“360 is kicking the PS3s a$$ in the U.S.”

Is that really an objective point? No, it’s not, there’s tons of different perspectives to say that statement is wrong and tons to support it.

Anyway, I am a fucking angel and I am always right.

Fin?

…and I still stand by my point that the only way you can say the 360 is beating the PS3 in the US is by completely ignoring the fact that the 360 has been out a year longer. Compare the 360 / PS3 at the same point after release and the PS3 is ahead.

Thing is he/she wasnt wrong. 360 is kicking the PS3s a$$ in the U.S. and *the PS3* (edited) is never going to catch up by the looks of it. As for the debate, well all three of you should shut the hell up. You aint no angels Pudding and Pyscho so dont act all innocent and trying to make it sound you were proved right in the end when no-one was.

And Revolution, don’t be an a$$ and quit or youll never be able to survive on the internet.

As for VGCHARTZ, I used to use the for the weekly Ps3, Wii and so on data. NEVER again will it have any meaning. The data is so off the mark its almost pretty much just anyone’s guess.

If you can’t admit you’re wrong gracefully then I guess it’s fine if you don’t show your face here again, but I know I can.

No matter. You resorted to insults, then you reacted with anger and now you’re closing your account.

“Revolution Blues, don’t act all high and mighty when you clearly descended to his level. You are the genius here, for proving to me, you do very easily get confused and go back on your points monumentally.”

JESUS F*CKING CHRIST YOU IDIOT. Didn’t I already say that I have descended to his level? You accuse me of doing something I’ve already admitted to, and try to use it as an original attack! Are you a freaking remedial class idiot or something? Stop butting in to cheerlead Psycho, like the trailer park-living, hand-me-down-wearing, anonymous skinny kid at the edge of the gang trying desperately to fit in with the big boys, and missing the target completely. If you read my posts I didn’t go back on a SINGLE point – let alone “monumentally” as you hilariously claim – or prove anything of the sort to you, what I did do is CORRECT BACK TO MY ORIGINAL DATA ONCE TO *CONTINUE* TO SUPPORT A POINT I CONSISTENTLY MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE THREAD, i.e. the PS3 will struggle to catch the 360 in the US, if ever. Clearly, you must never ever have made a mistake doing anything in your life so you won’t know what it’s like to stand up, concede an error and move on…….what’s it like to be always right?

And constantly repeating a claim without once substantiating it makes you look like spoilt little children.

I’m off, closing my account. You are worse than the arrogant crank readers at ThreeSpeech. Someone disagrees with a long-standing member and he throws his toys out the pram and his pathetic hangers-on shout from behind him.

I’ll leave you with a useful tip. Read a post in full, and ensure you actually understand it, BEFORE replying and throwing the accusations out. Will help you look less like a prick.

Ta ta.

Looks like someone is spying on me.

My favorite true statement of all time

I never claimed the game will be bad becuase of the development. I just said it wasn’t inspired; rather tacked-on and that means I have little faith.

Make me eat more pie when it’s hailed X+ on Metacritic.

EDIT: Revolution Blues, don’t act all high and mighty when you clearly descended to his level. You are the genius here, for proving to me, you do very easily get confused and go back on your points monumentally.

Which explains my final sentence last post, genius.

No_PUD: No, that’ll be fine. You can embellish it however you want when the time comes. The time will come.

Deal.

But I will be more than prepared to admit that now. Raise the stakes on my side to make it fair.

EDIT: For someone who said they’d shutup you’re doing an awful job.

Let me just reiterate you can both halt this arguing till Thursday when someone will revive this comment section so either Psycho or I can eat humble pie.

This from the man who said that points about the 360 winning against the PS3 were not relevant to a debate about the 360 winning against the PS3 (perhaps you are confusing being relevant with being right or wrong….which is absurd), and pointing out that the 360 was not winning in the context of the my clearly defined “360 vs. PS3″ battle because the, er, Wii was outselling it. WTF?

Bravo.

Yes, I conceded an error with my data in one post but that did not mean what I was arguing FOR was lost, just my timescale was wrong. And I withdrew it.

Now see what you did? You made me come back and descend to your level. Damn you.

Hey, if I’m right about the PS3 beating the 360 this month maybe we should make it that you have to post in the BK thread saying that vehicles might actually work and you’ll wait until the game is actually released and reviewed to form an opinion.

If it’s the other way, I’ll post saying that perhaps you were right all along and it seems vehicles were tacked on just a few short months ago and that they’re clearly not going to help a stale genre.

Shall we just wait for Thursday? When the 360 beats the PS3. I doubt the rumours and confirmation have much of an effecvt to anyone but the hardcore who read the internet like us.

So I doubt that will affect sales.

August is slow though, but I expect the 360 to beat the PS3.

You can insult me some more if you like though.

And, because you said those things, they must all be 100% true and relevant, right? Listing your points doesn’t increase their validity nor does selectively choosing mine reduce theirs so don’t use the debating methods of a spoilt child.

Now stop being a prick and end the debate. We agree to disagree. No problem. Move on.

What I said: Sales curve, can’t compare 22 months to 34, PS3 outsold 360 in first 22 months on market, PS3 outsold 360 4 out of 6 months this year. PS3 catching 360 before 720 release is irrelevant unless you think the PS3 will stop selling on the 720s release (which you agreed will not happen).

I think that just about sums it up.

Simple facts, the PS3 sold more than the 360 in the US during its first 22 months on sale than the 360 did. It has outsold the 360 this year 4 out of 6 months. If you think that’s an iron fist, there’s really no helping you.

PS AWE DAMMIT! Just made a right royal ass of myself. In my last post I revised my estimate of when the PS3 could catch the 360 in the US using a weekly lead figure of 50k. Of course, I’ve no idea where I plucked that figure from……outta my ass it seems.

And just for the record chaps, I reckon the PS3 will beat the 360 globally if not in the US. Europe and Japan will swing it for Sony.

The iron grip is that at *current* rates, the PS3 will struggle to catch the 360 before the 720 probably arrives. Remember they’ve got to haul in an install lead of around 6,500,000 with a weekly lead in sales of about 50,000, assuming they can maintain that weekly lead permanently.

(Edit: My earlier point about taking nearly a decade to catch up was clearly wrong. More like four years I think.)

There is no iron grip. Only pre NPD spin.

Doesn’t get less confusing than this:

TIME ON SALE
360 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PS3 |||||||||||||||||||||

SALES
360 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PS3 ||||||||||||||