<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A first look at Damnation posted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUFFKING</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-16333</link>
		<dc:creator>DUFFKING</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/#comment-16333</guid>
		<description>This was a UT2004 mod wasn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a UT2004 mod wasn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-16284</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/#comment-16284</guid>
		<description>Blerk - You&#039;re not kidding :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blerk &#8211; You&#8217;re not kidding :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-16283</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/#comment-16283</guid>
		<description>They are properly rubbish, yep. It&#039;s because of the ads around them, I guess. On the Gamespot one, if I click on the full size link, the window doesn&#039;t open up to accommodate it. A small error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are properly rubbish, yep. It&#8217;s because of the ads around them, I guess. On the Gamespot one, if I click on the full size link, the window doesn&#8217;t open up to accommodate it. A small error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SticKboy</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-16281</link>
		<dc:creator>SticKboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/#comment-16281</guid>
		<description>Argh! Why do Gamespot and IGN insist on having such *awful* screenshot viewers? Who designs these godforsaken things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh! Why do Gamespot and IGN insist on having such *awful* screenshot viewers? Who designs these godforsaken things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/comment-page-1/#comment-16189</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/27/a-first-look-at-damnation-posted/#comment-16189</guid>
		<description>glol! I couldn&#039;t remember which one this was, and then I looked at the pictures of the &#039;lady in green&#039; and it all came flooding back.

&quot;Barely covered&quot; really doesn&#039;t describe her accurately enough. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glol! I couldn&#8217;t remember which one this was, and then I looked at the pictures of the &#8216;lady in green&#8217; and it all came flooding back.</p>
<p>&#8220;Barely covered&#8221; really doesn&#8217;t describe her accurately enough. <img src='http://www.vg247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

