Fri, Oct 17, 2008 | 14:00 BST
Edge gives LBP 10
The latest issue of Edge has hit subs, and the main event is a LittleBigPlanet review with a 10/10 score.
Fable II also did well in the mag, taking 9/10. The rest are below. Thanks, NeoGAF.
- LittleBigPlanet [10]
- Fable II [9]
- Far Cry 2 [8]
- Dead Space [8]
- Rock Band 2 [9]
- Midnight Club: Los Angeles [7]
- Motorstorm: Pacific Rift [7]
- Lego Batman [4]
- Fracture [4]
- Saints Row 2 [5]
- Wipeout HD [8]
- Baja : Edge of Control [5]
- Mega Man 9 [6]
- Captain Rainbow [7]
- Flower, Sun and Rain [4]
- Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood [6]
- Disgaea 3 [8]
- Tales of Vesperia [8]
- Legendary [4]
- World of Goo [8]
- Trackmania DS [8]
- Line Rider 2 [5]



9 comments
#1
Psychotext
17/10/08, 2:04 pm
Go LBP & Fable! \o/
Up yours Saints Row 2!
#2
Blerk
17/10/08, 2:13 pm
Some great scores, some great games. I’m super-looking forward to actually being able to play some of these.
#3
Shatner
17/10/08, 2:13 pm
Braid got a 9.
Hey morriss! LBP > Braid
Good stuff for Fable. Quite surprised by Dead Space. That game must have done a lot right to please the Edge snobs.
#4
DrDamn
17/10/08, 2:28 pm
LBP actually got a 9.7 from EG too … if you take into account the EG.de and EG.pt scores
#5
MesserWolf
17/10/08, 2:28 pm
Way to go LBP ! I’m also interested in FarCry2 , but I’ve already Resistence2 to buy …
#6
deftangel
17/10/08, 2:47 pm
A well written review IMO. They do mention the controls / 3 planes of movement “issue” but deem that it insignificant in the face of everything else on offer. I’m inclined to agree.
#7
Smartypants
17/10/08, 3:27 pm
Well deserved score from LBP, and a stupid amount of good games coming out this month. MY WALLET AM CRY
#8
Axle
17/10/08, 5:01 pm
Nice to see that Edge haven’t left their innate bias against SR at the altar of incredulous VG reviews . . .
They get it right most of the time, but sometimes they get it VERY wrong. Does anyone remember the original review for GTA III where it got a 6 and then the following month was revised upwards for a ‘typographical error’?
Classic revisionism.
#9
ecu
17/10/08, 5:45 pm
Hi morriss.