<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars to be M-rated, cell shaded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28615</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 07:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28615</guid>
		<description>Oh dear - are those &quot;hotwiring a car&quot; and &quot;throwing out the rubbish&quot; mini-games I see?

I wonder how far out the camera pulls? Biggest issue with the old GTAs these days is not being able to see far enough in the distance to drive properly at speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear &#8211; are those &#8220;hotwiring a car&#8221; and &#8220;throwing out the rubbish&#8221; mini-games I see?</p>
<p>I wonder how far out the camera pulls? Biggest issue with the old GTAs these days is not being able to see far enough in the distance to drive properly at speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mortiferus</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28606</link>
		<dc:creator>mortiferus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28606</guid>
		<description>Much better scans.. I gotta admit it looks pretty damn good!

http://www.nintendoeverything.com/?p=3857</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better scans.. I gotta admit it looks pretty damn good!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nintendoeverything.com/?p=3857" rel="nofollow">http://www.nintendoeverything.com/?p=3857</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecu</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28386</link>
		<dc:creator>ecu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28386</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You aren’t one of the biggest GTA fans if you haven’t played them all.&lt;/i&gt;

And I have, that was my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You aren’t one of the biggest GTA fans if you haven’t played them all.</i></p>
<p>And I have, that was my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No_PUDding</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28384</link>
		<dc:creator>No_PUDding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28384</guid>
		<description>Anyway I actually came to post these scans (how allowed is that?).

They reek of milk. 


http://www.gamekyo.com/news29038_grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-first-screens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway I actually came to post these scans (how allowed is that?).</p>
<p>They reek of milk. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.gamekyo.com/news29038_grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-first-screens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamekyo.com/news29038_grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-first-screens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No_PUDding</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28382</link>
		<dc:creator>No_PUDding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28382</guid>
		<description>You aren&#039;t one of the biggest GTA fans if you haven&#039;t played them all.

I have had GTA since 1998. Tea stains and all. Only one I didn&#039;t &#039;complete&#039; (2D ones were arcadey with less story) was London 1961, becuase it was on the PC.

GTA2 was great and GTAIII was better. Downhill from there.

GTAIV was seriously toned and constrictive. Something the GTA series is famous for doing the opposite of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You aren&#8217;t one of the biggest GTA fans if you haven&#8217;t played them all.</p>
<p>I have had GTA since 1998. Tea stains and all. Only one I didn&#8217;t &#8216;complete&#8217; (2D ones were arcadey with less story) was London 1961, becuase it was on the PC.</p>
<p>GTA2 was great and GTAIII was better. Downhill from there.</p>
<p>GTAIV was seriously toned and constrictive. Something the GTA series is famous for doing the opposite of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecu</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28349</link>
		<dc:creator>ecu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28349</guid>
		<description>Huh? I&#039;m one of the biggest GTA fans around, I&#039;ve played and completed every GTA game, every 3D GTA at 100%, except San Andreas (97.something%). IV was fantastic. It wasn&#039;t a step back at all, but it was a slightly different type of game. Which is probably good, given the amount of people that complained about GTA becoming stale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? I&#8217;m one of the biggest GTA fans around, I&#8217;ve played and completed every GTA game, every 3D GTA at 100%, except San Andreas (97.something%). IV was fantastic. It wasn&#8217;t a step back at all, but it was a slightly different type of game. Which is probably good, given the amount of people that complained about GTA becoming stale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No_PUDding</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28348</link>
		<dc:creator>No_PUDding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28348</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d only say that if you hadn&#039;t played the others.

This game was truely a step back. But I still commend Rockstar for not just sticking to the same formula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d only say that if you hadn&#8217;t played the others.</p>
<p>This game was truely a step back. But I still commend Rockstar for not just sticking to the same formula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecu</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28347</link>
		<dc:creator>ecu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28347</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;GTAIV despite being a boiling cow pat&lt;/i&gt;

You mean it was great?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>GTAIV despite being a boiling cow pat</i></p>
<p>You mean it was great?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No_PUDding</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28343</link>
		<dc:creator>No_PUDding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28343</guid>
		<description>Blerk, I agree GTAIII was my favoruite in the series becuase of it.

It did have a very understated stylised direction.

And GTAIV despite being a boiling cow pat (sorry pat) also had an excellent art direction, with the whole saturated shadows thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blerk, I agree GTAIII was my favoruite in the series becuase of it.</p>
<p>It did have a very understated stylised direction.</p>
<p>And GTAIV despite being a boiling cow pat (sorry pat) also had an excellent art direction, with the whole saturated shadows thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cookiejar</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28340</link>
		<dc:creator>cookiejar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28340</guid>
		<description>I hope theres a Wii Port!
Id just love to do a hit n run on someones Mii ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope theres a Wii Port!<br />
Id just love to do a hit n run on someones Mii <img src='http://www.vg247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28338</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28338</guid>
		<description>Well, the 2D images in GTA3 et al were almost cel-shaded to begin with. If they did the whole game like those then it wouldn&#039;t really break with the style. And you have to play to a platform&#039;s strengths - you might have noticed that pretty much all 3D games on the DS look like arse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the 2D images in GTA3 et al were almost cel-shaded to begin with. If they did the whole game like those then it wouldn&#8217;t really break with the style. And you have to play to a platform&#8217;s strengths &#8211; you might have noticed that pretty much all 3D games on the DS look like arse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No_PUDding</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28337</link>
		<dc:creator>No_PUDding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28337</guid>
		<description>Completely, but never enough to break from the games style.

I would have expected them atleast keep the same names (not Chinatown) and perhaps stayed with the GTAIII style.

But Cel shaded sounds like this is goign to be GTA Advanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely, but never enough to break from the games style.</p>
<p>I would have expected them atleast keep the same names (not Chinatown) and perhaps stayed with the GTAIII style.</p>
<p>But Cel shaded sounds like this is goign to be GTA Advanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28335</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28335</guid>
		<description>What are you talking about? Why wouldn&#039;t they want to do a DS version? I&#039;m guessing they like money as much as the next man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about? Why wouldn&#8217;t they want to do a DS version? I&#8217;m guessing they like money as much as the next man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No_PUDding</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28323</link>
		<dc:creator>No_PUDding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28323</guid>
		<description>Take 2 must be in a bad way.

To be totally honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take 2 must be in a bad way.</p>
<p>To be totally honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonka</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28309</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28309</guid>
		<description>I had a go at my first sanbox game last night. NMH no less. I know it&#039;s sandbox light but I can see the appeal in the genre.

What I wanted to say is that this sounds interesting. Especially the bit about short burst game play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a go at my first sanbox game last night. NMH no less. I know it&#8217;s sandbox light but I can see the appeal in the genre.</p>
<p>What I wanted to say is that this sounds interesting. Especially the bit about short burst game play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28301</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested. A bit suspicious of the isometric viewpoint, but we&#039;ll see. Then again... I&#039;m getting GTA GBA horror flashbacks now. That was seriously shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested. A bit suspicious of the isometric viewpoint, but we&#8217;ll see. Then again&#8230; I&#8217;m getting GTA GBA horror flashbacks now. That was seriously shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28284</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28284</guid>
		<description>I lost faith in rockstar with the release of GTA 4. Wont be getting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lost faith in rockstar with the release of GTA 4. Wont be getting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiger Walts</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/comment-page-1/#comment-28280</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiger Walts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/09/19/grand-theft-auto-chinatown-wars-to-be-m-rated-cell-shaded/#comment-28280</guid>
		<description>With a list like that it&#039;s gonna sell. Any talk of a PSP game?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a list like that it&#8217;s gonna sell. Any talk of a PSP game?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

