Army of Two: The 40th Day reviews round-up

Tuesday, 12th January 2010 18:57 GMT By Stephany Nunneley


Reviews for Army of Two: The 40th Day are starting to go live, so we’ve pulled them into one post for your convenience.

Looks like it’s getting decent scores all around, with the lowest so far being Game Informer.

Given an 8.5 in its first published review, and hailed as “Bad Boys meets 2012″ by IGN, the shooter’s out today in the US and will hit European retail outlets on January 15.

We’ll update the list as more reviews come in, so keep an eye on this space.



  1. AHA-Lambda

    “Bad Boys meets 2012″

    That doesn’t fill me with confidence >_>

    #1 5 years ago
  2. reask

    A 6.5 and a 7 is enough to put me off.
    Didn’t get the first one and will most likely skip this one.
    Too many good games out there atm.

    #2 5 years ago
  3. ianos

    NowGamer 6.5 (PS3) and 7.0 (360)

    The PS3 review is the most accurate one I’ve read so far, even though I am technically supposed to say things like that. Nail>head.

    #3 5 years ago
  4. pontxo (8/10) :

    #4 5 years ago
  5. Lucky 8.4/10

    #5 5 years ago
  6. Psychotext

    Sounds a lot like the first one. Average.

    #6 5 years ago
  7. Doc Robotnik

    Couldn’t even bare to finish the first one. Really didn’t like it. Not that it was an awfully designed game, but it just rubbed me the wrong way.

    I suppose it didn’t help that I’d just finished playing Gears 2 at the time.

    #7 5 years ago
  8. Gekidami

    The first one wasnt average PT, it was alot less.

    #8 5 years ago
  9. Psychotext

    As hardcore gamers we’re not very friendly towards 7/10 rates games Gekidami, but that doesn’t make them shit, just average. It’s not like the game was completely without merit.

    #9 5 years ago


    #10 5 years ago
  11. EGCZ 7/10

    #11 5 years ago
  12. DaMan

    and I ‘m actually getting this one soon.

    #12 5 years ago
  13. McLovin85

    In it’s defense, although the first one was not exactly ground-breaking it was quite fun playing it co-op split screen with a mate (who bought the game). So i can imagine it’s just more of the same.
    From memory the first game came out at a time when there wasn’t much about hence why my friend bought it. As ‘reask’ said though, there are too many good games about to come out so it’s wiser to save ur money for them.

    #13 5 years ago
  14. akrillic

    @Psychotext. A 7/10 is an ‘above average’ score. 5/10 is an ‘average’ score.
    Unfortunatly, the scores listed above are from ‘limp wristed’ reviewers who wouldn’t know a decent game if one came up and bit them on their arse.

    #14 5 years ago
  15. AHA-Lambda

    GT review is up 7.7/10

    #15 5 years ago
  16. Psychotext

    @akrillic: Are you new to games reviewing or something? The scale pretty much goes from 5-10 unless the title is utterly broken.

    Actually… I believe the average review score for a 360 / PS3 game is somewhere around 70%, so this title might be slightly above average even. ;)

    #16 5 years ago
  17. akrillic

    @Psychotext: If that is the case, then why are those games not rated on a 1 out of 5 basis? If a games is truley ‘average’ then the reviewer should give a score that reflects that.

    ‘Edge’ magazine and ‘Teletexts, Gamecentral’ use a far more rational scoring system, where a score of ’5′ means that the game is of average quality and thus the numbers 1-4 are not made redundant.

    Also i suggest that if there is anyone out there who still reads ’1up’ to stop, lest their eyeballs fall out.

    #17 5 years ago
  18. DaMan

    yeah, Edge scores are actually like that.

    #18 5 years ago
  19. Psychotext

    I’m not agreeing with it akrillic, it’s just the way it is.

    #19 5 years ago
  20. The Hindle

    Good to hear someone refrencing Teletext Gamecentral. I dont get Edges reviews personally i mean if you enjoy a game why give it a low score.

    #20 5 years ago
  21. DaMan

    #21 5 years ago

Comments are now closed on this article.