are exploding :)

#60

xino
26/05/11, 6:15 pm

7/7

#61

DSB
26/05/11, 6:17 pm

I still reckon that CoD will have to reboot at some point. No matter how solid your gameplay or your brand is, you’re going to have to upgrade somewhere down the line.

My guess is Sledgehammers own title is going to give them the room they need to implement a new engine.

#62

Dralen
26/05/11, 6:22 pm

More and more people buy it so more and more people hate it, exactly, my theory is proven :P .

#63

Fin
26/05/11, 6:55 pm

Jesus would you all just shut up, nobody cares about the CoD/BF pissing match.
Both games have people who enjoy them, both games have people who hate them, both games are going to have high sales, deal with it.

STFU

#64

Bloodyghost
26/05/11, 8:06 pm

Call of Duty.

The Copy Pasta game franchise that still wows many of us rational gamers as it sells more then the better games of the year.

When will kids, MLG “PROFESSIONALS”, and immature teens learn.

#65

M. K.
26/05/11, 9:39 pm

`more then the better games of the year.`

Oh yeah? Tell me only one shooter that had better Gameplay/Performance over the past four/five years?

ps: It’s a rhetorical question ;)

#66

manamana
26/05/11, 9:52 pm

If anyone is a prototype CoD player, than its gotta be jaieazy: hilarious fun for real!

#67

M. K.
26/05/11, 10:01 pm

I kinda like this guy :D

#68

DSB
26/05/11, 11:19 pm

@64 So somehow deciding that everybody playing a certain game have to be kids and immature teens, based on the fact that you don’t prefer said game – Isn’t childish?

Haaaaah. Okay!

@66 I can’t decide whether I love that, or prefer the European way (total eerie microphone silence)

#69

ZephyrWarrior
26/05/11, 11:43 pm

“inevitably be the biggest game of the year”, bs, Battlefield 3′s gonna own MW3, end of story.

#70

manamana
27/05/11, 6:54 am

@DSB The European way is more pleasing, while I find jaieazy’s version much more entertaining! At times that is.

#71

polygem
27/05/11, 9:05 am

@52. same here. bfbc2 and reach are the top mp fps this gen on consoles so far – annnnd cod 4. i play cod4 right now and i really enjoy it (again). played all the cod´s and enjoyed them all. cod4 is my mp cod hero – it just has the very best maps imo and is balanced well. i enjoyed the hell out of blops as well. mw2 was kind of broken imo (killstreaks, shotty problem etc) but still a good game – didn´t keep me hooked for long though…..i believe bf and reach are the much better, much more thought out games though.but i need that more fast paced, arcadish cod gameplay as well from time to time – it´s very challenging for competitive play and i love it. the gameplay is superb – it´s just cod. to me this is videogame history. good gaming memories. nothing bad to say about cod at all. it´s repeating over and over but i like what´s repeating there a lot. i´m a shooter lover. i will never be able to resist a good shooter – i will most definitely buy both of these two beasts anyway and i can´t wait.

Leave a Reply