<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The reason behind 360&#8242;s RROD: &#8220;Microsoft wanted to avoid an ASIC vendor&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:14:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13446</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13446</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Jaspers are going to be hard to find.  Partly because of old stock, partly because it&#039;s doubtful there will be an easy way to differentiate them and falcons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Jaspers are going to be hard to find.  Partly because of old stock, partly because it&#8217;s doubtful there will be an easy way to differentiate them and falcons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13442</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13442</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fine. I don&#039;t want one yet anyway. I might never want one. But I might. One day. Six months, maybe. Possibly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fine. I don&#8217;t want one yet anyway. I might never want one. But I might. One day. Six months, maybe. Possibly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whizzo</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13441</link>
		<dc:creator>Whizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13441</guid>
		<description>Not until the old ones sell out I would imagine, which could be a while given we&#039;re into Summer in the northern hemisphere so console sales aren&#039;t going to be that high. Probably the Autumn at the earliest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not until the old ones sell out I would imagine, which could be a while given we&#8217;re into Summer in the northern hemisphere so console sales aren&#8217;t going to be that high. Probably the Autumn at the earliest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13438</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13438</guid>
		<description>When are we likely to see Jasper units on the shop shelves, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are we likely to see Jasper units on the shop shelves, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whizzo</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13435</link>
		<dc:creator>Whizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13435</guid>
		<description>The CPU had a die shrink to 65nm in the &quot;Falcon&quot;, the GPU has the same done in &quot;Jasper&quot;, which is now in production.

So it should get cooler/quieter/more reliable. Probably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CPU had a die shrink to 65nm in the &#8220;Falcon&#8221;, the GPU has the same done in &#8220;Jasper&#8221;, which is now in production.</p>
<p>So it should get cooler/quieter/more reliable. Probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13434</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13434</guid>
		<description>Few different versions apparently.

Opus: Falcon minus HDMI for replacing RRoD original machines.
Jasper: 65nm shrink on the GPU to match the CPU shrink in Falcon.
Valhalla: 65nm single die (CPU / GPU).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few different versions apparently.</p>
<p>Opus: Falcon minus HDMI for replacing RRoD original machines.<br />
Jasper: 65nm shrink on the GPU to match the CPU shrink in Falcon.<br />
Valhalla: 65nm single die (CPU / GPU).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13432</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13432</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there supposed to be some more revised hardware on the way soon? Or did I imagine that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there supposed to be some more revised hardware on the way soon? Or did I imagine that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13427</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13427</guid>
		<description>Tiger: No, that never happened.  Would have been nice if it did though.  There was an Australian retailer that sent their stock back at the time, but that was apparently related to a bunch of busted drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiger: No, that never happened.  Would have been nice if it did though.  There was an Australian retailer that sent their stock back at the time, but that was apparently related to a bunch of busted drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiger Walts</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13426</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiger Walts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13426</guid>
		<description>Maybe I was wrong with the term &#039;recall&#039; but I&#039;m pretty sure that Zephyr units without the heat-exchange modification were sent back to MS to be upgraded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I was wrong with the term &#8216;recall&#8217; but I&#8217;m pretty sure that Zephyr units without the heat-exchange modification were sent back to MS to be upgraded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13405</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13405</guid>
		<description>OMG! Teh revelations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! Teh revelations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13401</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13401</guid>
		<description>Blerk: They are indeed correct that the 360 is a Microsoft product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blerk: They are indeed correct that the 360 is a Microsoft product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blerk</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13391</link>
		<dc:creator>Blerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13391</guid>
		<description>Is there any bit which is right? Maybe we could salvage something here? :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any bit which is right? Maybe we could salvage something here? <img src='http://www.vg247.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OrphanageExplosion</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13390</link>
		<dc:creator>OrphanageExplosion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13390</guid>
		<description>Indeed it is. It doesn&#039;t really stand up to much scrutiny bearing in mind the modifications (especially the initial ones in the Zephyr unit) made to the machine once RROD became an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is. It doesn&#8217;t really stand up to much scrutiny bearing in mind the modifications (especially the initial ones in the Zephyr unit) made to the machine once RROD became an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frod</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13385</link>
		<dc:creator>frod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13385</guid>
		<description>Just to reiterate, this article is just wrong from the start, middle, and end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to reiterate, this article is just wrong from the start, middle, and end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13374</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13374</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not as good as the first book, but it&#039;s still interesting.  Especially now as you can see where some of their decisions have had a lasting effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not as good as the first book, but it&#8217;s still interesting.  Especially now as you can see where some of their decisions have had a lasting effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13373</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13373</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve still never read that. I keep meaning to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve still never read that. I keep meaning to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13372</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13372</guid>
		<description>By the way... if anyone wants to know more about this I would read &quot;The Xbox 360 Uncloaked&quot; by Dean Takahashi.  Interesting reading if you&#039;re interested in this sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way&#8230; if anyone wants to know more about this I would read &#8220;The Xbox 360 Uncloaked&#8221; by Dean Takahashi.  Interesting reading if you&#8217;re interested in this sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13370</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13370</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s OK to change the headline: it is actually incorrect. You&#039;re right, it was never recalled. They just extended the warrantee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s OK to change the headline: it is actually incorrect. You&#8217;re right, it was never recalled. They just extended the warrantee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whizzo</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13369</link>
		<dc:creator>Whizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed EE Times ever published it, it&#039;s like the ramblings of the pub drunk who doesn&#039;t appear to know anything about the subject he&#039;s talking about but proclaims to be an expert.

Gartner needs a better chief analyst if that&#039;s the BS their current one spouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed EE Times ever published it, it&#8217;s like the ramblings of the pub drunk who doesn&#8217;t appear to know anything about the subject he&#8217;s talking about but proclaims to be an expert.</p>
<p>Gartner needs a better chief analyst if that&#8217;s the BS their current one spouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13368</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13368</guid>
		<description>In fairness, it&#039;s what they use over on the article.  It&#039;s just that the article is all sorts of un-factchecked wrong. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fairness, it&#8217;s what they use over on the article.  It&#8217;s just that the article is all sorts of un-factchecked wrong. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13367</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13367</guid>
		<description>&quot;Recall&quot; is the wrong term, you&#039;re right. I&#039;ll edit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Recall&#8221; is the wrong term, you&#8217;re right. I&#8217;ll edit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13366</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13366</guid>
		<description>haha... you don&#039;t know me very well if you think I&#039;m a fanboy Newbie.  I hate all the consoles equally, but I hate bullshit more. =)

The RRoD / 360 failure rates is just a pet interest of mine.  I&#039;ve been doing stats on it for a while now over at NeoGAF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha&#8230; you don&#8217;t know me very well if you think I&#8217;m a fanboy Newbie.  I hate all the consoles equally, but I hate bullshit more. =)</p>
<p>The RRoD / 360 failure rates is just a pet interest of mine.  I&#8217;ve been doing stats on it for a while now over at NeoGAF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newbie101</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13365</link>
		<dc:creator>Newbie101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13365</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if his right but I&#039;ve learned in the past always to trust fanboys when theres an article about &#039;their&#039; console.
So...

/me trusts Psycotext</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if his right but I&#8217;ve learned in the past always to trust fanboys when theres an article about &#8216;their&#8217; console.<br />
So&#8230;</p>
<p>/me trusts Psycotext</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whizzo</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13364</link>
		<dc:creator>Whizzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13364</guid>
		<description>The story is total and utter bollocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story is total and utter bollocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13362</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13362</guid>
		<description>In fact... this story is pretty much all wrong.  ATI designed the GPU from the start.

http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/9487/ATI-Releases-Xbox-360-GPU-Technology-Papers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact&#8230; this story is pretty much all wrong.  ATI designed the GPU from the start.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/9487/ATI-Releases-Xbox-360-GPU-Technology-Papers/" rel="nofollow">http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/9487/ATI-Releases-Xbox-360-GPU-Technology-Papers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13361</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13361</guid>
		<description>Was never recalled at retail either Tiger.  Though many people thought it should have been.  Besides the fact that if they did recall, it would have done nothing... the problems weren&#039;t ironed out until the falcon model which didn&#039;t even involve a new GPU - just a die shrunk CPU and motherboard modifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was never recalled at retail either Tiger.  Though many people thought it should have been.  Besides the fact that if they did recall, it would have done nothing&#8230; the problems weren&#8217;t ironed out until the falcon model which didn&#8217;t even involve a new GPU &#8211; just a die shrunk CPU and motherboard modifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiger Walts</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13360</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiger Walts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13360</guid>
		<description>It was recalled at retail level, but not from the consumers. A full recall would have been impossible. The replacement scheme was the best solution until they were manufacturing enough stable units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was recalled at retail level, but not from the consumers. A full recall would have been impossible. The replacement scheme was the best solution until they were manufacturing enough stable units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotext</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/comment-page-1/#comment-13359</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/06/11/why-xbox-360-was-recalled-microsoft-wanted-to-avoid-an-asic-vendor/#comment-13359</guid>
		<description>You might want to re-consider this news... you know, given that the 360 was never recalled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to re-consider this news&#8230; you know, given that the 360 was never recalled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

