Microsoft’s given a less than subtle hint that a sequel to Realtime World’s beloved open-city 360 shooter, Crackdown, is a little more than fantasy.
“I’m here to tell you on behalf of the community, I want – we need – another Crackdown,” Xbox Live’s director of programming, Larry Hryb, told MGS boss Phil Spencer in the latest Major Nelson podcast.
“That’s all I’m going to say, so you don’t have to confirm for deny anything. I’m just saying we want it.”
“Yes, Crackdown’s one of my favourites,” said Spencer. “I’ll leave it at that.”
A sequel to Crackdown never materialized as “the numbers just didn’t add up,” we were told by Realtime Worlds studio boss Colin Macdonald told us this summer.
Macdonald himself said at the time that the studio was open to negotiations on a second game.
“I don’t think the door’s closed,” he said. “Obviously, right now we’re tied up with APB and everything else, but hopefully in the future we’ll have the resource and something can be worked out with Microsoft.”
Crackdown, a first-party Microsoft game, shipped in February 2007 to general critical acclaim.







morriss said:
Finally, now announce it and get on with it.
evilashchris said:
Oh gosh yes, the original sold me my 360 after an hour on it in a friends house.
Truk said:
First-party? MS don’t own RTW do they? Do you mean second-party?
/splitting hairs
The first one of these games is on my reasons-to-buy-a-360 list, so adding another reason would be good for me.
Blerk said:
What about fixing the original to work with HDD install while we’re waiting?
patlike said:
“First-party” just means it was published by Microsoft. RTW is an independent, you’re right.
No_PUDding said:
And that is where the term 2nd party comes in. Especially since I don’t think that Microsoft own the IP, jusdging by what the Real Time Worlds man said.
And isn’t APB miles off yet? If Crackdown 2 is comng it’s not next year.
Withnail said:
First party means it was developed and published by the platform holder.
Second party means the development was carried out by a separate company funded by the platform holder, who publish the game and usually own the IP. Crackdown, Gears, Resistance, these fall into this category.
Third party means the platform holder had no involvement in either development or publishing.
Blerk said:
There have been rumblings about Take Two buying RTW and turning APB into GTA Online. That’d probably scupper any Crackdown 2 deal in the process, so Microsoft had better get their arses in gear just in case.
No_PUDding said:
Thanks Withnail…….
I certainly didn’t need to be condescended all over.
deftangel said:
Crackdown was awesome but being stuck on 499 orbs broke my heart!
GordonR said:
@Blerk
That’s old news – six months ago, or more. It’s not happening.
No_PUDding said:
It was good from what I played.
But it still had problems a sequel could sort out.
onyxbox said:
I loved Crackdown… it was a real surprise hit for me.
Gamoc said:
Oh God, now I’m gonna have to get a 360. Damn you VG247!
[Is secretly happy]
Truk said:
Nevermind. Everyone else already said it.
Blerk said:
I know it’s an old rumour, Gordon, but I’ve specifically heard it mentioned again in the last few weeks in a couple of places. Which is why I brought it up.
mightyhokie said:
The numbers were less than stellar because the game was pushed as ‘a wrapper for the Halo 3 demo’. It was far from shovelware for sure. I really, really liked it. I think that since it’s release the buzz was ‘man this game is really cool’, sort of like Family Guy getting canceled (although the show has jumped the shark this year imho).
I feel sure that a sequel will outsell the first one. I’ll get it, at least.
Gamoc said:
I’ll get a 360 for it.