Over at Kotaku. This is the only thing new we’ve seen on this in a while. Still, if you’re hungry for more, click here and fill your boots… or should that be Vans?
By Mike Bowden
Over at Kotaku. This is the only thing new we’ve seen on this in a while. Still, if you’re hungry for more, click here and fill your boots… or should that be Vans?
By Mike Bowden
Syrok said:
/wants
David said:
/want +1
Rhythm said:
Vans? How 90’s of you
Gamoc said:
Really want this game, I hope they don’t screw the PS3 version as much as they did with the first.
morriss said:
@Rhy:
Syrok said:
@Gamoc: Did they? I can’t remember anything being wrong with it, apart from the online part.
Gamoc said:
Well, I had it, but it slowed down a bit in places and I noticed a lot of graphical glitches, whereas the 360 version had neither that I’d noticed. It’s a bit of a problem to have frame rate problem in a game that’s based on timing, really – it didn’t stop be from enjoying the game whilst I had it, but it dampened it slightly everytime my face said hi to the floor through no fault of my own.
Syrok said:
Oh yea, the slow down. That only really appeared when you played it in 1080p, didn’t it.
Anyway, I agree that it wasn’t a perfect game from the technical point of view but it was still very enjoyable and since I haven’t played it on the 360 I can’t really argue which one was better.
Gamoc said:
I never played it in 1080p, I don’t even own a 1080p TV, so…
Syrok said:
Oh well, maybe it’s just me then.