Comments on: Ubisoft alters RAM and disc space spec requirements for Assassin’s Creed PC

By: Blerk

Blerk — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:18:38 +0000

Yeah – my issue with the list isn’t because of the size of the specs or whatever, it’s because I haven’t a clue whether my computer actually meets those specs or not.

Well, that’s a bit of a lie – I know for a fact it wouldn’t be able to run the installer. But you catch my drift.

By: frod

frod — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:12:54 +0000

and THAT is the real issue facing PC gaming.

By: patlike

patlike — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:06:20 +0000

Fair enough. I do know worryingly little about up-to-date CPU and GPU stuff.

By: frod

frod — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:05:00 +0000

The midrange GPU in the recommended specs above is an 18 month-old card. Minimum CPUs are from the same period.

By: patlike

patlike — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:02:43 +0000

My PC will run it, but only because I bought it at Christmas. I can’t be arsed to play it, however.

By: morriss

morriss — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:27:18 +0000

+1 Blerk.

I really can’t be arsed/can’t afford to keep up. I need to have a PC sugardaddy who kits me out with the latest gear twice a year.

/places ad

By: frod

frod — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:29:53 +0000

They’re not that high really. Much better than the original specs anyway.

By: patlike

patlike — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:01:28 +0000

It’s bonkers. PCs like that aren’t cheap.

By: Blerk

Blerk — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:58:41 +0000

It’s lists like these that remind me why I started buying consoles.