But it says it’s an “exclusive agreement”, which I thought was dead.

L.A Noire is probabaly too expensive to be exclusive.

Edit – Oh and for the love of god stop editing your posts so significantly after you’ve done them. If you must insist on making various drafts, do it in word or something first… either that or have the basic decency to indicate what you’ve changed. I can only assume it’s part of your general tactic to make it look like people aren’t actually responding to what you’re posting.

“fanboy”

/marks card

By the way, seen the job posting that says L.A Noire is still PS3 exclusive?

Well, that’s fanboys for you. They love to tell everyone what a neutral expert they are. They talk the talk but are incapable of walking the walk. PT’s just another one.

/marks card

This is great. Someone should develop it into a proper game… but they should be sure not to say what platform it will be leading on, just to be safe.

Thanks.

The games do look exactly the same… if you’re Mr Magoo.

Stick to making up numbers and mocking from the sidelines PT. You seem to be good at that sort of meaningless stuff.

As for “leading” or not. What people are seeing today is a multiplatform title. Any apparent advantage a lead platform might have offered (more on-screen objects, for instance) won’t be evident any more. Or, you can just forget common sense and make the usual biased smartass but empty comments.

All these arguments are so fucking transparent and you ALL go through the same tactics again and again.

Still, seeing as we’re talking about merits of hardware, any ‘expert’ want to quote me the current XDK? It might be nice to have a fact thrown in amongst the bullshit

Talking of avoiding the issue… did the dev not say that the game would be the same on both platforms? Or have I somehow completely misread this sentence?

“We’re keeping the game the same over both platforms so we don’t want to take out any features.”

[Edit - Oh look, you edited your post to swap shifting focus to "moving the goalposts". Even better. We could play Shatner bingo... so far we have hypocrisy, defend, goalposts and impartial. If you can get ignorant, biased and games media in there somewhere too I think we'll be well on our way to a decent game.]

It’s cute. But a little obvious. Especially when you leapt to defend “gamers” and their hypocrisy in your earlier post. Why keep moving the goalposts Psycho?

There are always some who care about others getting screwed… but they’re in the minority, no matter what aspect of life you’re talking about.

Please, don’t imply there’s a principle at stake here. Not when there’s so much evidence over the last two years to show how little people care about equality until they think they’re the ones getting burned.

Such weak excuses for such blatant hypocrisy. Delicious!

Yes, god damn those irritating, demanding gamers for expecting a dev to actually make the game the same on both platforms when they say they’re going to.

It’s hilarious to watch as ‘impartial’ folk try to get their head around the unthinkable notion that a developer might not put their preferred console at the top of their agenda.

Loving all the non programmers going around dictating to others how things should be programmed, as usual. Fucking hilarious.

Game looks fun. In spite of it being, apparently, scaled down.

I’m sure the game plays fine.

Though mostly it was to gloat because of my crystal ball comment: “Double the objects… half the res.”

Well done

My guess is that they had a prototype running, where PS3 was capable of running more objects on screen at once, but when they got to actually adding the graphics work to it, the PS3′s gpu took a massive shit, and they either didn’t bother or didn’t know how to use the SPU’s to back it up, as other developers have obviously been able to do.

For shame guys…

Still got the PS3 version on the way. It’s far from the disaster some are calling it, but given the EU exclusivity and the PS3 being lead platform, this is certainly worth drawing a spot light on.