<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acti-Blizz Q3 financials &#8211; Sequel-centric strategy has &#8220;worked very well,&#8221; says Kotick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:17:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/comment-page-1/#comment-37562</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/#comment-37562</guid>
		<description>Accordion Hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accordion Hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjmaybe</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/comment-page-1/#comment-37558</link>
		<dc:creator>pjmaybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/#comment-37558</guid>
		<description>Hmm. I wonder how long they can maintain a strategy like that for. Sure, people seem to buy any old bollocks with a GH subtitle on it at the moment, and people are loving COD4 and COD5 but resting on your laurels is a very dangerous strategy in the games industry and people are as fickle as hell. 

I can&#039;t see where there is left to go with GH. COD could do with at least one more sublime modern-theatre combat game (a proper sequel to COD4) but Activision really seem to be full of themselves at the moment and there&#039;s a twisted cynical old bastard that&#039;d like to see &#039;em fall flat on their faces next fiscal year :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. I wonder how long they can maintain a strategy like that for. Sure, people seem to buy any old bollocks with a GH subtitle on it at the moment, and people are loving COD4 and COD5 but resting on your laurels is a very dangerous strategy in the games industry and people are as fickle as hell. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see where there is left to go with GH. COD could do with at least one more sublime modern-theatre combat game (a proper sequel to COD4) but Activision really seem to be full of themselves at the moment and there&#8217;s a twisted cynical old bastard that&#8217;d like to see &#8216;em fall flat on their faces next fiscal year <img src='http://www.vg247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MesserWolf</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/comment-page-1/#comment-37555</link>
		<dc:creator>MesserWolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/11/06/acti-blizz-q3-financials-sequel-centric-strategy-has-worked-very-well-says-kotick/#comment-37555</guid>
		<description>perhaps too well . I would be nice to move on sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps too well . I would be nice to move on sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
