<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Over half a million weapons in Borderlands, says Take-Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwiftRanger</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-19637</link>
		<dc:creator>SwiftRanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/#comment-19637</guid>
		<description>&quot;nobody is actually going to BALANCE 500,000 different weapons against each other for optimum gameplay value and variance.&quot;

It worked in Diablo which had a lot more parameters going for it, I am interested in this although I think the randomness of the drops, enemies and the environments will be just as important as the weapon thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;nobody is actually going to BALANCE 500,000 different weapons against each other for optimum gameplay value and variance.&#8221;</p>
<p>It worked in Diablo which had a lot more parameters going for it, I am interested in this although I think the randomness of the drops, enemies and the environments will be just as important as the weapon thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wz</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-19589</link>
		<dc:creator>wz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/#comment-19589</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re just doing this so someone can, ten minutes after the release, yell at them &quot;omfg itz only 384.200 this game sucks&quot;. Exhibiting his fail at life.

Which is exactly what I&#039;d do as a developer, to be honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re just doing this so someone can, ten minutes after the release, yell at them &#8220;omfg itz only 384.200 this game sucks&#8221;. Exhibiting his fail at life.</p>
<p>Which is exactly what I&#8217;d do as a developer, to be honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatner</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-19585</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/16/over-half-a-million-weapons-in-borderlands-says-take-two/#comment-19585</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Numbers. That&#039;s pretty meaningless in actual gameplay terms as, I suspect, nobody is actually going to BALANCE 500,000 different weapons against each other for optimum gameplay value and variance.

It&#039;ll just boil down to the usual four: melee, power, rapid and range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Numbers. That&#8217;s pretty meaningless in actual gameplay terms as, I suspect, nobody is actually going to BALANCE 500,000 different weapons against each other for optimum gameplay value and variance.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll just boil down to the usual four: melee, power, rapid and range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

