<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GDC: GTA IV DLC is massive, says Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vg247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/</link>
	<description>VG247.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: videogaming247 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GTA IV is &#8220;superior&#8221; on 360, DLC is &#8220;significant&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>videogaming247 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GTA IV is &#8220;superior&#8221; on 360, DLC is &#8220;significant&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>[...] Rockstar North&#8217;s Neil Corbett has seemingly posted on rllmuk to say that the Xbox 360 version of GTA IV is &#8220;superior&#8221; to the PS3 SKU and that the Xbox 360 DLC is by no means as massive as we were previously led to believe. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rockstar North&#8217;s Neil Corbett has seemingly posted on rllmuk to say that the Xbox 360 version of GTA IV is &#8220;superior&#8221; to the PS3 SKU and that the Xbox 360 DLC is by no means as massive as we were previously led to believe. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scuz</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>scuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>surely exclusive means what its meant all along for most of microsoft&#039;s wankery, a year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>surely exclusive means what its meant all along for most of microsoft&#8217;s wankery, a year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patlike</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>patlike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>It does sound a tad inflated. Mind you, MS did spend a hell of a lot of money, so they&#039;d expect something decent for it, you&#039;d guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does sound a tad inflated. Mind you, MS did spend a hell of a lot of money, so they&#8217;d expect something decent for it, you&#8217;d guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syrok</title>
		<link>http://www.vg247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Syrok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/02/22/gdc-gta-iv-dlc-is-massive-says-microsoft/#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>But what about those people who don&#039;t have a HD?

Probably not going to happen anyway, at least not in the way as it is descripted there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what about those people who don&#8217;t have a HD?</p>
<p>Probably not going to happen anyway, at least not in the way as it is descripted there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

