Rumor: Survey reveals potential 1 vs. 100 subscription model

Monday, 24th August 2009 23:14 GMT By Nathan Grayson


1 vs. 100 butters its bread by asking all kinds of oddball trivia questions, and now — fittingly enough — Microsoft’s following suit by riddling gamers this big question: “If 1 vs. 100 were not available as part of your Gold Membership account, how likely would you be to purchase 1 vs. 100 for $15 per season (13 weeks)?”

At least, Microsoft’s behind this caper if an anonymous Joystiq tipster is to be believed. The question in question allegedly came from a survey on, though its legitimacy is still suspect.

We’ve sent an email over to Microsoft to find out more. For now, though, this one gets the big, bad rumor tag. Wear it with pride, 1 vs. 100. We don’t use these things lightly.



  1. Psychotext

    Hey Microsoft… charge for it and as far as I’m concerned you can stick it up your arse. Sideways.

    Make gold worth something with things like this, and make the money you want on it using advertising.

    #1 5 years ago
  2. Whizzo

    Olivia : Next question.

    If Microsoft starts charging for 1 vs 100 what will happen to it?

    (x) Crash (a) Burn (b) Crash & Burn

    Instant answer!


    Olivia : The answer is…. b!

    #2 5 years ago
  3. SunKing

    It’s free now and I’ve hardly touched it since the beta launched. You know why? It’s not worth more than that.

    #3 5 years ago
  4. Psychotext

    “They’re not all this easy”

    #4 5 years ago
  5. DarkElfa

    Microsoft, you nickel and dime cheap asses, I’m with psycho, charge for it and you can suck a dick.

    #5 5 years ago
  6. Progguitarist

    They’ve started charging for avatar clothing…why not this?

    #6 5 years ago

Comments are now closed on this article.