Comments on: Move on Take-Two was “waste of ink,” says Riccitiello http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/ VG247.com Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:43:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: st00rm http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/comment-page-1/#comment-33249 st00rm Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:52:33 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/#comment-33249 he has his own story everybody else knows the truth :) he has his own story everybody else knows the truth :)

]]> By: Tiger Walts http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/comment-page-1/#comment-33152 Tiger Walts Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:56:12 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/#comment-33152 "Charitable effort" implies that Take-Two were needy, which wasn't exactly the case at the time. If anything, EA probably realised that aquiring them after GTAIV would have cost them more in the immediate short term which didn't justify the long term gains they expected. They blatantly wanted to make a quick buck and dissolve Take-Two for its studio and IP assets. “Charitable effort” implies that Take-Two were needy, which wasn’t exactly the case at the time.

If anything, EA probably realised that aquiring them after GTAIV would have cost them more in the immediate short term which didn’t justify the long term gains they expected.

They blatantly wanted to make a quick buck and dissolve Take-Two for its studio and IP assets.

]]> By: pleasant_cabbage http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/comment-page-1/#comment-33144 pleasant_cabbage Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:34:09 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/#comment-33144 I thought there was a bit of Biggins in him too (fnar) but B'stard is also a good call. Rob is the most right. I thought there was a bit of Biggins in him too (fnar) but B’stard is also a good call. Rob is the most right.

]]> By: Robo_1 http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/comment-page-1/#comment-33142 Robo_1 Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:28:56 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/#comment-33142 Worryingly enough, you're both right : / Worryingly enough, you’re both right : /

]]> By: Blerk http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/comment-page-1/#comment-33139 Blerk Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:23:27 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/#comment-33139 Christopher Biggins. Christopher Biggins.

]]> By: that_happy_cat http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/comment-page-1/#comment-33137 that_happy_cat Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:18:18 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/15/move-on-take-two-was-waste-of-ink-says-riccitiello/#comment-33137 Alan B'Stard? Alan B’Stard?

]]>