<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubisoft &#8211; World in Conflict: Soviet Assault no longer coming to consoles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2009/03/04/ubisoft-world-in-conflict-no-longer-coming-to-consoles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2009/03/04/ubisoft-world-in-conflict-no-longer-coming-to-consoles/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainer</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2009/03/04/ubisoft-world-in-conflict-no-longer-coming-to-consoles/comment-page-1/#comment-55296</link>
		<dc:creator>rainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vg247.com/?p=23301#comment-55296</guid>
		<description>Yeah weird, WiC without its base building and only units fighting seems much more ideal than other RTS games even the camera controls WiC uses would map well enough to a gamepad.

Though the console release would have been the full WiC + the soviet assault expansion maybe Ubisoft have Massive working on something else now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah weird, WiC without its base building and only units fighting seems much more ideal than other RTS games even the camera controls WiC uses would map well enough to a gamepad.</p>
<p>Though the console release would have been the full WiC + the soviet assault expansion maybe Ubisoft have Massive working on something else now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

