You’ve got an opinion and I’ve got one as well. They do not match, but they are equally subjective and valid. We can always agree to disagree.

I only brought metascores into the argument because it’s a more objective (yet not defining) measurement. It doesn’t invalidate your opinion or your right to have one. What’s the problem?

And since we are on the subject, what’s the point of going back to a game you think is crap?

It’s no game of the year, but I enjoyed it immensely while it lasted.

I wasn’t aware a person’s opinion was meant to be defined by *other* people’s opinions.

I couldn’t give a rats ass what other reviewers of the game thought of it when my own critical observations of Max Payne (and yes, I do go back and try to play it recently) lead me to the observation that it’s a bad game.

Unless Wet’s demo is not representative of the final game, ‘fluid’ is not how I would describe the gameplay, but that’s just my opinion.

What is more objective, however, is how the gaming media reviewed them. The original Max Payne carries a metascore of 89 and the sequel a 86, while Wet only reached 70; hardly sets the gaming world on fire I’m sure you will agree.

Wet’s gameplay is more fluid and well executed, and with a lot of flair. Max Payne didn’t do anything any better than WET does.

Nostalgia is a cruel mistress, but then, I thought Max Payne was shite even back when it originally came out.