1. wz

    Graphically, it’s great. Style-wise, it’s your typical shooter.

    #1 6 years ago
  2. mortiferus

    I agree wz, pretty standard gameplay at best, boring at worst.

    #2 6 years ago
  3. No_PUDding

    graphically it isn’t totally realistic still. There is still godly hints at an art direction.

    I think I prefer art direction to Heavy Rain and Crysis.

    #3 6 years ago
  4. prodygee

    Hmm, they better not be lying with it requiring a little less ‘power’.

    #4 6 years ago
  5. SwiftRanger

    “pretty standard gameplay at best, boring at worst.”

    Depends on what you want to get out of it yourself, you could finish Far Cry fast if you played it like a linear shooter but you could also go out and actually try different paths as well. Same thing counts for Crysis which adds the suit powers to that. It’s all about sandbox play in a huge environment, not about tagging endlessly respawning enemies in some narrow alley.

    #5 6 years ago
  6. Whizzo

    The Nomad versus Koreans part of the game was what you made of it, the standard technique of going around guns blazing is one way but there’s a lot of potential ways around things, even just doing what needs doing without firing a single shot. It’s down to the player and for the first two thirds Crysis is a fantastic experience.

    #6 6 years ago
  7. mortiferus

    SwiftRanger, that is the problem with Crysis. Yes it’s a sandbox but it a shallow one. It get’s boring either way you play.

    #7 6 years ago
  8. SwiftRanger

    Well, then it’s linear shooters for you I guess. :)

    #8 6 years ago

Comments are now closed on this article.