<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ghostbusters officially goes to Atari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:31:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/comment-page-1/#comment-37880</link>
		<dc:creator>morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/#comment-37880</guid>
		<description>PS3 is the lead dev platform if that sort of thing warms your cockles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS3 is the lead dev platform if that sort of thing warms your cockles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/comment-page-1/#comment-37879</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/#comment-37879</guid>
		<description>The game&#039;s already just about done. It&#039;s a bit late in the day to switch it to another developer. Atari are only publishing it, they&#039;re not actually creating it.

As to why Sony Pictures don&#039;t keep all their best licenses to themselves, you&#039;d have to ask Sony Pictures. Bond could well be a Sony-exclusive too, remember. I guess they just like maximum money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game&#8217;s already just about done. It&#8217;s a bit late in the day to switch it to another developer. Atari are only publishing it, they&#8217;re not actually creating it.</p>
<p>As to why Sony Pictures don&#8217;t keep all their best licenses to themselves, you&#8217;d have to ask Sony Pictures. Bond could well be a Sony-exclusive too, remember. I guess they just like maximum money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cort</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/comment-page-1/#comment-37877</link>
		<dc:creator>Cort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/#comment-37877</guid>
		<description>Sony owns this IP.  Why on earth didn&#039;t they hand it to one of their studios?  They could then guarentee it isn&#039;t gimped by lazy developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony owns this IP.  Why on earth didn&#8217;t they hand it to one of their studios?  They could then guarentee it isn&#8217;t gimped by lazy developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/comment-page-1/#comment-37790</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/11/07/ghostbusters-officially-goes-to-atari/#comment-37790</guid>
		<description>Last time Phil said something was &#039;fantastic&#039; it turned out to be Alone in the Dark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time Phil said something was &#8216;fantastic&#8217; it turned out to be Alone in the Dark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

