<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New PoP movie shows proper gameplay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/</link>
	<description>This is the news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:49:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dQuarters</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/comment-page-1/#comment-31863</link>
		<dc:creator>dQuarters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/#comment-31863</guid>
		<description>This game looks great, and seems to be a ballsy new direction for the franchise, while staying perfectly true to what was fun about the Sands trilogy, AND the original.

Some people are understandably bummed that this doesn&#039;t follow the same storyline, but it&#039;s not as though you can&#039;t go back and play those games you really love. And a new chapter there wouldn&#039;t make the older games any better either. They are what they are, and I appreciate that is how they will be left.
It&#039;s about time a game series doesn&#039;t rely on a main character or anything super obvious and familiar to sell it&#039;s next installment. And frankly, I feel it&#039;s a great show of respect to the previous 3: &#039;That trilogy is done. Hope you enjoyed it, but we&#039;re moving on to not choke every drop out of it until it is laughable&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This game looks great, and seems to be a ballsy new direction for the franchise, while staying perfectly true to what was fun about the Sands trilogy, AND the original.</p>
<p>Some people are understandably bummed that this doesn&#8217;t follow the same storyline, but it&#8217;s not as though you can&#8217;t go back and play those games you really love. And a new chapter there wouldn&#8217;t make the older games any better either. They are what they are, and I appreciate that is how they will be left.<br />
It&#8217;s about time a game series doesn&#8217;t rely on a main character or anything super obvious and familiar to sell it&#8217;s next installment. And frankly, I feel it&#8217;s a great show of respect to the previous 3: &#8216;That trilogy is done. Hope you enjoyed it, but we&#8217;re moving on to not choke every drop out of it until it is laughable&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esha</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/comment-page-1/#comment-31775</link>
		<dc:creator>Esha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/#comment-31775</guid>
		<description>Once again the contrarian, and not by &lt;i&gt;choice&lt;/i&gt; Gods damn it.  And by that I mean that I&#039;ve liked this game since I saw it, I&#039;m not adopting the opposite opinion just for the hell of it here.

I actually like the look of this, and there&#039;s one thing that strikes me right away.  First though, I&#039;d like to say that the commonality of the hardcore supports the idea that this is moving further away from the core of what Prince of Persia is and how that&#039;s a bad thing.  What I see here though is that if they hadn&#039;t used the Prince of Persia IP, people might be able to see what&#039;s neat about this game.

The AI system intrigues me, and it seems to work so much better than it did in Sands of Time.  It&#039;s a very fluid thing and it has this Sonic &amp; Tails inertia to it that Sonic 3 did.  Don&#039;t ask me how I saw that, again... I&#039;m just operating on my impressions, here.  It&#039;s not often that a player gets one constant and really helpful AI companion.  And thank goodness that companion seems independent so we don&#039;t have to cart her heiney throughout the levels.

The battles look like fun, the architecture is beautiful, it has a great art style - and one that isn&#039;t a joke and doesn&#039;t feature grossly over-sized weapons and armour, the whole Claw thing is new and interesting, and generally it looks like a breath of fresh air.  I can&#039;t wait to play it, and unlike Yahtzee I am unafraid of Teh Gehy that it might represent.

I don&#039;t know why I end up with such opposite opinions, but this is a title I&#039;m really looking forward to.  It just looks... &lt;i&gt;fun&lt;/i&gt;?  Sort of in the way that Mirror&#039;s Edge just looks shamelessly fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again the contrarian, and not by <i>choice</i> Gods damn it.  And by that I mean that I&#8217;ve liked this game since I saw it, I&#8217;m not adopting the opposite opinion just for the hell of it here.</p>
<p>I actually like the look of this, and there&#8217;s one thing that strikes me right away.  First though, I&#8217;d like to say that the commonality of the hardcore supports the idea that this is moving further away from the core of what Prince of Persia is and how that&#8217;s a bad thing.  What I see here though is that if they hadn&#8217;t used the Prince of Persia IP, people might be able to see what&#8217;s neat about this game.</p>
<p>The AI system intrigues me, and it seems to work so much better than it did in Sands of Time.  It&#8217;s a very fluid thing and it has this Sonic &amp; Tails inertia to it that Sonic 3 did.  Don&#8217;t ask me how I saw that, again&#8230; I&#8217;m just operating on my impressions, here.  It&#8217;s not often that a player gets one constant and really helpful AI companion.  And thank goodness that companion seems independent so we don&#8217;t have to cart her heiney throughout the levels.</p>
<p>The battles look like fun, the architecture is beautiful, it has a great art style &#8211; and one that isn&#8217;t a joke and doesn&#8217;t feature grossly over-sized weapons and armour, the whole Claw thing is new and interesting, and generally it looks like a breath of fresh air.  I can&#8217;t wait to play it, and unlike Yahtzee I am unafraid of Teh Gehy that it might represent.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why I end up with such opposite opinions, but this is a title I&#8217;m really looking forward to.  It just looks&#8230; <i>fun</i>?  Sort of in the way that Mirror&#8217;s Edge just looks shamelessly fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El_MUERkO</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/comment-page-1/#comment-31742</link>
		<dc:creator>El_MUERkO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/#comment-31742</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not liking it, with every change since sands of time PoP seems to have got further from the point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not liking it, with every change since sands of time PoP seems to have got further from the point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrok</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/comment-page-1/#comment-31734</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/#comment-31734</guid>
		<description>I was thinking more of the original Prince of Persia and The Shadow and the Flame&quot; (I think that what it was called) So more human jump and run style instead of magical, flying around, kicking huge monsters style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking more of the original Prince of Persia and The Shadow and the Flame&#8221; (I think that what it was called) So more human jump and run style instead of magical, flying around, kicking huge monsters style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/comment-page-1/#comment-31731</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/#comment-31731</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather they didn&#039;t. It was great, but they need to move on because they were gradually getting worse rather than better. Looking forward to trying something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather they didn&#8217;t. It was great, but they need to move on because they were gradually getting worse rather than better. Looking forward to trying something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrok</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/comment-page-1/#comment-31727</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/08/new-pop-movie-shows-proper-gameplay/#comment-31727</guid>
		<description>Right this might or might not be fun, but could the series please return to original concept in the next instalment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right this might or might not be fun, but could the series please return to original concept in the next instalment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
