<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Molyneux: &#8220;Ambition&#8221; is for day one Fable II co-op patch, better than game delay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:45:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No_PUDding</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30339</link>
		<dc:creator>No_PUDding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30339</guid>
		<description>JPickford, online Coop on LBP is in. Just nto onlien multiplayer creation.

And you&#039;ll find your eally don&#039;t need to be speakign to them all the time, you want to create your own level.

Stickers and decorations are still available in playthroguhs and that&#039;s all you need.

And This is a big fuss over nothing anyway, Fable 2&#039;s online co-op is not what is making me want it. I don&#039;t like the orbs. The game sounds fun and local coop is MUCH better than online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JPickford, online Coop on LBP is in. Just nto onlien multiplayer creation.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;ll find your eally don&#8217;t need to be speakign to them all the time, you want to create your own level.</p>
<p>Stickers and decorations are still available in playthroguhs and that&#8217;s all you need.</p>
<p>And This is a big fuss over nothing anyway, Fable 2&#8242;s online co-op is not what is making me want it. I don&#8217;t like the orbs. The game sounds fun and local coop is MUCH better than online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mightyhokie</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30338</link>
		<dc:creator>mightyhokie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30338</guid>
		<description>Gives me time to do the single player game first! (Always look on the bright side of life.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gives me time to do the single player game first! (Always look on the bright side of life.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BraveArse</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30280</link>
		<dc:creator>BraveArse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30280</guid>
		<description>I suspect Marketing departments have a sizeable hand in it. Sell it now - deliver it later - to hell with what the folk who actually have to build it say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect Marketing departments have a sizeable hand in it. Sell it now &#8211; deliver it later &#8211; to hell with what the folk who actually have to build it say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robo_1</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30248</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo_1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30248</guid>
		<description>I suppose the most likely scenario is they encountered bugs at the last minute, and rather than push the whole game back, decided to patch the online side of things later on.

Either that or feature creep got to them (which doesn&#039;t sound too unlikely given the amount of new features they talk about) and decided to worry about updating the co-op side of things after the offline side was done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the most likely scenario is they encountered bugs at the last minute, and rather than push the whole game back, decided to patch the online side of things later on.</p>
<p>Either that or feature creep got to them (which doesn&#8217;t sound too unlikely given the amount of new features they talk about) and decided to worry about updating the co-op side of things after the offline side was done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPickford</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30246</link>
		<dc:creator>JPickford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30246</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a bit worrying* when core features are being omitted.   Online co-op was certainly a much touted element of LBP.  It&#039;s hard to understand why they left it to the last minute.

*I&#039;m not actually worried or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a bit worrying* when core features are being omitted.   Online co-op was certainly a much touted element of LBP.  It&#8217;s hard to understand why they left it to the last minute.</p>
<p>*I&#8217;m not actually worried or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robo_1</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30245</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo_1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30245</guid>
		<description>I think Peter Moore recently said that yearly titles like Fifa could switch to a download like service, which is certainly in line with that sort of thinking.

Day one patches are becoming increasingly common though, Little Big Planet is also getting a day one patch for online co-op, I suppose it&#039;s a good thing if it gives developers a bit more breathing room, but it&#039;s increasingly becoming the norm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Peter Moore recently said that yearly titles like Fifa could switch to a download like service, which is certainly in line with that sort of thinking.</p>
<p>Day one patches are becoming increasingly common though, Little Big Planet is also getting a day one patch for online co-op, I suppose it&#8217;s a good thing if it gives developers a bit more breathing room, but it&#8217;s increasingly becoming the norm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPickford</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30242</link>
		<dc:creator>JPickford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30242</guid>
		<description>It&#039;ll happen I reckon.  Probably viable for a big name developer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll happen I reckon.  Probably viable for a big name developer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robo_1</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30240</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo_1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30240</guid>
		<description>I hope nobody from EA read that :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope nobody from EA read that <img src='http://www.vg247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPickford</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/comment-page-1/#comment-30237</link>
		<dc:creator>JPickford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/30/molyneux-ambition-is-for-day-one-fable-ii-co-op-patch-better-than-game-delay/#comment-30237</guid>
		<description>Maybe next time we can buy a blank disk when the game is announced and just keep patching it during the dev process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe next time we can buy a blank disk when the game is announced and just keep patching it during the dev process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

