<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Id&#8217;s Hollenshead says tech advancement is key, new Rage shots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/08/ids-hollenshead-says-tech-advancment-is-key-new-rage-shots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/08/ids-hollenshead-says-tech-advancment-is-key-new-rage-shots/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:47:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Killerbee</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/08/ids-hollenshead-says-tech-advancment-is-key-new-rage-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-17999</link>
		<dc:creator>Killerbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/08/ids-hollenshead-says-tech-advancment-is-key-new-rage-shots/#comment-17999</guid>
		<description>In their defence I do agree with id - Doom 3 was a decent game; very atmospheric and, for its time, great to look at. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

I agree that Quake 4 was bobbins though, but that wasn&#039;t a bona fide id game - Raven did the design and just used id&#039;s tech.

I&#039;m looking forward to Rage, but I hope this new tech isn&#039;t any worse than Crysis in terms of demands on your PC. Top end tech is all well and good, but scalability is equally - if not more - important to most gamers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In their defence I do agree with id &#8211; Doom 3 was a decent game; very atmospheric and, for its time, great to look at. I thoroughly enjoyed it.</p>
<p>I agree that Quake 4 was bobbins though, but that wasn&#8217;t a bona fide id game &#8211; Raven did the design and just used id&#8217;s tech.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to Rage, but I hope this new tech isn&#8217;t any worse than Crysis in terms of demands on your PC. Top end tech is all well and good, but scalability is equally &#8211; if not more &#8211; important to most gamers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wz</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/07/08/ids-hollenshead-says-tech-advancment-is-key-new-rage-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-17997</link>
		<dc:creator>wz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/08/ids-hollenshead-says-tech-advancment-is-key-new-rage-shots/#comment-17997</guid>
		<description>The same id Software that, while being awesome up to Quake 3, has recently only released several mildly amusing tech demos?

But I guess it&#039;s true. Screw fun. Tech is where it&#039;s at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same id Software that, while being awesome up to Quake 3, has recently only released several mildly amusing tech demos?</p>
<p>But I guess it&#8217;s true. Screw fun. Tech is where it&#8217;s at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

