Comments on: Far Cry 2: 720p, but no 60 frames a second http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/ VG247.com Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:57:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: XDamage http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31227 XDamage Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:07:23 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31227 Absolutely a title to look forward to, pre-ordered and ready. What do you get when you mix Rambo with Blood Diamond? Far Cry 2! :D Absolutely a title to look forward to, pre-ordered and ready. What do you get when you mix Rambo with Blood Diamond? Far Cry 2! :D

]]> By: dirigiblebill http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31226 dirigiblebill Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:00:13 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31226 You can bally well go read my multiplayer preview on Kikizo, Esha, instead of bloody eavesdropping ;) http://games.kikizo.com/features/far-cry-2-multiplayer-p1.asp The setting is great, yeah - refreshingly mature after the bollox that was Mercenaries 2. You can bally well go read my multiplayer preview on Kikizo, Esha, instead of bloody eavesdropping ;)

http://games.kikizo.com/features/far-cry-2-multiplayer-p1.asp

The setting is great, yeah – refreshingly mature after the bollox that was Mercenaries 2.

]]> By: patlike http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31223 patlike Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:39:22 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31223 I really enjoyed it, yeah. The single-player especially. The whole African setting appeals to me very much. I only played the multiplayer stuff for about half an hour, but it's just so solid. I didn't see the map editor, either. Pretty pumped about the whole thing, to be honest. Esha - I've got plenty more from the interview to post this week. I really enjoyed it, yeah. The single-player especially. The whole African setting appeals to me very much. I only played the multiplayer stuff for about half an hour, but it’s just so solid. I didn’t see the map editor, either. Pretty pumped about the whole thing, to be honest.

Esha – I’ve got plenty more from the interview to post this week.

]]> By: Esha http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31221 Esha Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:33:31 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31221 I'll watch this conversation with interest, you two seem like you have a lot of good information to spill about the game. Still, I have to say... The <i>grass</i> can catch on fire? The <i>grass</i>?! Good grief. I wonder just how well even the PS3 is going to take that. But I really want to see that. I’ll watch this conversation with interest, you two seem like you have a lot of good information to spill about the game.

Still, I have to say…

The grass can catch on fire?

The grass?!

Good grief.

I wonder just how well even the PS3 is going to take that. But I really want to see that.

]]> By: dirigiblebill http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31205 dirigiblebill Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:25:13 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31205 I thought it was very impressive in terms of the nitty-gritty - the weapons balancing, two-tiered experience system, healing, the effects of fire and changing light levels - and if the overarching mode structure is a little minimalist the map editor should offer plenty of longevity. What about you? I thought it was very impressive in terms of the nitty-gritty – the weapons balancing, two-tiered experience system, healing, the effects of fire and changing light levels – and if the overarching mode structure is a little minimalist the map editor should offer plenty of longevity. What about you?

]]> By: patlike http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31183 patlike Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:02:12 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31183 Heh. I was doing a similar thing. What did you think of it? Heh. I was doing a similar thing. What did you think of it?

]]> By: dirigiblebill http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31180 dirigiblebill Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:49:08 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31180 Possibly not - I did a runner around 2-ish. If you recall somebody shouting "f**k" and committing grenade launcher suicide a lot, that was me :) Possibly not – I did a runner around 2-ish.

If you recall somebody shouting “f**k” and committing grenade launcher suicide a lot, that was me :)

]]> By: patlike http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31177 patlike Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:37:28 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31177 Were we there at the same time? I was about for an hour in the afternoon session. Were we there at the same time? I was about for an hour in the afternoon session.

]]> By: dirigiblebill http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31175 dirigiblebill Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:30:45 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31175 I interviewed him on the same day I think, and it's really starting to depress me how much better everybody else's questions were :( Mine were so abysmal I ended up hiding the answers in the depths of a hands-on. Something like this should have been a no-brainer. /shakes fist I interviewed him on the same day I think, and it’s really starting to depress me how much better everybody else’s questions were :( Mine were so abysmal I ended up hiding the answers in the depths of a hands-on.

Something like this should have been a no-brainer.

/shakes fist

]]> By: Psychotext http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31167 Psychotext Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:10:23 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31167 As long as it's a solid 30fps it shouldn't really matter. As long as it’s a solid 30fps it shouldn’t really matter.

]]> By: patlike http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31165 patlike Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:00:27 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31165 I didn't ask him, and I have no idea why. To be honest, I couldn't tell it was doing less than full whack. It looks amazing. I didn’t ask him, and I have no idea why. To be honest, I couldn’t tell it was doing less than full whack. It looks amazing.

]]> By: Blerk http://www.vg247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/comment-page-1/#comment-31163 Blerk Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:58:48 +0000 http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/10/06/far-cry-2-720p-but-no-60-frames-a-second/#comment-31163 What fps <i>is</i> it doing, then? :-D What fps is it doing, then? :-D

]]>